PERFOMANCE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT SPEECH CODER

Guided By:
Vijayendra Desai

Prepared By:
Milan Rathod Pragnesh Patel Darpan Patel Vicky Patel

Introduction

SPEECH MODEL AND CODING

Origin of Speech Signal

SPEECH MODEL AND CODING

CLASSIFICATION OF SPEECH SIGNALS MODELLING THE SPEECH PRODUCTION SYSTEM

SPEECH MODEL AND CODING

OVERVIEW OF SPEECH CODING

Properties of Speech Coder Applications of Speech Coders

DIAGRAM OF A SPEECH CODER

Properties of Speech Coder Applications of Speech Coders

 Classification of speech coders

Category High bit-rate Medium bit-rate Low bit-rate Very bit-rate Bit Rate Range >15 Kbps 5 to 10 Kbps 2 to 5 Kbps <2 Kbps

Classification by Coding Techniques

EVALUATION METHOD
Subjective quality measurement 1. ACR test 2. DCR test Objective quality measurement

ACR METHODS OF SUBJECTIVE QUALITY MEASURMENT

How it performed? ACR RATING
CATEGORY 5 4 3 2 1 RATING EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR POOR BAD

DCR METHODS OF SUBJECTIVE QUALITY MEASURMENT

How it performed? DCR RATING
CATEGORY 5 4 3 2 1 RATING

Inaudible Audible but not annoying Slightly annoying Annoying

Very annoying

Subjective Quality Measurement

This subjective method is regarding to ITU-T recommendation P.835 The speech signal alone using a five-point scale of signal distortion (SIG)
Rating 5 4 3 2 1 Description Very natural, no degradation Fairly natural , Little degradation Somewhat natural , somewhat degraded Fairly unnatural , fairly degraded Very unnatural , very degraded

 The background noise alone using a five-point scale of background intrusiveness (BAK)
Rating 5 4 3 2 1 Description Not noticeable Somewhat noticeable Not intrusive Somewhat intrusive Very intrusive

 The overall quality using the scale of the mean opinion score (MOS)
Rating 5 4 3 2 1 Description Excellent Good Fair Poor Bad

OBJECTIVE MEASURES
correlation coefficient

PESQ LPC-Based Objective Measures

 Time-Domain and Frequency-Weighted SNR Measures

WSS Measures

COMPOSITE MEASURES
Combining basic objective measure Multiple linear regression analysis and MARS analysis SIG,BAK,OVRL Correlate Highly with subjective rating Subset measures

RESULT
Original speech Compressed speech
CELP-10200.wav CELP-7950.wav

Overall quality
3.9147 3.7527 3.5535 3.6258

Signal distortion
4.6669 3.0620 3.0683 4.3641

Back ground distortion

3.8185 4.5204 4.5083 3.3879

Doormono .wave

CELP-5900.wav CELP-4700.wav

RESULT FOR SUBJECTIVE ANALYSIS

SPEECH Ninandvoice_2.73kbps.wav Ninandvoice_2.3kbps.wav Ninandvoice_2.15kbps.wav Ninandvoice_2.05kbps.wav Ninandvoice_1.8kbps.wav AMOS 3.64 3.64 3.50 3.21 3.07 DMOS 3.35 3.21 3.14 3.07 2.64

Conclusion

Thank you ..