Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CH 01
CH 01
Chapter 1
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 1
Who am I?
Name: Dr Tao Huang
Email address: taohuang@uic.edu.cn
Office telephone number: 8145
Room number: T1-402-R11
Preferred means of contact: Email
2
Teaching Plan
Class Assignment
Week Chapter Title / Topic
Discussion
Introduction to FRM
1 Lec 1
Value-at-Risk (VaR) Measure questions
2 Lec 2 selected from
Tutorial
Market Risk Measurement questions Assignment 1 posted
3 Lec 3 selected from
Tutorial
Market Risk Measurement questions
4 Lec 4 (continued): selected from
Tutorial
Market Risk Estimation: historical questions Assignment 1 due
5 Lec 5 simulation selected from
Tutorial
Market Risk Estimation: model questions
6 Lec 6 building approach selected from
Tutorial
Credit Risk Measurement questions Assignment 2 posted
3
7 Lec 7 selected from
Tutorial
Teaching Plan
Week Chapter Title / Topic Class Discussion Assignment
8 Reading Week
Credit Risk Estimation questions Assignment 2 due
9 Lec 8 selected from
Tutorial
Market Risk Stress Testing questions
10 Lec 9 selected from
Tutorial
Pre-/post- reading
Lectures
Tutorials, example questions
Problem oriented, research-led
learning
6
Textbook
7
Assessment
Class Participation 10%
Assignments (three) 50%
Final Examination (3 hours) 40%
100%
8
Introduction
Risk vs Return
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 10
Example (Table 1.1, page 2)
Suppose Treasuries yield 5% and the
returns for an equity investment are:
Probability Return
0.05 +50%
0.25 +30%
0.40 +10%
0.25 –10%
0.05 –30%
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 11
Example continued
We can characterize investments by their
expected return and standard deviation of
return
For the equity investment:
Expected return =10%
Standard deviation of return =18.97%
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 12
Combining Two Risky Investments (page 5)
16
Expected
14 Return (%)
1 10% 12
2 15% 10
1 16% 8
6
2 24%
4
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 13
Efficient Frontier of Risky
Investments (Figure 1.3, page 6)
Efficient
Expected Frontier
Return
Investments
S.D. of
Return
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 14
Efficient Frontier of All Investments
(Figure 1.4, page 6)
Expected J
Return
M
E(RM)
I
Previous Efficient
F Frontier
RF
New Efficient
Frontier
S.D. of Return
M
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 15
Systematic vs Non-Systematic Risk
(equation 1.3, page 8)
R a RM
Systematic Risk
Non-systematic risk
(non-diversifiable)
(diversifiable)
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 16
The Capital Asset Pricing Model
(Figure 1.5, page 9)
Expected
Return
E(R)
E(RM)
E ( R ) RF [ E ( RM ) RF ]
RF
Beta
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 17
Assumptions
Investors care only about expected return and SD of
return
The ’s of different investments are independent
Investors focus on returns over one period
All investors can borrow or lend at the same risk-free
rate
Tax does not influence investment decisions
All investors make the same estimates of ’s, ’s and
’s.
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 18
Alpha
Alpha measure the extra return on a
portfolio in excess of that predicted by
CAPM
E ( RP ) RF ( RM RF )
so that
RP RF ( RM RF )
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 19
Arbitrage Pricing Theory
Returns depend on several factors
We can form portfolios to eliminate the
dependence on the factors
This leads to result that expected return is
linearly dependent on the realization of the
factors
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 20
Risk vs Return for Companies
If shareholders care only about systematic risk, should
the same be true of company managers?
In practice companies are concerned about total risk
Earnings stability and company survival are important
managerial objectives
The regulators of financial institutions are primarily
interested in total risk
“Bankruptcy costs” arguments show that that managers
may be acting in the best interests of shareholders when
they consider total risk
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 21
What Are Bankruptcy Costs?
(Business Snapshot 1.1, page 15)
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 22
Approaches to Bank Risk
Management
Risk aggregation: aims to get rid of non-
systematic risks with diversification
Risk decomposition: tackles risks one by
one
In practice banks use both approaches
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 23
Credit Ratings
Moody’s S&P and Fitch
Aaa AAA
Aa AA Investment
A A grade bonds
Baa BBB
Ba BB
B B
Non-investment
Caa CCC grade bonds
Ca CC
C C
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 24
Subdivisions
Moody’s divides Aa into Aa1, Aa2, Aa3.
S&P and Fitch divide AA into AA+, AA, and
AA−
Other rating categories are subdivided
similarly except AAA (Aaa) and the two
lowest categories.
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 25
Classification of Risk
Market risk
Credit risk
Operational risk
Liquidity risk
Model risk