Task 3

Business law

case studies

MAHUM RAUF
Demonstrating how a party might
obtain legal advices and support
 Government changes always impact the legislation. It gives the impact such as national
minimum wage increases and business fund also increases.
 All the legal assistance is indented to make a legal system accessible for everyone in the
country.
 The system also maintains the democratic ideals like equality under law and others.
CASE STUDY 1
LIABILITY AND RIGHTS OF MAHMUD AND AHMAD

 SOLUTION
 Contract act 1872 states that such kinds of agreement with one party promise should have specified
activities and except the same in exchange of legal consideration.
 Ahmad fraud with Mahmud hence as he came up with car which is already been ordered and agreement
with other parties. If Ahmad did not fulfilled then he have rights to penalized with charges and have to
give the car as well.
 As per the situation contract says that Mahmud should receive the balance in return or justice.
 He have all the rights and liabilities to go against Ahmad for not having 1800cc.
 Contracting parties must have performed all the respective commitments.
Different sources of legal advices

 Alternative Conflict Resolution (ADR) strategies are widely utilized for dispute
resolution in all sectors of civil life, particularly the economic side.
 Master assurance is likewise a type of elective debate goal procedure, by which
gatherings present their question to a capable individual to choose as per his
intuition.
 The arbiter assists the gatherings with haggling on the issues between the
gatherings and supports them by distinguishing issues and the approaches to
resolving those debates.
Case study 2
oil refinery and Salvatore owners
 Tort of negligence is common and it demonstrate the respondent owed by obligation of care and have
supported either predicable mischief or an outcome of carelessness claimed.
 Torts are legal wrongs done by one party to another. Negligence is a type of tort that arose as a result of
certain types of loss or harm occurring between parties who do not have a contract with each other and
thus have no basis to sue the other. Salvatore has been unable to work again due to the trauma, according
to contract law. He had suffered because it demonstrated that the lack of preservation was done by all
employees, not just him. Just Salvatore, so in terms of liability, Salvatore also failed to apply the act and
As there was a chance to save the oil refinery, the firm worked in a respectable manner.as a result, he will
punished for the loss.
 They should have given them aid or treat them by because of social security. And have them duty of care.
Effectiveness of legal solution for dispute resolution

 It includes accommodating, agreeing and sharing. They also judge and what they require from
the procedure who believed the validly of the cases.
 It also promotes judicial system which led to more foreign investment.
 Corvo vs Beam case No.1 Hyde v Wrench 1840
 Introduce complexities
 Guarantees consistency and predictability.
 Court precedent saves times on future.
Legal advantages and disadvantages

 Available on online web

 Scope of legal advice
 Case no 2: Donald vs Douglas
 Limited qualified advisors
 Douglas can receive legal aid and employment rights.
 Can have websites since Donald cannot abuse his job and cut promised remuneration.
 Case study 3
Linford LeRoy vs sally Ann
 Solution
 Leroy and Linford are both equal in this crime because Linford was drunk and Leroy accepted the offer of
taking the lift, so contract law applies. When you're driving, it's your responsibility to follow traffic laws,
avoid known hazards, and generally respect the safety of others. What if the injuries are severe? The
plaintiff cannot establish that the defendant's actions were beyond what the drunk driver could have
reasonably predicted. That the driver's intoxication was the direct cause of the injuries Damages: The
plaintiff must pay damages. Show that they truly suffered damages, such as car damage and/or bodily
injuries.
 And will pay charges for breaking the laws while driving and its strictly forbidden to drive car while drunk
and will pay for his loss which he has done after hitting like breaking Leroy both legs, As it is obvious
from liable of negligence, their culpability arises from careless or thoughtless action or a failure to act
when a reasonable person would have done according to Act 185.