Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Supersonic Base Flow - Presentation
Supersonic Base Flow - Presentation
• Disadvantages:
Great dependence toward turbulence modeling;
Do not predict the mixing layer expansion satisfactory;
Have been derived from the imcompressible form;
Numerical Methods
Large-Eddy Simulation:
• Advantages:
Well suited for prediction of free shear flows;
Low computational cost compared with dynamic
models;
Can predict separated flows more accurately;
• Disadvantages:
Higher computational cost compared with RANS;
Numerical Methods
Zonal Detached Eddy Simulation (ZDES)
• Advantages:
Has given encouraging results for a wide range of
flow configurations exhibiting massive separations;
Grid refinement occurs only in the regions of interest
such as the separated area in the case of base flows;
• Disadvantages:
Higher computational cost;
Discussion
• Simon, Deck and Guillen developed an
experiment to investigate the supersonic base
flow;
• The body used in their experiment was a
cylinder;
• Unstady simulations have been performed with
ZEDS, RANS and LES;
• Thus, the behavior of such methods can be
investigated and compared;
Discussion
Data of the experiment:
• M = 2.46;
• U = 593.8 m/s;
• Re = 45x10^(6);
• P = 31415 Pa;
• T = 145 K;
• R = 31.75 mm
• Two different meshs [ Nxyz 5x10^6 (M1) and Nxyz
13.5x10^6 nodes (M2);
Discussion