Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MBA Production Management - Forecasting - Caguillo, Christine Joy
MBA Production Management - Forecasting - Caguillo, Christine Joy
COMPANY STRATEGY/ISSUES
Best period to Practical to change Poor time to change Cost control
increase market price or quality image, price, or critical
share image quality
Internet Drive-through
restaurants
Color printers
Sales
3 1/2”
Floppy
Flat-screen disks
monitors DVD
Figure 2.5
2
DETERMINE THE USE OF THE
FORECAST
QUALITATIVE QUANTITATIVE
Used when situation is vague and Used when situation is ‘stable’ and
little data exist historical data exist
New products Existing products
New technology Current technology
Involves intuition, experience Involves mathematical techniques
e.g., forecasting sales on e.g., forecasting sales of color
Internet televisions
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 16
OVERVIEW OF
QUALITATIVE METHODS
Jury of executive opinion Sales force composite
Pool opinions of high-level Estimates from
executives, sometimes individual salespersons
augment by statistical models are reviewed for
Delphi method reasonableness, then
Panel of experts, queried aggregated
iteratively Consumer Market Survey
Ask the customer
DECISION
Iterative group MAKERS
process, continues (Evaluate
until consensus is responses and
reached make decisions)
3 types of participants STAFF
(Administering
Decision makers survey)
Staff
Respondents
RESPONDENTS
(People who can make
valuable judgments)
Trend Cyclical
Seasonal Random
Actual
demand
Average
demand over
Random four years
variation
| | | |
1 2 3 4
Year Figure 4.1
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 29
NAIVE APPROACH
Assumes demand in next period is
the same as demand in most recent
period
e.g., If May sales were 48, then
June sales will be 48
Sometimes cost effective and
efficient
Actual 3-Month
Month Shed Sales Moving Average
January 10
February 12
March 13
April 16 (10 + 12 + 13)/3 = 11 2/3
May 19 (12 + 13 + 16)/3 = 13 2/3
June 23 (13 + 16 + 19)/3 = 16
July 26 (16 + 19 + 23)/3 = 19 1/3
Moving
Average
30 –
28 –
Forecast
26 – Actual
24 – Sales
Shed Sales
22 –
20 –
18 –
16 –
14 –
12 –
10 –
| | | | | | | | | | | |
J F M A M J J A S O N D
20 – Actual
sales
15 –
Moving
10 – average
5 –
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Figure 4.2
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Ft = Ft – 1 + a(At – 1 - Ft – 1)
175 –
a = .1
| | | | | | | | |
150 –
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Quarter
Commonly used = 0.05 to 0.50
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 43
CHOOSING
The objective is to obtain the most
accurate forecast no matter the
technique
We generally do this by selecting the
model that gives us the lowest forecast
error
n
100 ∑ |actuali - forecasti|/actuali
MAPE = i=1
n
Ft = a(At - 1) + (1 - a)(Ft - 1 + Tt - 1)
Tt = b(Ft - Ft - 1) + (1 - b)Tt - 1
Step 1: Compute Ft
Step 2: Compute Tt
Step 3: Calculate the forecast FITt = Ft + Tt
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 48
EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING WITH
TREND ADJUSTMENT EXAMPLE
Forecast
Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including
Month(t) Demand (At) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt
1 12 11 2 13.00
2 17
3 20
4 19
5 24
6 21
7 31
8 28
9 36
10
Table 4.1
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 49
EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING WITH
TREND ADJUSTMENT EXAMPLE
Forecast
Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including
Month(t) Demand (At) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt
1 12 11 2 13.00
2 17
3 20
4 19
5 24 Step 1: Forecast for Month 2
6 21
7 31 F2 = aA1 + (1 - a)(F1 + T1)
8 28
9 36 F2 = (.2)(12) + (1 - .2)(11 + 2)
10 = 2.4 + 10.4 = 12.8 units
Table 4.1
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 50
EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING WITH
TREND ADJUSTMENT EXAMPLE
Forecast
Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including
Month(t) Demand (At) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt
1 12 11 2 13.00
2 17 12.80
3 20
4 19
5 24 Step 2: Trend for Month 2
6 21
7 31 T2 = b(F2 - F1) + (1 - b)T1
8 28
9 36 T2 = (.4)(12.8 - 11) + (1 - .4)(2)
10 = .72 + 1.2 = 1.92 units
Table 4.1
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 51
EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING WITH
TREND ADJUSTMENT EXAMPLE
Forecast
Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including
Month(t) Demand (At) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt
1 12 11 2 13.00
2 17 12.80 1.92
3 20
4 19
5 24 Step 3: Calculate FIT for Month 2
6 21
7 31 FIT2 = F2 + T1
8 28
9 36
FIT2 = 12.8 + 1.92
10 = 14.72 units
Table 4.1
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 52
EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING WITH
TREND ADJUSTMENT EXAMPLE
Forecast
Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including
Month(t) Demand (At) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt
1 12 11 2 13.00
2 17 12.80 1.92 14.72
3 20 15.18 2.10 17.28
4 19 17.82 2.32 20.14
5 24 19.91 2.23 22.14
6 21 22.51 2.38 24.89
7 31 24.11 2.07 26.18
8 28 27.14 2.45 29.59
9 36 29.28 2.32 31.60
10 32.48 2.68 35.16
Table 4.1
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 53
EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING WITH
TREND ADJUSTMENT EXAMPLE
35 –
Actual demand (At)
Product demand 30 –
25 –
20 –
15 –
10 –
Forecast including trend (FITt)
5 –
0 – | | | | | | | | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Figure 4.3
Time (month)
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 54
TREND PROJECTIONS
y^ = a + bx
^ where y = computed value of the
variable to be predicted (dependent
variable)
a = y-axis intercept
b = slope of the regression line
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.
x = the independent variable 4 – 55
SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN DATA
2006 Forecast
140 – 2005 Demand
130 – 2004 Demand
2003 Demand
120 –
Demand
110 –
100 –
90 –
80 –
70 –
| | | | | | | | | | | |
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Time
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 61
ASSOCIATIVE FORECASTING
Sales
3.5 7
2.0 –
1.0 –
| | | | | | |
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Area payroll
Sales, y Payroll, x x2 xy
2.0 1 1 2.0
3.0 3 9 9.0
2.5 4 16 10.0
2.0 2 4 4.0
2.0 1 1 2.0
3.5 7 49 24.5
∑y = 15.0 ∑x = 18 ∑x2 = 80 ∑xy = 51.5
Sales
2.0 –
Sales = 1.75 + .25(6)
Sales = $325,000 1.0 –
| | | | | | |
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Area payroll
Sales
3.0 –
probability
2.0 –
distribution
1.0 –
| | | | | | |
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Area payroll
Figure 4.9
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 66
CORRELATION
How strong is the linear relationship
between the variables?
Correlation does not necessarily imply
causality!
Coefficient of correlation, r, measures
degree of association
Values range from -1 to +1
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
nSxy - SxSy
r=
[nSx2 - (Sx)2][nSy2 - (Sy)2]
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 67
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
^
y = 1.80 + .30x1 - 5.0x2