After Philippine independence in 1946, Ferdinand Marcos was elected president in 1965 and re-elected in 1969. In 1972, Marcos declared martial law citing growing communist insurgency. A new constitution was drafted and approved in 1973, centralizing power in the presidency. While intended as a parliamentary system, amendments ensured the president maintained executive powers, transforming it into an authoritarian system with Marcos in control.
After Philippine independence in 1946, Ferdinand Marcos was elected president in 1965 and re-elected in 1969. In 1972, Marcos declared martial law citing growing communist insurgency. A new constitution was drafted and approved in 1973, centralizing power in the presidency. While intended as a parliamentary system, amendments ensured the president maintained executive powers, transforming it into an authoritarian system with Marcos in control.
After Philippine independence in 1946, Ferdinand Marcos was elected president in 1965 and re-elected in 1969. In 1972, Marcos declared martial law citing growing communist insurgency. A new constitution was drafted and approved in 1973, centralizing power in the presidency. While intended as a parliamentary system, amendments ensured the president maintained executive powers, transforming it into an authoritarian system with Marcos in control.
After the liberation of the Philippines from Japanese control in
1944, the Americans restored the Commonwealth Government in the Philippines with Sergio Osmena as President (Quezon died while exile inthe US). As provided earlier by the Tydings-Mcduffie Law, the Americans granted Philippine independence on July 4, 1946. Thus, the Third Republic, which adopted the 1935 Constitution, and still in effect. Afterwhich, six presidents had administered the government of thisRepublic (Roxas, Quirino, Magsaysay, Macapagal, and Marcos). In 1965, Ferdinand E. Marcos was elected president. Marcos wonthe re-election in 1969, in a bid boosted by campaign overspending and use of government funds. in 1967, Philippine Congress passed a resolution calling for a constitutional convention to change the 1935Constitution.On August 24, 1970, RA No. 6132 was approved setting November10, 1970 as an election day for 320 delegates to the ConstitutionalConvention. Former President Carlos P. Garcia being elected asconvention president. Unfortunately, he died, and was succeeded by another former president, Diosdado Macapagal.Before the convention finished its work, martial law was declared. Marcos cited a growing communist insurgency. The convention started its work rewriting the Constitution on June 1, 1971. The 1935 Constitution, with reference to theMalolos Constitution, was made the basis for the drafting of amendments to the new Constitution. After 15 months, on its291 st plenary session on November 29, 1972, the conventionapproved the new proposed charter of the land. The vote was273 in favor, 15 against, 27 absent. 1 refused to vote. There were no abstentions. The proposed Constitution was signed thefollowing day, November 30, 1972. Earlier on September 21, 1972, Marcos issued ProclamationNo. 1081 placing the entire country under martial law. Tobroaden the base of citizen participation in the democraticprocess, and to afford ample opportunities for the citizenry toexpress their views on important matters of local or nationalconcern, Presidential Decree No. 86 was issued on December 3,1972 creating a Citizens Assembly in each barrio inmunicipalities and in each district in chartered cities throughout the country. Subsequently, Presidential Decree No. 86A was issued on January 5, 1973 defining the role of barangays (formerly Citizens Assemblies). It provides that the barangay created under PD 86shall constitute the base for cetizen participation ingovernmental affairs and their collective views shall beconsidered in the formulation of national policies or programsand, whenever practicable, shall be translated into concrete andspecific decisions. The results revealed that 14,976,561 members of all theBarangays (Citizens Assemblies) voted for the adoption of theproposed Constitution, as against 743,869 who voted for itsrejection. On question as to whether or not the people wouldstill like a plebiscite to be called to ratify the new Constitution,14,298,814 answered that there was no need for a plebiscite. On the basis of the above results showing that more than 95%of the members of the Barangays (Citizen Assemblies) were infavor of the new Constitution and upon the strong recommendation of the Katipunan ng mga Barangay , Marcosissued Proclamation No. 1102 on January 17, 1973 certifying and proclaiming that the Constitution proposed by the 1971Constitutional Convention had been ratified by the Filipinopeople in a viva voce vote and had thereby come in effect. The 1973 Constitution was amended by the following: • The first, in 1976, gave the President, Legislative powers evenif the Interim Batasang Pambansa was already operating. • The second, in 1980 was not significant. It merely raised theretirement of justices of the SC from 65 to 70 as to keepFernando for 5 more years. • The third, in 1980 changed the form of government fromParliamentary to Presidential. • The fourth, in 1984, responded to the succession problem by providing for a Vice-President. The 1973 Constitution, promulgated after Marcos’ declarationof martial law, was supposed to introduced a parliamentary-stylegovernment. Legislative power was vested in a unicameralNational Assembly whose members were elected for six- yearterms. The President was ideally elected as the symbolic andpurely ceremonial head of state chosen from amongst themembers of the National Assembly for a six-year term and couldbe re-elected to an unlimited number of terms Executive power was meant to be exercised by the PrimeMinister who was also elected from amongst the sitting Assemblymen. The Prime Minister was to be the head of government and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.But the set up was subsequently amended. The 1976amendment are: • An Interim Batasang Pambansa (IBP) substituting for theInterim National Assembly; • The President would also become the Prime Minister and he would continue to exercise legislative powers until such timemartial law was lifted. Other amendment authorized the President to legislate on hisown on an “emergency” basis: Whenever in the judgement of the President there exists a grave emergency or a treat imminence thereof, or whenever theIBP fails or unable to act adequately on any matter for any reason that in his judgement requires immediate action, he may,in order to meet the exigency, issue the necessary decrees,orders or letters of instructions, which shall be form part of thelaw of the land. In the 1981 amendment, the false parliamentary system wasformally modified into a French-style semi-presidential system: • Executive power was restored to the President; • Direct election of the President was restored; • An Executive Committee composed of the Prime Ministerand not more than 14 members was created to “assist thePresident in the exercise of his powers and functions and inthe cabinet While the 1973 Constitution ideally provided for a true parliamentary system, in practice, Marcos had made use of subterfuge and manipulation in order to keep executive powers for himself, rather than devolving these to the Assembly and the cabinet headed by the PrimeMinister.The end result was the final form of the 1973 – after all amendmentsand subtle manipulations- were merely the abolition of the Senate and a series of cosmetic rewordings. The old American-derived terminology was replaced by names more ssociated with parliamentary government: The House of Representatives became known as the “ Batasang Pambansa ” (National Assembly); Departments became “Ministries”, and their cabinet secretaries became known as “cabinet ministers”, with the President assistant – the Executive Secretary – being styled the “Prime Minister” . Marcos’ purported parliamentary system in practice functioned as anuthoritarian presidential system, with all real power concentrated in the ands of the President but with the promise that such was constitutional.