Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 19

Organization Development and Change

Chapter Fourteen:
Restructuring Organizations

Thomas G. Cummings
Christopher G. Worley
Learning Objectives
for Chapter Fourteen
• To understand the basic principles of
technostructural design
• To understand the three basic structural
choices and two advanced structural choices
available to organizations
• To understand the process of downsizing
and reengineering
Cummings & Worley, 8e 14-2
(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western
Contingencies Influencing
Structural Design
Environment

Organization Worldwide
Size Structural Operations
Design

Organization
Technology Goals

Cummings & Worley, 8e 14-3


(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western
Functional Organization

President

V P Research V P Operations V P Hum an V P M arketing V P Finance


Resources

Cummings & Worley, 8e 14-4


(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western
The Functional Form
Advantages Disadvantages
• Promotes skill specialization • Emphasizes routine tasks;
• Reduces duplication of scarce encourages short time horizons
resources and uses resources • Fosters parochial perspectives
full time
by managers and limits capacity
• Enhances career development for top-management positions
for specialists within large
departments • Multiplies interdepartmental
• Facilitates communication and dependencies; increases
performance because superiors coordination and scheduling
share expertise with their difficulties
subordinates
• Obscures accountability for
• Exposes specialists to others overall results
within same specialty
Cummings & Worley, 8e 14-5
(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western
The Divisional Organization
Chief Ex ecutive
Officer

Chief Financial VP Research


Officer

Division M anager Division M anager Division M anager


Asia North Am erica E urope

VP Hum an V P Operations V P Sa les and


Resource s M arketing

Cummings & Worley, 8e 14-6


(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western
The Divisional Form
Advantages Disadvantages
• Recognizes interdepartmental • May use skills and resource
interdependencies inefficiently
• Fosters an orientation toward • Limits career advancement by
overall outcomes and clients specialists
• Allows diversification and • Impedes specialists’ exposure
expansion of skills/training to others within same
specialties
• Ensures accountability by
departmental managers and • Puts multiple-role demands
promotes delegation upon people and creates stress
• Heightens departmental • May promote departmental
cohesion and involvement in objectives as opposed to
work overall organizational goals

Cummings & Worley, 8e 14-7


(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western
The Matrix Organization
President
CE O

V P Finance V P Hum an R esourc es

S enior V P S enior V P
Progra m s Opera tions

V P R esea rch V P E ngineering V P M anufacturing V P M arke ting

Program M anager
Airc ra ft

Program M anager
N avigation S ystem s

Program M anager
S pac e S ystem s

Cummings & Worley, 8e 14-8


(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western
The Matrix Structure
Advantages Disadvantages
• Makes specialized, functional • Can be difficult to implement
knowledge available to all • Increases role ambiguity,
projects stress, and anxiety
• Use people flexibly • Performance is lowered
• Maintains consistency by without power balancing
forcing communication between projects and
functions
between managers
• Makes inconsistent demands
• Recognizes and provides and can promote conflict and
mechanisms for dealing with short-term crisis orientation
legitimate, multiple sources of
power • May reward political skills
over technical skills
• Can adapt to environmental
changes
Cummings & Worley, 8e 14-9
(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western
Characteristics of
Process-Based Structures
 Processes drive structure
 Work adds value
 Teams are fundamental
 Customers define performance
 Teams are rewarded for performance
 Teams are tightly linked to suppliers and
customers
 Team members are well informed and trained
Cummings & Worley, 8e 14-10
(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western
The Process-Based Structure
S enior M anagem ent T eam
C h air an d K e y S u p p o rt P roc e s s O w n e rs

Developing New Products Process


P roc es s O w n er
C ros s F u n c tion al Tea m M em b ers

Acquiring and Filling Custom er Orders Process


P roc es s O w n er
C ros s F u n c tion al Tea m M em b ers

S upporting Custom er Usage Process


P roc es s O w n er
C ros s F u n c tion al Tea m M em b ers

Cummings & Worley, 8e 14-11


(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western
The Process-Based Form
Advantages Disadvantages
• Focuses resources on • Can threaten middle managers
customer satisfaction and staff specialists
• Improves speed and efficiency • Requires changes in
• Adapts to environmental command-and-control
change rapidly mindsets
• Reduces boundaries between • Duplicates scarce resources
departments • Requires new skills and
• Increases ability to see total knowledge to manage lateral
work flow relationships and teams
• Enhances employee • May take longer to make
involvement decisions in teams
• Lowers costs dues to overhead • Can be ineffective if wrong
processes are identified
Cummings & Worley, 8e 14-12
(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western
The Network Organization
Designer Producer
Organizations Organizations

Broker
Organization

Supplier Distributor
Organizations Organizations

Cummings & Worley, 8e 14-13


(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western
Types of Networks
 Internal Market Network
 Vertical Market Network
 Intermarket Network
 Opportunity Network

Cummings & Worley, 8e 14-14


(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western
The Network-Based Form
Advantages Disadvantages
• Enables highly flexible and • Difficulty managing lateral
adaptive responses relationships across
• Creates a “best of the best” autonomous organizations
firm to focus resources on • Difficulty motivating
customer and market needs
members to relinquish
• Each organization can autonomy to join network
leverage a distinctive
competency • Sustaining membership and
benefits can be problematic
• Permits rapid global
response • May give partners access to
• Can produce “synergistic” proprietary knowledge and
results technology

Cummings & Worley, 8e 14-15


(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western
The Downsizing Process

• Clarify the organization’s strategy


• Assess downsizing options and make
relevant choices
• Implement the changes
• Address the needs of survivors and those
who leave
• Follow through with growth plans
Cummings & Worley, 8e 14-16
(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western
Downsizing Tactics
Tactic Characteristics Examples
 Reduces headcount  Attrition
Workforce  Short-term focus  Retirement/buyout
Reduction  Fosters transition  Layoffs

 Changes  Eliminate functions,


Organization organization layers, products
Redesign  Medium-term focus  Merge units
 Fosters transition &  Redesign tasks
transformation

 Changes culture  Change


Systemic  Long-term focus responsibilities
 Fosters  Foster continuous
transformation improvement
 Downsizing is normal

Cummings & Worley, 8e 14-17


(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western
The Reengineering Process
• Prepare the organization
• Specify the organization’s strategy and
objectives
• Fundamentally rethink the way work gets done
– Identify and analyze core business processes
– Define performance objectives
– Design new processes
• Restructure the organization around the new
business processes.
Cummings & Worley, 8e 14-18
(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western
Characteristics of
Reengineered Organizations
 Work units change from functional departments to process
teams
 Jobs change from simple tasks to multidimensional work
 People’s roles change from controlled to empowered
 The focus of performance measures and compensation
shifts from activities to results.
 Organization structures change from hierarchical to flat
 Managers change from supervisors to coaches; executives
change from scorekeepers to leaders
Cummings & Worley, 8e 14-19
(c)2005 Thomson/South-Western

You might also like