Professional Documents
Culture Documents
01 Doing Philosophy
01 Doing Philosophy
TOPICS
• DEFINITION
• BEGINNINGS OF DOING PHILOSOPHY
• APPROACHES IN DOING PHILOSOPHY
OBJECTIVES
• DEFINE PHILOSOPHY.
• EVALUATE THE IDEAS OF EARLY PHILOSOPHERS.
• UNDERSTAND THE APPROACH OF PHILOSOPHY.
WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY?
• DIFFERENTIA: THE FEATURES THAT SET THE DEFINED CONCEPT APART FROM OTHER MEMBERS OF ITS
GENUS.
RULES FOR EVALUATING AND CONSTRUCTING
DEFINITIONS
• 3. DEFINITIONS NEED TO BE BASED UPON ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS.
THE RIGHT CHARACTERISTICS THAT MAKES SOMETHING BELONG TO A CERTAIN CONCEPT
• 6. DEFINITIONS OUGHT (AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE) TO AVOID NEGATIVE DEFINITIONS. [WHAT A CONCEPT IS NOT]
ACTIVITY
• WHILE IN THE EASTERN TRADITION, THE GAP BETWEEN THE MYTHOS AND THE LOGOS IS
BLURRED; IN THE WESTERN TRADITION, THAT GAP IS STRIKING.
BEGINNINGS OF DOING PHILOSOPHY
• MILESIAN PHILOSOPHERS (THEY STARTED IT)
• THALES (ARCHE: WATER)
• ANAXIMENES (ARCHE: AIR)
• ANAXIMANDER (ARCHE: APEIRON/ NOTHINGNESS)
• ARCHE – A THING THAT IS IN ALL THINGS
• OTHER PHILOSOPHERS (WHO ALSO STARTED IT)
• PYTHAGORAS (DEVELOPMENT OF MOST OF MATHEMATICS)
• EUCLID OF ALEXANDRIA (DEVELOPMENT OF GEOMETRY)
BEGINNINGS OF DOING PHILOSOPHY
• MONIST PHILOSOPHERS (PLURALITY IS AN ILLUSION)
• PARMENIDES (“ALL IS ONE, ONE IS ALL”)
• ZENO OF ELEA (PARADOXES IN PLURALITY)
• PLURALIST PHILOSOPHERS (PLURALITY RULES)
• HERACLITUS (CHANGE IS CONSTANT; ARCHE: CHANGE)
• ANAXAGORAS (LOVE AND STRIFE AS DIVISOR OF ALL THINGS)
• EMPEDOCLES (ARCHE: EARTH, AIR, FIRE AND WIND)
BEGINNINGS OF DOING PHILOSOPHY
• LATER PLURALIST PHILOSOPHERS
• LEUCIPPUS & DEMOCRITUS (ATOMS)
• THE SOPHISTS
• PROTAGORAS (“MAN IS THE MEASURE OF ALL THINGS”)
• GORGIAS (“NOTHING IS TRUE”)
• THRASYMACHUS (“MIGHT IS RIGHT”)
BEGINNINGS OF DOING PHILOSOPHY
Undergraduate:
Familiarization
Science/ Masters:
‘Study’ Mastering
Systematic Doctoral: Rigorous Practice
Method PhD: Rigorous Philosophical Practice
Philosophy:
Problems and
Solutions Return to
Philosophy
APPROACH IN DOING PHILOSOPHY
• HOW DO WE UNDERSTAND PSYCHOLOGY/SOCIOLOGY/ANTHROPOLOGY? THROUGH
BIOLOGY.
• HOW DO WE UNDERSTAND BIOLOGY? THROUGH CHEMISTRY.
• HOW DO WE UNDERSTAND CHEMISTRY? THROUGH PHYSICS.
• HOW DO WE UNDERSTAND PHYSICS? THROUGH MATHEMATICS.
• HOW DO WE UNDERSTAND MATHEMATICS? THROUGH PHILOSOPHY.
APPROACH IN DOING PHILOSOPHY
•CHARACTERISTICS OF A PHILOSOPHIC QUESTION
• BROAD
• FROM EPISTEMOLOGICAL TO ETHICAL TO METAPHYSICAL, AND SO ON.
• NO SINGLE METHODOLOGY IN DERIVING AN ANSWER
• NOT OBJECTIVE AND NOT SUBJECTIVE; TO ANSWER WITH A PRESCRIBED METHOD IS TO DO SCIENCE.
• TENDS TO BE IMPORTANT
• IT SEEKS THE FUNDAMENTAL AND THE COMPREHENSIVE.
APPROACH IN DOING PHILOSOPHY
•FIRST ORDER VS SECOND ORDER INQUIRY
• FIRST ORDER INQUIRY “PLAY BY THE RULES”. IT FOLLOWS AN EXACT METHOD
• SECOND ORDER INQUIRY INQUIRES UPON THAT EXACT METHOD. IT DEVIATES ITSELF AWAY FROM THE
RULES. THIS MAKES THE DISCIPLINE A ‘META-DISCIPLINE’. SECOND ORDER INQUIRY IS PHILOSOPHY
•THE SAME DISTINCTION CAN BE MADE BETWEEN SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY (FIRST ORDER) AND
PHILOSOPHIC INQUIRY (SECOND ORDER).
ACTIVITY