Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Thermal Dissipation
Thermal Dissipation
ME 450: Computer Aided Engineering Analysis Instructor: Dr. Nema Group Members: Wei-Yuan Chu, Brad Holtsclaw, Nick Metzger, Breanne Walters
Objectives
Maximize Thermal Dissipation by Designing a Fin System that will Draw Heat Away from the Engine Casing Using Aluminum Alloy and Carbon Steel as Materials, we will analyze which material makes a better fin.
Introduction
Engine is used to run a small blower It is assumed that the motor casing will be subjected to cooling by a fan or other suitable ventilation. Main area of concern is drawing heat into the fin system in order to dissipate it into the air.
Complete Assembly
Area of Interest
Theoretical Background
y y y y
E in E g E out ! E st
dT dT dT ) q ! k(T ! k (i j k dr dJ dz
''
Si !
Xj X l
Sj !
X Xi l
q '' ! h (Tg Ts )
A f ! 2 wL c
Lc ! L
Lf !
t 2
Solid Models were created in Pro-Engineer and Converted to IGES Files to Import into Ansys
Boundary Conditions
Ambient Temperature of 10oC Film Coefficient of 100 W/m*oC (for cooling airspeed of 10 m/s)
Results and Discussion: S.S. Temperature Distribution (Type I) Steel Top Fins
Results and Discussion: S.S. Temperature Distribution (Type I) Aluminum Top Fins
Results and Discussion: S.S. Temperature Distribution (Type II) Steel Top Fins
Results and Discussion: S.S. Temperature Distribution (Type II) Aluminum Top Fins
Results and Discussion: S.S. Temperature Distribution (Type III) Steel Top and Side Fins
Results and Discussion: S.S. Temperature Distribution (Type III) Aluminum Top and Side Fins
Results and Discussion: Transient Response (Type III) Aluminum Top and Side Fins
Length (m)
Steel Top Fins Length (m) thickness (midth (m) w 0.019 0.002 0.210 Af Ab At 0.008 0.013 0.064 Aluminum Top Fins Length (m) thickness (midth (m) w 0.019 0.002 0.210 Af Ab At 0.008 0.013 0.064
0.423
k 100.000 53.000 b qt 0.632 55.410 651.498 k 100.000 252.000 b qt 0.290 55.410 679.434 h
0.423
Length (m)
Steel Side Fins Length (m) thickness (midth (m) w 0.051 0.004 0.229 Af Ab At 0.024 0.010 0.083 Aluminum Side Fins w Length (m) thickness (midth (m) 0.051 0.004 0.229 Af Ab At 0.024 0.010 0.083
Results and Discussion: Heat Transfer Comparison for Type III Design
Total Heat Transferred by Aluminum Fins Top Fins (W) 679.434 Side Fins (W) 801.786 Total (W) 1481.220
Total Heat Transferred by Steel Fins Top Fins (W) 651.498 Side Fins (W) 583.892 Total (W) 1235.390 q (W) 245.830
Impact Statements
The Addition of Fins will Aid in the Heat Dissipation from the Motor Casing, making the Part More Safe for General Use Motor Casing with Type III Fins Will have a Reduced Surface Temperature and Less of a Chance of Overheating the Interior Electronics and Causing a Fire
Conclusions
Total Heat Transferred from Aluminum Fin is 245.83 W Greater than that from the Steel Fin. Efficiency for Aluminum Fin is Greater than that of Steel. Aluminum is the Best Choice for the Fin Material.
References
Nematollahi, Khosrow. "Oncourse, ME 450." Scheduled Reading and Assignments. IUPUI. 23 Apr 2007 <https://oncourse.iu.edu/access/content/user/knematol/Filemanager_Public_Fil es/ME450LectureNotesCh13r>. Incropera, Frank, David Dewitt, and Theodore Bergman. Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer. 6th. Hoboken NJ: Wilet & Sons, 2007. Rengifo, Gustavo. "Oncourse, ME 546." ME 546 Resources, Project #1. IUPUI. 23 Apr 2007 <https://oncourse.iu.edu/access/content/group/SP07-IN-ME-54626532/Lab%20Projects/Project%>.
Questions