Professional Documents
Culture Documents
04 PMBOK5 Integration R1
04 PMBOK5 Integration R1
Management
Project Integration Management
Ma
Project Integration Management includes the processes
akt
and activities to identify, define, combine, unify, and
me
coordinate the various processes and project
ber
management activities within the Project Management
Gru
Process Groups.
Ma
me
Project Integration Management includes:
•making choices about resource allocation, me
•making trade-offs among competing objectives and ber
me
alternatives, and,
•managing the interdependencies among the project Pen
management Knowledge Areas.
CHAPTER 4
It documents:
•the business needs,
•assumptions,
•constraints,
•the understanding of the customer’s needs and high-
level requirements, and
•the new product, service, or result that it is intended
to satisfy
Piagam proyek adalah dokumen yang dikeluarkan oleh
Project Charter (Typical outline)
• Project purpose or justification,
• Measurable project objectives and related success criteria,
• High-level requirements,
• Assumptions and constraints,
• High-level project description and boundaries,
• High-level risks,
• Summary milestone schedule,
• Summary budget,
• Stakeholder list,
• Project approval requirements (i.e., what constitutes project
success, who decides the project is successful, and who signs
off on the project),
• Assigned project manager, responsibility, and authority
level, and
• Name and authority of the sponsor or other person(s)
authorizing the project charter.
• Tujuan atau pembenaran proyek,
Function of Project Charter
The project charter establishes a partnership between the
performing and requesting organizations.
• Meetings are used to discuss and address pertinent topics of the• Rapat
project when directing and managing project work. proyek
• Attendees at the meetings may include the project manager, the • Peserta
project team and appropriate stakeholders involved or affected by peman
the topics addressed. oleh to
• Each attendee should have a defined role to ensure appropriate • Setiap
participation. mema
• Meetings tend to be one of three types: • Rapat
• Information exchange; • Pertuk
• Brainstorming, option evaluation, or design; or • Brains
• Decision making. • Penga
Meetings (cont.) [Tools]
• Meeting types should not be mixed as a best practice. • Jen
• Meetings should be prepared with a well-defined agenda, • Ra
purpose, objective, and time frame and should be appropriately ke
documented with meeting minutes and action items. did
tin
• Meeting minutes should be stored as defined in the project
management plan. • No
ren
• Meetings are most effective when all participants can be face-to-
face in the same location. • Ra
lok
• Virtual meetings can be held using audio and/ or video
conferencing tools, but generally require additional preparation • Ra
and organization to achieve the same effectiveness of a face-to- au
face meeting. da
da
4.4 Monitor and control Project Work
Process Description Key Benefits Key Outputs
• The cost forecasts are derived from progress against the cost
baseline and computed estimates to complete (ETC).
• This is typically expressed in terms of cost variance (CV) and cost
performance index (CPI).
• An estimate at completion (EAC) can be compared to the budget
at completion (BAC) to see if the project is still within tolerance
ranges or if a change request is required.
• For projects not using earned value management, variances
against the planned versus actual expenditures and forecasted
final costs are provided.
• Prakiraan biaya diturunkan dari kemajuan terhadap baseline
biaya dan perkiraan yang dihitung untuk diselesaikan (ETC).
• Ini biasanya dinyatakan dalam varians biaya (CV) dan indeks
kinerja biaya (CPI).
•
Validated Changes [Input]
• All of the Monitoring and Controlling processes and many of• Semua
the Executing processes produce change requests as an proses
output. sebagai
• Change requests may include corrective action, preventive • Permin
action, and defect repairs. However, corrective and tindaka
preventive actions do not normally affect the project baselines korekti
—only the performance against the baselines. baselin
Fault tree analysis (FTA) is a top down, deductive failure analysis in which an undesired state of a system is
analyzed using Boolean logic to combine a series of lower-level events. This analysis method is mainly used in the
fields of safety engineering and reliability engineering to understand how systems can fail, to identify the best ways
to reduce risk or to determine (or get a feeling for) event rates of a safety accident or a particular system level
(functional) failure. FTA is used in the aerospace, nuclear power, chemical and process,[1][2][3] pharmaceutical,
petrochemical and other high-hazard industries; but is also used in fields as diverse as risk factor identification
relating to social service system failure.[4]
In aerospace, the more general term "system Failure Condition" is used for the "undesired state" / Top event of the
fault tree. These conditions are classified by the severity of their effects. The most severe conditions require the
most extensive fault tree analysis. These "system Failure Conditions" and their classification are often previously
determined in the functional Hazard analysis.