Analysis (Test of Hypothesis)

ANOVA
  MS F Significance F
Regressio
 Step 1: H0=Production has no significant n 2388651.543 7.7828E+31 0

association with wastage. Residual 3.06915E-26

 H1=Production has significant
association with wastage.
 Step 2: α=0.05
 Step 3: F-test statistic will be used
Total      
Here P-value = 0
Since P-value (0) < α (.05), so Ho is rejected.
Comment: It can be said that there is significant relationship
between production and wastage.
 Regression Analysis
SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
Multiple R 1
In this study we modeled the following
Adjusted R Square 1
equation: Observations 36
Y= α + β1X1
Where Y= Wastage 4.5%(KG) of T-Shirt.
α= intercept.   Coefficients
X1=T-Shirt Production. Intercept -4.54747E-13
TSP/M 0.00375
Types of Wastages

Wastage 4.5%(KG)

0.50%

0.80%
2.00%

1.20%

Wastage of Dyeing Wastage of Cutting Wastage of Sewing Wastage of Finishing

Wastage Reduction Plan (Dyeing)

Reason of Dyeing Wastage

1. Due to proper Shade variation due to proper RND
2. Heat setting due to improper training
3. Pulling yearn due to poor maintenance of machine
4. Spot due to proper handling or Storing of Fabric

Plan of Action to reduce Dyeing Wastage up to 1%

1. Strong RND Department has to be developed & need to trained manpower
2. To reduce the wastage, need to train employee
3. Machine has to be maintained on a continuous basis
4. Proper storing has to be maintained & people need to train on how to handle
Fabric
 Cutting,Sewing & Finishing

Reason of Cutting Wastage

1. Due to the manual process
2. Semi-Skilled manpower
Reason of Finishing Wastage
Plan of Action to reduce Dyeing Wastage up to 0.5%
1. Due to proper knowledge of packing /ironing
1. Automation has to be implemented
2. Semi-Skilled manpower
2. Has to be trained Marker Man properly
Plan of Action to reduce Finishing Wastage up to 0.2%
1. To train the iron man
2. Workers have to be trained properly to reduce the unproductive hour/ proper
handling time of product
Reason of Sewing Wastage

1. Due to unavailability of auto machine (threat cutting)

2. Semi-Skilled manpower

Plan of Action to reduce Sewing Wastage upto 0.3%

1. Automation has to be implemented

2. Workers have to be trained properly to reduce the unproductive hour/ proper
handling time of product
Result

Wastage 2%(KG)

0.002; 10%

 Total 2% wastage to be reduced 0.003; 15%

Wastage of Dyeing
Wastage of Cutting
Wastage of Sewing
0.01; 50% Wastage of Finishing

0.005; 25%