Respondent Fernandez agreed to sell parcels of land owned by respondents to petitioners. However, Fernandez's cousin said he was not selling his share of the land since there were tenants. Fernandez then informed petitioners the sale would not push through. The court ruled there was no perfected contract of sale because Fernandez did not have a special power of attorney in writing authorizing her to sell the property, as required by law, and she denied being authorized by the owners to sell.
Respondent Fernandez agreed to sell parcels of land owned by respondents to petitioners. However, Fernandez's cousin said he was not selling his share of the land since there were tenants. Fernandez then informed petitioners the sale would not push through. The court ruled there was no perfected contract of sale because Fernandez did not have a special power of attorney in writing authorizing her to sell the property, as required by law, and she denied being authorized by the owners to sell.
Respondent Fernandez agreed to sell parcels of land owned by respondents to petitioners. However, Fernandez's cousin said he was not selling his share of the land since there were tenants. Fernandez then informed petitioners the sale would not push through. The court ruled there was no perfected contract of sale because Fernandez did not have a special power of attorney in writing authorizing her to sell the property, as required by law, and she denied being authorized by the owners to sell.
• In 19965, Alimario who worked as brokers, offered to sell to the
petitioners, Sps. Litonjua, parcels of land. The petitioners and respondent Fernandez, who is allegedly acting as agents of the respondent-owners, agreed that the petitioners would buy the property. Also, it was agreed that respondent Fernandez would present a special power of attorney executed by the owners of the property, authorizing her to sell the property for and in their behalf. Facts: • Hoewever, respondent was told by her cousin that he was not selling his share since there were already tenants on the said lands. Hence, respondent Fernandez wrote the petitioners informing them that they thereby changed their mind and that the sale will no longer push through. Issue: • Whether or not there was a perfected contract of sale between the parties? Ruling • No. • ART. 1878. Special powers of attorney are necessary in the following cases: … (5) To enter into any contract by which the ownership of an immovable is transmitted or acquired either gratuitously or for a valuable consideration; Ruling: • In this case, respondent Fernandez specifically denied that she was authorized by the respondents-owners to sell the properties, both in her answer to the complaint and when she testified and, no evidence on record that the respondents-owners ratified all the actuations of respondent Fernandez in connection with her dealings with the petitioners. • Hence, Any sale of real property by one purporting to be the agent of the registered owner without any authority therefor in writing from the said owner is null and void.