Comparative Analysis of structure using Different Structural Softwears

Prepared By:
Nirav Zala- (2101070300001)

M.Tech IIIrd Semester

Internal Guide: Amrish Sir External Guide:
Name (IF ANY)
Asst./Asso. Professor
SOCET/ASOIT, Ahmedabad

Silver Oak University

OUTLINE
 Problem Definition. ( 1 slide)
 Motivation (1 slide)
 Literature Review ( 2 slides)
 Orientation of Work (Flow of your whole work)
 Introduction of DISSERTATION (only one slide)
 Progress with Implementation
 Conclusion & Future Scope
 Bibliography
PROBLEM DEFINITION

 In ETABS we get very economic design of structure and its also

useful in uneven shape structures.
 STADD PRO is used for even shape structure designs and for
uneven structures its too heavy .
 So both software are used in different condition and have
different type of user interface.
 Basically we are going to do is, we take a multi story regular
structure for study with both software.
 Modeling, analysis and design of the structure is done
separately on both STAAD Pro and ETABS .
ABSTRACT

 Structural analysis is mainly used for finding out the behaviour

of a structure when subjected to some loading.
 Earthquakes, in which many reinforced concrete structures have
been severely damaged or collapsed, indicated the need for
evaluate and increase the Seismic performance of buildings.
 Buildings with symmetry and asymmetry in plan,
geometry, strength, stiffness.
 Structural design of buildings for seismic loads is very important
for structuralsafety during major ground motions.
 Analysis of major earthquakes have shown that the irregular
distribution of mass,stiffness and strengths i.e. unsymmetrical
buildings may cause serious damage in structural systems.
LITERATURE REVIEW
 Comparative study of simulation tools Staad V8, Etabs 2013, and Strap
2014 for seismic analysis of plan and vertical geometrically irregular
building using Indian Standard Codes
 Mandar Pandurang Ganbavale
 Comparative Study on Analysis and Design of Regular Configuration of
Building by Staad.Pro and Etabs
 Mohammad Kalim1
 Abdul Rehman2
 B S Tyagi3
 Comparison of design results of a Structure designed using STAAD and
ETABS Software
 Prashanth
 Anshuman
 Pandey
 Arpan Herbert
ORIENTATION OF WORK

 The whole work has done as following

1) Making AutoCAD model of building and getting its column location

and beam framing details.
2) Making AutoCAD model of building and getting its column location
and beam framing details.
3) Generating model in ETABS and STADD pro and
compare its results.
FLOW OF DISSERTATION
G
e
F
n
A
u
it
e
o
rn
C
G
A
a
e
D
n
tle
rD
r
ia
tia
zi
wn
n
g
e
g
n
g
S
t
a
a
n
S
E
d
d
d
t
S
P
re
r
ctia
o
o
u
b
n
m
scdl
a
o

tlr
D
e

u
m
a
w
i
r
o
n
g
e
d
e
l

C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n

o
f

b
o
t
h

r
e
s
u
l
t
s
INTRODUCTION TO DISSERTATION

 STAADPro and ETABS are the present day leading design

softwares in the market.
 Many design companies use these softwares for their project
design purposes.
 So, this project mainly deals with the comparative analysis of the results
obtained from the design of a regular (as per IS 1893) multi storey building
structure when designed using STAADPro and ETABS softwares separately.
 These results will also be compared with manual calculations of a sample beam
and column of the same structure designed as per IS 456.
INTRODUCTION TO ETABS & STADD PRO

 ETABS
 The innovative and revolutionary new ETABS is the ultimate integrated
software package for the structural analysis and design of buildings.
 Incorporating 40 years of continuous research and development, this latest
ETABS offers unmatched 3D object based modeling and visualization tools,
blazingly fast linear and nonlinear analytical power, sophisticated and
comprehensive design capabilities for a wide-range of materials, and
insightful graphic displays, reports, and schematic drawings that allow users
to quickly and easily decipher and understand analysis and design results.
INTRODUCTION TO ETABS & STADD PRO

 STADD PRO
 STAAD.Pro allows structural engineers to analyze and design virtually any type of structure through
its flexible modeling environment, advanced features and fluent data collaboration.
 Flexible modeling is provided by a state-of-the-art graphical environment and the design supports
over 70 international codes and over 20 U.S. codes in 7 languages.
 An array of advanced structural analysis and design features are included such as nuclear
certification for 10CFR Part 50, 10CFR 21, ASME NQA-1-2000, time history and push over analysis
and cable (linear and non-linear) analysis.
TYPICAL PLAN OF BUILDING
SECTIONS OF PLAN
SECTIONS OF PLAN
COLUMN LOCATION
COLUMN LOCATION & BEAM FRAMING(MODEL)
 CONCLUSION

 At these stage I made autoCAD file of structure and made required

section for detail study and to get position of column location and
beam framing.
 Remaing part :
 Etabs model
 Stadd pro model
 Comparision of both results
REFERENCES

 Bureau of Indian Standards: IS-875, part 1 (1987), Dead Loads on

Buildings and Structures, New Delhi, India.Comparative Study on
Analysis and Design of Regular Configuration of Building by Staad.Pro
and Etabs.
 Bureau of Indian Standards: IS-875, part 2 (1987), Live Loads on
Buildings and Structures, New Delhi, India.
 Bureau of Indian Standards: IS-1893, part 1 (2002), Criteria for
Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures: Part 1 General provisions
and Buildings, New Delhi, India.
 Thank You