Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prezentare Palbo - V18Nov2022
Prezentare Palbo - V18Nov2022
PALBO01/2021
CONTENTS
1. METASTATIC BREAST
CANCER
2. STUDY IDENTIFICATION
3. STUDY DRUG
4. STUDY OBJECTIVES
5. STUDY POPULATION
6. STUDY EXTENSION
7. CASE REPORT FORMS
8. STUDY STATISTICS
METASTATIC BREAST CANCER
Cardoso F, Spence D, Mertz S, Corneliussen-James D, Sabelko K, Gralow J, et al. Global analysis of advanced/metastatic breast cancer: Decade report (2005-2015). Breast
Edinb Scotl. 2018 Jun;39:131–8.
Oprean CM, Negru SM, Popovici DI, Saftescu S, Han R-A, Dragomir G-M, et al. Postmenopausal Breast Cancer in Women, Clinical and Epidemiological Factors Related to the
Molecular Subtype: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Single Institution for 13 Years. Follow-Up Data. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan;17(23):8722.
METASTATIC BREAST CANCER
Benefit of screening: Breast cancer mortality (Barbeau et al, 2017)
Age Relative Absolute Number needed GRADE Rating of
Risk** effect/ 1,000 to screen (95% Certainty of
screened CI) Evidence
(95% CI) median 7
yrs (95% CI)
40-49 0.85 0.58 fewer 1,724 ⨁⨁◯◯
(1,176 to 3,704) LOW
(0.78 to 0.93) (0.27 to 0.85
fewer)
50-59 0.85 0.75 fewer 1,333 ⨁◯◯◯
VERY LOW
(0.78 to 0.93) (0.35 to 1.10 (909 to 2,857)
fewer)
60-69 0.85 0.92 fewer 1,087 ⨁⨁◯◯
LOW
(0.78 to 0.93) (0.43 to 1.35 (741 to 2,326)
fewer)
70-74 0.85 1.55 fewer 645 ⨁◯◯◯
VERY LOW
(0.78 to 0.93) (0.72 to 2.27 (441 to 1,389)
fewer)
STUDY IDENTIFICATION
Status Study Title Conditions Interventions Locations
Recruiting Non-Interventional, National Study Of Metastatic Drug: Asociatia Oncohelp - Centrul
Real-World Evidence In Estrogen Breast Palbociclib de Oncologie Oncohelp,
Receptor Positive, Her2 Negative Cancer Timisoara, Timiș, Romania
Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Spitalul Clinic de Obstetrică
Treated With Palbociclib During a 2.5 și Ginecologie Filantropia,
Years Follow-Up Period Bucuresti, Romania
Institutul Oncologic "Prof. Dr
I. Chiricuta", Cluj-Napoca,
Romania
Centrul de Oncologie "Sf.
Sponsor: Dr. Cristina Oprean, ASOCIATIA ONCOHELP Nectarie", Craiova, Romania
Timisoara Institutul Regional de
Oncologie, Iaşi, Romania
Spitalul Clinic Județean de
Main objective: to investigate the safety and efficacy profile of Urgență Oradea ,
IBRANCE® in the real-world setting of clinical practice Oradea, Romania
TREATMENT DURATION
Recommended dose
One dose/day 125 mg
Complete
for 21 7 days off
cycle of 28
consecutive treatment
days
days
Safety objective
Monitoring of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia
(absolute neutrophil count/L), grade 3 and 4
treatment-related thrombocytopenia,
grade 3 and 4 treatment-related anemia,
grade 3 and 4 treatment-related elevated
liver enzymes, grade 3 and 4 fatigue,
grade 3 and 4 upper respiratory
infections, grade 3 and 4 nausea and
grade 3 and 4 treatment-related toxicities
as defined in CTCAE v5.0.
STUDY POPULATION
Participants Excluded
650
• Participants with advanced,
Participants symptomatic, visceral spread, such
as patients with massive
Patients will be identified by means uncontrolled effusions (pleural,
of data extracted from the centres. pericardial, peritoneal), pulmonary
lymphangitis, and over 50% liver
1. Documentation of histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer with IHC
of estrogen receptor (ER) expression > 1% and/or progesterone receptor (PR) expression >1 %
involvement).
breast cancer based on local laboratory results. • Palbociclib treatment as part of a
2. Scoring of 0 or 1+ for HER2 protein expression by a validated immunohistochemistry assay or clinical trial or prescription prior to
+1/+2 with negative HER2 amplification FISH/ISH ratio lower than 1.8 or HER2 gene copy less
than 4.0. market approval (Nov 2016).
3. Eligible participants must have undergone a treatment with Palbociclib for at least 3 months.
4. Evaluable disease as defined per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours
(mRECIST) V1.1 criterion (at least 2 entries).
Treatment with Palbociclib
5. Premenopausal or postmenopausal status.
• First-line therapy (LOT1), if
• no prior systemic treatment for MBC or at least 1
a. Patients who are not postmenopausal must have undergone a treatment with LHRH year from the completion of adjuvant endocrine
agonist.
b. Postmenopausal status is defined as:
therapy.
o prior bilateral surgical oophorectomy, or
• Second-line therapy (LOT2), if
o spontaneous cessation of regular menses for at least 12 consecutive months • given post progression on a first-line treatment for
MBC or on relapse at or within 1 year from the end
in case of doubt serum estradiol <20 umol/l and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels >15 IU/L.
of adjuvant hormone therapy.
STUDY EXTENSION
41 – 50 years 4 8.00 % 10
51 – 60 years 8 16.00 %
61 – 70 years 23 46.00 %
5
> 70 years 10 20.00 %
TOTAL 50 100.00 %
The average age at the time of diagnosis was 60.10 0
years, with an interval between 29 and 77 years. 29-40 years 41-50 years 51-60 years 61-70 years over 70 years
From the total of 50 patients studied, 68.00% come from the urban environment,
while 32.00% come from the rural environment.
Regarding the history of the disease, 58.00% of the patients have recurrent
cancer, 40.00% de novo, while for one patient (2.00%) the history is unknown.
STUDY STATISTICS – HISTOLOGICAL & MOLECULAR SUBTYPE
26 out of 50 patients presented Luminal B molecular subtype,
From the analyzed data, 74% of the patients
whilst 22 presented Luminal A molecular subtype. One patient
presented ductal subtype as histological
presented Luminal HER+ molecular subtype and for one
subtype, 12% lobular and 14% other.
patient data was unknown.
No of No. of
Histological Molecular
patients Percent (%) patients Percent (%)
Subtype Subtype
N = 50 N = 50
Ductal 37 74.00% LUMINAL A 22 44.00 %
Lobular 6 12.00% LUMINAL B 26 52.00 %
NST 5 10.00 % LUMINAL HER+ 1 2.00 %
Unknown 2 4.00 % Unknown 1 2.00 %
TOTAL 50 100.00% TOTAL 50 100.00 %
40 30
35 25
30
20
25
20 15 Column1
Column1
15 10
10
5
5
0 0
Ductal Lobular NST Unknown Luminal A Luminal B HER+ Unknown
STUDY STATISTICS – ESTROGEN RECEPTOR LEVEL
45
30
25
Column1
Estrogen No. of 20
5
< 10 % 6 12.00 %
0
10 – 50 % 3 6.00 % < 10% 10-50% > 50%
> 50 % 41 82.00 %
TOTAL 50 100.00 %
STUDY STATISTICS – PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR LEVEL
35
20
Column1
Progesterone No. of 15
Receptor patients Percent (%)
10
Level N = 50
5
< 10 % 5 10.00 %
0
10 – 50 % 0 0.00 % < 10% > 50% Unknown
> 50 % 29 58.00 %
Unknown 16 32.00 %
TOTAL 50 100.00 %
STUDY STATISTICS – LOCATION OF METASTASES
Tissue Pulmonary
No. of Liver
Metastases No. of cases Metastases No. of cases
cases Metastases
Locations Locations
Bone lesions 5 Bilateral metastasis 2 Multiple lesions 2
Multiple
Bone metastases 11 Pulmonary lesions 4 4
metastases
Bone tissue 11 Pulmonary metastases 4 One lesion 1
Breast node 1 Pulmonary
1 4.5
Breast tumor 1 micronodules
Chest 1 Lymphatic 4
1 3.5
The most encountered tissue metastases carcinomatosis
were bone metastases and metastases Pleural effusion 3 3
located in bone tissue. 2.5
Subpleural nodules 1
12 2 Column1
4
10 1.5
3
8 1
2
6 0.5
4 1 0
Multiple Multiple One lesion
2 Column1 0 Column1 lesions metastases
is ns es s is n es
0 t as sio tas dule tos usio dul
as le tas no a ff o
s s e e or est et r y om a l e al n
i on ase ssu nod m e r o n
s t ti u Ch l m na m ic ci r r
le tas e st
stt e ra mo ary y m car le u leu
ne e n ea a t l
on na atic
r P bp
Bo e m Bo Br Bre Bi
la Pu
m o Su
n u l m p h
l
Bo P
Pu Lym
STUDY STATISTICS – OTHER METASTASES
10
9
Other 10 types of metastases were declared by the study 8
7
patients and included in the analyzed data, as presented below:
6
5
Type of Metastasis No. of cases 4
3
AXILLARY 7 2
LYMPHADENOPATHY 1
HILAR 3 0
Y S E S Y N Y ES S S
LIMPHADENOPATHIES H IE D N H IA H S N SI
AT TH
O I O A T R A T
TA ES
IO A Column1
LYMPHNODE 9 O
P A H
N
ES O P VA O P S A ST
P P L O A L T
LYTIC BONE LESIONS 1 EN N O YM N E EN EN ET IC ME
D E L D D M N
A D BO H A A E LE NE
MEADIASTINAL 5 PH H A C P P H U P
M P TI YM M
IS
S S BO
LYMPHADENOPATHY LY LIM LY _L LY T A L
R
Y R 0b AL F T N
OVARIAN 2 A A 0 E R
ILL H
IL
_ x0 C
H SO TE
PARATRACHEAL 2 A S
AX AL T R
LYMPHADENOPATHY I N A
A ST A R
SOFT TISSUE 1 I P
A D
METASTASES E
M
SPLENIC LESIONS 1
STERNAL BONE 1
METASTASIS
STUDY STATISTICS – CORELATIONS
35
The correlation between the age groups and the molecular subtype
showed an inversely proportional relationship between the two
variables but it was declared as statistically insignificant 30
(r = -0.280; p > 0.05).
25
Molecular Subtype
20
Age at Luminal
Luminal A Luminal B TOTAL
diagnosis HER+ 15
29 – 50 1 8 0 9
10
years 11.11 % 88.89 % 0.00 % 100.00 %
51 – 70 14 16 0 30 5
Tumoral 25
Age at diagnosis TOTAL
grade
29 – 40 41 – 50 51 – 60 61 – 70 > 70
20
1 0 0 3 2 6
G1
16.67 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 50.00 % 33.33 % 100.00 %
15
3 4 5 15 6 33
G2
9.09 % 12.12 % 15.15 % 45.45 % 18.18 % 100.00 %
10
1 0 0 1 2 4
G3
25.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 25.00 % 50.00 % 100.00 %
5
0 0 0 0 0 0
G4
0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
0
29 – 40 years 41 – 50 years 51 – 60 years 61 – 70 years > 70 years
0 0 0 2 3 5
Gx G1 G2 G3 G4 Gx
0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 40.00 % 60.00 % 100.00 %