Research Opportunities at The Interface of Dental and Medical Informatics

You might also like

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 51

Research opportunities at the interface of dental and medical informatics

Titus Schleyer, DMD, PhD


(with help from Mei Song, PhD) University of Washington School of Dentistry - Department of Oral Medicine & School of Medicine Biomedical and Health Informatics

August 2, 2011
MacDonald Lake, Glacier Park Titus Schleyer 2001

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

Todays talk
is intended to be more of a discussion than a talk. is not just about medical and dental informatics. may create some (healthy) tension . hopefully will make you rethink some prior beliefs.
Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

2 of 52

Topics
how informatics (and healthcare) are organized the One patient how health records are organized suggestions for integrative research
standards information presentation and usability decision support for distributed care

discussion and outlook


Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine 3 of 52

How informatics (and healthcare) are organized


Basic Research

Medical Informatics Methods, Techniques, and Theories

Applied Research

Bioinformatics

Imaging Informatics

Clinical Informatics

Public Health Informatics

Molecular and Cellular Processes


Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

Tissues and Organs

Individuals (Patients)

Populations and Society

Shortliffe EH, Johnson SB. Medical informatics training and research at Columbia University. IMIA Yearbook 2002;173-180.

4 of 52

Basic Research
Basic Research

Basic Research Basic Research

Medical Informatics Methods, Techniques, and Methods, Dental InformaticsTheories Techniques, and Theories Nursing Informatics Methods, Techniques, and Methods, Other Informatics Theories Techniques, and Theories

Applied Research Applied Research Applied Research Applied Research

Bioinformatics Bioinformatics
Molecular and Bioinformatics Cellular Molecular and Processes Bioinformatics Cellular Molecular and Processes Cellular Molecular and Processes Cellular Processes

Imaging Informatics Imaging Informatics Imaging Tissues and Informatics Organs Imaging Tissues and Informatics
Organs Tissues and Organs Tissues and Organs

Clinical Informatics Clinical Informatics Clinical Individuals Informatics (Patients) Clinical Individuals Informatics (Patients)
Individuals (Patients) Individuals (Patients)

Public Health Informatics Public Health Informatics Public Health Populations Informatics and Society Public Health Populations Informatics and Society
Populations and Society Populations and Society

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

5 of 52

The One patient

healthy dentition

early childhood caries (ECC)


Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine 6 of 52

Early childhood caries: The actors


O: ON: GD: P: PN: PD: PDN: Obstetrician Obstetric Nurse General Dentist Pediatrician Pediatric Nurse Pediatric Dentist Pediatric Dental Hygienist
7 of 52

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

Recommended early dental interventions


Childs Age Prenatal/Perinatal HC professional(s) Clinical maternal dental hygiene limit salivary contact mothers oral health (e.g. pregnancyassociated gingivitis) mother: nutrition, oral hygiene childs sugar intake schedule dental exam at 6 months age mother: optimal fluoride levels caries-risk assessment disabilities and caries risk window of infectivity: 7 months to 36 months eruption of deciduous teeth caries/oral hygiene assessment mother: nutrition, oral hygiene early childhood caries particularly prevalent 12 to 18 months possible restorative interventions child may start on fluoride toothpaste oral hygiene instruction for child pediatric care vital if no dental care O, ON, GD

Neonatal

ON

6 months

P, PN, PD, PDH

7 months

P, PN, PD, PDH

1 year

P and/or PD

18 months

PD

2 years

P, PN, PD, PDH

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

8 of 52

Some other examples of intersecting interests


diabetes, cardiovascular disease and periodontal disease prenatal care, periodontal disease and low birth weight post-radiation and bisphosphonate-caused osteonecrosis oral cancer screening, tobacco and alcohol oral hygiene and respiratory infections kidney disease and periodontal disease and many more
Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine 9 of 52

A timely book

http://www.springer.com/public+health/book/978-1-4471-2184-8
Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine 10 of 52

How health records are organized

Margate, New Jersey T. Schleyer 1999

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

11 of 52

Electronic records: Medicine

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

12 of 52

Electronic records: Dentistry

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

13 of 52

One integrated model: Veterans Administration

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

14 of 52

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

15 of 52

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

16 of 52

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

17 of 52

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

18 of 52

Advantages
eliminate dual entry of clinical information into separate medical and dental systems integrate dental progress note creation with CPRS transactional recording of data in a computable format bidirectional information exchange allowing for improved clinical decision support
Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine 19 of 52

Suggestions for integrative research

Natchez Trace, Mississippi T. Schleyer 2001

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

20 of 52

Standards

Grand Tetons, Wyoming T. Schleyer 2001

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

21 of 52

Order from chaos the Dental Information Model (DIM)


Acharya A, Mital DP, Schleyer TK. Electronic dental records information model. International Journal of Medical Engineering and Informatics 2009;1(4):418-34.

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

22 of 52

Order from chaos - an information model for general dentistry


extract data from ~100 de-identified patient records combine with results from previous studies validate information item list (~1,100 fields) through Delphi study construct information model

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

23 of 52

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

24 of 52

What can you do with an information model?


Database User interface

Data interchange Forms

Information model Research


Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

National Health Information Infrastructure/ Health Information Exchange


25 of 52

The DIM on the Web

http://www.dentalinformatics.org/projectdirectory/dim/

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

26 of 52

Research suggestions
determine cross-discipline information needs map corresponding records and fields homogenize needed vocabularies/ ontologies implement and assess, build out from there
Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

27 of 52

Information presentation and usability

Logan Pass, Glacier National Park T. Schleyer 2001

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

28 of 52

Usability of four dental computerbased patient records


Research questions:
Which usability problems are common in dental software? What is the rate of completed, incorrectly completed and incomplete user tasks?

Thyvalikakath T et al. Usability of four practice management systems, JADA

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

29 of 52

Results

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

30 of 52

User adverse events


70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
ES PW DX SD

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

31 of 52

Record a missing tooth correct path

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

32 of 52

User paths

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

33 of 52

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

34 of 52

Usability of dental computer-based patient records


Significant usability problems due to:
complex information design mismatch between system and user model difficulty in finding functionality

Participants had to exert cognitive effort that did not contribute to task completion.

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

35 of 52

Research suggestions
elucidate common cognitive and decision making needs across clinical disciplines develop cross-discipline, modular user interface (UI) designs develop paradigms for information abstraction refine UI evaluation methodologies
Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

36 of 52

Sample project 1: Cognitive task analysis of dental examination


What cognitive processes do dentists engage in and what information do they use when they examine a patient and develop a treatment plan? Methods
think-aloud method with 3 standardized patient cases 5 dental faculty and 5 general dentists analyze the sessions to determine:
information that dentists requested sequence in which they reviewed information instances of concurrent review of information items

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

37 of 52

Results
Average of patient data accessed in 10 high complexity cases
35 Average number of times each patient data accessed 30

25

20

15

10

0 0% Start of 10% 20% 100% Average session time in percentage (normalized) for a case of high complexityEnd of session
Social History Medical Consult Radiographs Oral Pathology Consult Medical History Dental History Hard Tissue Chart Treatment Plan Notes

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Patient Demographics Medications Intra-oral Images Periodontal Exam

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

38 of 52

Results (cont.)
Average of patient data accessed in 10 low complexity cases
20 Average number of times each patient data accessed 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0% Start 10% 20% 100% End of Average session time in percentage (normalized) for a case of low complexity sessio
Medical History Radiographs Treatment Plan Notes Dental History Hard Tissue Chart Extra-oral Images Periodontal Exam

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Patient Demographics Intra-oral Images Financial Informaton

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

40 of 52

Visualization of information artifacts used over time

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

41 of 52

Sample project 2: Cross-platform, modular UI design


Microsoft Common User Interface (MSCUI www.mscui.net) sample problem: pt. identifiers

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

42 of 52

MSCUI: Designing for safety

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

43 of 52

Sample design: Patient banner

(includes 26-page Design Guidance document)

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

44 of 52

Decision support for distributed care

Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming T. Schleyer 2001

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

45 of 52

We know that decision support works


Garg et al., 2005:
improved practitioner performance: 64% of studies improved patient outcomes: 13% of studies

Jaspers et al., 2011:


improved practitioner performance: 57% of studies improved patient outcomes: 30% of studies Evidence
Garg A. et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes. JAMA Vol. 293, No. 10, p 1223-38 Jaspers M. et al. Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings. JAMIA 2011 18: 327-334

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

46 of 52

Research suggestions
elucidate optimal interprofessional work and decision flow develop appropriate inferencing mechanisms that:
are provider role and patient-specific; adapt to short, intermediate and long-term outcomes; and are built on evolving best practices.

implement DSSs within a distributed systems context (databases, communication, user interface)
Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine 47 of 52

Discussion: How do we meet these challenges?

By getting you involved!


Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine 48 of 52

The Dental Informatics Online Community


established in 2007 > 1,000 members from 30 countries self-declared interest in DI emphasizes access to discipline resources:
member directory tutorials and white papers publication archive project directory

www.dentalinformatics.org
Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine 49 of 52

http://ericwhitacre.com/the-virtual-choir
Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine 50 of 52

1. What was the major insight/new knowledge you gained from this talk? 2. What kind of concrete idea(s), if any, did this talk spark?
Please take a minute to write down your thoughts. Hand in your card.

Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

51 of 52

Thank You for Your Attention!


Questions, comments?
Thanks to:

P. Hernandez

Please visit us at: http://di.dental.pitt.edu Twitter Facebook /titusschleyer Scribd


H. Spallek T. Thyvalikakath H. Torres-Urquidy J. Irwin

A. Acharya

and many others.


CDI 2008 Center for Dental Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

M. Song

52 of 52 (Yeah!)

You might also like