buckling mode is regarded as favourable. In comparison to other deformation modes, progressive buckling has high energy absorption and stroke length per unit mass. For example, the specific energy absorbing capacity of a tube is 10 times greater undergoing progressive buckling compared to lateral compression. This attribute accounts for the frequent use of tubes designed to deform in this manner in energy absorbing systems. Gjb sjhcj cjhch skaaahg buckling mode is distinct as repetitive lobes/buckles are formed longitudinally if a sufficient axial compressive force is continuously applied. The key aspect is that the thin-walled member remains predominately along the vertical axis during deformation not invoking mixed mode deformation. Circular, rectangular and square cross sectioned tubes display variations of the progressive buckling mode with respect to lobe shapes and failure modes. Andrews et al.[18] classified the axial crushing of cylindrical tubes under quasi-static loading conditions into seven different categories based on their experimental observations. Wwcbcac c klsis dsc sr Their study did show that dynamic buckling transition is not a random phenomenon. It was demonstrated that the variation of each known parameter did influence the tube response in a predictable manner. The suggestion of a trigger (geometric imperfection or altering material properties strategically) could promote the initiation of progressive buckling. It was shown that at large impact energy the initiated progressive buckling later changes to global bending, producing a mixed buckling mode. aacnscabcjabcahjhgsjsjkss It was shown that the critical tube length has a tendency to increase with increase in impact velocity, although under certain conditions the counter-intuitive is observed and no distinct critical length could be defined. Jensen et al.[22] performed a numerical study of the dynamic buckling transition of aluminium alloy square tubes and noted that the critical tube length varied depending on the width-to-thickness ratio and impact velocity. Karagiozova and Alves [24] established the major parameters that govern the dynamic buckling transition of aluminium alloy circular tubes. The experimental study showed that the impact velocity, i.e. inertia effects, is a key influential factor. The material characteristics are shown to be a parameter as well, especially the material hardening characteristics. tysklwbyodtnomm The axial-load vs. displacement profile of progressive buckling mode has a general oscillatory trend. An initial high peak force is observed at the formation of the first lobe overcoming the yield strength of the material. The lobe is a plastic hinge where the walls of the tube fold around and extend at the hinges [19]. Thereafter a repetitive pattern is observed with the formation of consecutive lobes. The axial-load profile show regular oscillations about a mean force as shown Hjsckanxbcmtsc d Only local deformation occurs at the plastic hinge resulting in comparatively low energy absorption. An initial peak load is observed as a result of the formation of the plastic hinge and thereafter the load profile decays to a low, relatively constant force as the tube flexes around the plastic hinge. Thin-walled structures comprising of long and slender shells or tubes tend to buckle globally. A square tube that has failed in Euler buckling mode is shown in Figure 2.1. The specific square tube has a length-to-width ratio of 8 and a wall-thickness-to-width ratio of 0.006 [17]. These geometric ratios resulted in the preference of this mode of failure. cycjnkbxjavxav
Before starting with the description of the theory, is useful to
know the difference between the true stress-strain curve instead of the engineering curve and why is more meaningful for this kind of study. According to Deiter (1988), the engineering stress-strain curve doesn’t consider the changing of the specimens’ dimension in fact as presented in the equation (5) and (6), consider only the initial dimensions. Abdjsckabh bvxah Where K is the stress at the unit deformation and n is the so-called strain- hardening coefficient; these two coefficients vary for every alloy. To obtain the flow curve, some simplifications have been made like neglecting the Bauschinger effect and the initial elastic deformation. The Bauschinger effect describe the material hysteresis behavior but usually it’s admitted an equal yield stress for tension and compression; the other simplifications are to consider the material behavior like perfectly rigid without the elastic deformation below the yield stress and then during the plasticity the stress cannot be higher than the yield stress, this is called a perfectly rigid-plastic material. Hay…, bro / sis