Forensic Medicine and Power of Courts

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 25

Legal Procedures in

Court
By S. Solanki
Definitions

„ Forensic medicine* (Legal medicine or State medicine): It is the


application of principle and knowledge of medical sciences to legal
purposes and legal proceedings so as to aid in the administration of justice.
„ Medical jurisprudence (Latin juris: law, prudentia: knowledge or skill):
It is the application of knowledge of law in relation to practice of
medicine. It includes:
i. Doctor-patient relationship
ii. Doctor-doctor relationship
iii. Doctor-State relationship.
Criminal courts in India
Powers of Criminal Courts
1. The Apex Court
The Supreme Court is the highest judicial tribunal and
the highest court of appeal; located in New Delhi.
It has the power of supervision over all courts in
India (Article 134 of Constitution of India). The law
declared by it is binding on all courts.
Federal Court– Article 131 gives the power of original jurisdiction to the
Supreme Court, to resolve the dispute arising between the Centre and the States
or between two States.
Interpretation of the Constitution- Only the Apex Court has the power to
settle a question based on any issue related to the Constitution.
Power Of Judicial Review (Article 137)- All the laws enacted are subjected to
scrutiny by the Judiciary.
Court of Appeal – The apex court is the highest court for appeal in India. It has the
power to hear appeals from all the cases lying in the various High Courts and
subordinate courts of our country. A certificate of the grant is to be provided
according to Article 132(1), 133(1) and 134 of the Constitution with respect to any
judgment, decree or final order of all cases of the High Court involving the question
of law. Appeals to the Supreme Court can be made under the following categories:-
Constitutional Matters
Civil Matters
Criminal Matters
Special Leave Petition
2. The High Courts
High Court is usually located in the capital of every State and is the highest court in
the state. Judges in a High Court are appointed by the President of India in
consultation with the Chief Justice of India and the Governor of the State.12 It
deals with appeals from lower courts and writ petitions in terms of Article 226 of
the Constitution.13 It may try any offence and pass any sentence authorized by law
(Sec. 28 CrPC).
Original Jurisdiction – In some issues, the case can be directly filed in the High
Courts. This is known as the original jurisdiction of the High Court. E.g., In matters
related to fundamental rights, Marriage and Divorce cases.
Appellate Jurisdiction- The High Court is the Appellate Court for the cases
coming up from the trial court.
Sessions Court is usually located at the district headquarters and is also
known as District Session Court, and presided over by a ‘District and Sessions
Judge’. He is known as a District Judge when he presides over a civil case, and
a Sessions Judge when he presides over a criminal case. The district judge is
also called ‘Metropolitan Session Judge’ when he is presiding over a
‘Metropolitan area’.
Appointment of district Judge is done either by the state Government in
consultation with the High Court or by way of elevation of Judges from courts
subordinate to district courts.It can try cases which have been committed to it
by a Magistrate.
It can pass any sentence authorized by law including death sentence which is
subject to confirmation by the High Court (Sec. 28 CrPC).
Magistrates’ Courts are of three types:
i. Chief Judicial Magistrate
ii. First Class Judicial Magistrate
iii. Second Class Judicial Magistrate.

In metropolitan cities with more than 1 million population, the Chief


Judicial Magistrate and first class Judicial Magistrate are designated as
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate and Metropolitan Magistrate
respectively.
The High Court appoints the Judicial Magistrate of first class to the
Chief Judicial Magistrate (Sec. 12 CrPC).
Powers of Magistrate court is given in Sec. 29 CrPC. Higher court
can enhance the sentence awarded by it.
Basic knowledge about Legal procedure in court

Whenever an individual is accused for a breach of criminal law or aggrieved


from some other individuals under civil law for this the case brought for
decision before an officer which is called a judge. To arrived at decision some
processing are conducted in the light of Civil/criminal procedure code,
civil/criminal penal code and evidence act. These are collectivali call this legal
procedures the where this proceeding are done and judge sits is called the
court.
In short, it is a methods by which legal rights are enforced it called Legal
procedure.
Important legislation for Legal
procedure in Courts
Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860: It is a comprehensive
code that deals with substantive criminal law of India.
It defines various offences and prescribes code for
punishment in the court of law.1
„ Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) 1973: It deals
with procedures of investigation and the mechanism
for punishment of offences against the substantive
criminal law.
„ Indian Evidence Act (IEA) 1872: It relates to evidence
on which the court come to conclusion regarding
facts of the case. It is common to both the criminal
and civil procedure.
Subpoena/Summons
Definition: Subpoena (Latin, under
punishment) is a
document compelling the attendance of a
witness in a court of law, under penalty, on a
particular day, time and place for the purpose
of giving evidence.
„ Sec. 61–69 CrPC deals with summons.
Recording of Evidence
Testifying
A deposition is testimony of a witness. A deposition is
a discovery device—lawyers gather information on what
factual and expert witnesses says orally and assess the
relative effectiveness of their testimony. The purpose
of discovery is to identify all the facts related to the
case. The words spoken by the witness are treated as
courtroom testimony and the proceeding is conducted
in accordance with the applicable court rules. Sec. 118
IEA states about the person who may testify as witness
in a court of law.
Presentation of Evidence
After receiving subpoena, the witness must appear
before the court at the appointed time with the
relevant documents. The evidence is probed for areas
of uncertainty, inconsistency or any factors which
may make the evidence appear unreliable. Evidence is
presented in a systematic order (Sec. 138 IEA):
i. Oath (Sec. 51 IPC)
ii. Examination-in-chief (Sec. 137 IEA)
iii. Cross-examination (Sec. 141–146 IEA)
iv. Re-examination (Sec. 137–138 IEA)
v. Court questions (Sec. 165 IEA, Sec. 311 CrPC).
Oath
It is compulsory for the witness to take an oath in the
witness box before he gives his evidence. He is required
to swear by Almighty God that he will tell the truth, the
whole truth and nothing but the truth. If the witness
is an atheist, he makes a solemn affirmation in same
terms, instead of swearing by God.
Examination-in-Chief (Direct Examination)
„ It is the examination of a witness by the party who
calls him.
„ In criminal cases, the public prosecutor commences
this examination.
„ Objectives are to place before the court all the facts
that bear on the case, and if the witness is an expert,
his interpretation of these facts.
„ No leading questions are allowed except in those cases in
which the Judge is satisfied that a witness is hostile.
Cross-Examination
It is the examination of a witness by the adverse party (defense lawyer).
Objectives are:
i. To elicit facts favourable to his case.
ii. To test the accuracy of the statements made by the witness.
iii. To modify or explain what has been said.
iv. To develop new or old facts.
v. To discredit the witness.
vi. To remove any overemphasis which may have been given to any of fact in direct
examination.
„ The lawyer tries to weaken the evidence of the witness by showing that his details are
inaccurate, conflicting, contradictory and untrustworthy.
„ Leading questions are allowed (Sec. 143 IEA).
Re-Examination (Re-Direct Examination)
It is the examination of a witness subsequent to the
cross-examination by the party who called him.
Objectives are:
i. To clear any doubts that may have arisen during
cross-examination.
ii. To explain some matter in its proper perspective, so
that under-emphasis or possible misinterpretation
may be avoided.
Leading questions are not allowed. Opposing lawyer
has the right of re-cross-examination on any new point
which has been raised.
Court Questions/Questions by the Judge
A Judge may ask any question to the witness at any
stage of the trial to clear any doubtful points.42
The deposition of the witness is handed over to
him. The witness after carefully going through it, is
required to sign at the bottom of each page and on the
last page immediately below the last paragraph, and
to initial any corrections (Sec. 278 CrPC). The witness
should not leave the court without the permission of
the Judge.
Subpoena/Summons

Definition: Subpoena (Latin, under punishment) is a


document compelling the attendance of a witness in a
court of law, under penalty, on a particular day, time and
place for the purpose of giving evidence.

It may also require the witness to bring with him any


books, documents or other things under his control,
which he is bound by law to produce in evidence.
If a witness is summoned by two courts on the same
day, one criminal and other civil, he should attend
the criminal court (criminal courts have priority
over civil courts).
„ Higher court has priority over the lower. If
summoned to two courts on the same day, either
civil or criminal, he must first attend the higher court.
„ If a witness receives two summons on the same date
from the same type of court, he should attend the
court from which he received the summon first and
inform the other court.
Section 61- Summons shall be in writing, in duplicate, signed
by the presiding officer of Court issuing such summons and
shall bear the seal of the Court.
Section 62-Every summons shall be served by a police officer
or any other public servant. Summons shall be served
personally on the person summoned, by delivering or
tendering to him one of the duplicates of the summons. Officer
serving such summons shall sign a receipt on the back of the
other duplicate.
Section 63 – Service on summons on corporate bodies or
societies to be served on: i) Secretary ii) Local manager or
other principal officer or iii) Letter send to chief officer of the
corporation to be send by registered post.
Section 64– If person summoned cannot be found then one
duplicate of summon shall be served with some adult male
member of his family.
Section 65– If service of summons cannot be exercised as per
section 62 or 63 or 65, then summons to be affixed to some
conspicuous part of the house or homestead in which the
person summoned ordinarily resides.
Section 66– If person summoned is Government servant, then
Court issuing summons shall ordinarily send duplicate of
summons to the head of the office in which such person is
employed.
Section 67– When person to be summoned is outside local
limits of he court, then it shall ordinarily send such
summons in duplicate to a Magistrate within whose local
jurisdiction the person summoned resides.
Section 68– When Officer who has served a summons is
not present at the hearing of the case, then affidavit and
duplicate of summons endorsed as per section 62 or 64,
shall be admissible in evidence and statement made in
summons shall be deemed to be correct.
Section 69– When summon is to be served on a witness,
then summons may be served by registered post addressed
to witness at the place where he ordinarily resides or carries
on business or personally works for gain.
Fail to Attend

Summon must be obeyed, and if the witness fails to attend


the court, then:
i. In civil cases, he is liable to pay damages.
ii. In criminal cases, the court may issue notice under
Sec. 350 CrPC. After hearing the witness, if it finds that the
witness neglected to attend the court without justification,
may sentence him to imprisonment and/or fine, or the court
may issue bailable or non-bailable warrant to secure the
presence of witness (Sec. 172–174 IPC and Sec. 87 CrPC).

You might also like