Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Session 2 PDF
Session 2 PDF
Session 2 PDF
html
1. Market risk
Because of economic developments or other events that affect the entire market.
TYPES:
3. Concentration risk
Risk of loss because your money is concentrated in 1 investment or type of
investment.
When you diversify your investments, you spread the risk over different types of
investments, industries and geographic locations.
4. Credit risk
Risk that the government entity or company that issued the bond will run into financial
difficulties and
won’t be able to pay the interest or repay the principal at maturity.
Credit risk applies to debt investments such as bonds.
You can evaluate credit risk by looking at the credit rating of the bond.
For example, long-term Canadian government bonds have a credit rating of
AAA,
which indicates the lowest possible credit risk.
An Investor’s view of Risk
5. Reinvestment risk
Risk of loss from reinvesting principal or income at a lower
interest rate. Suppose you buy a bond paying 5%.
Reinvestment risk will affect you if interest rates drop and you
have to reinvest the regular interest payments at 4%.
Reinvestment risk will not apply if youintend to spend the
regular interest payments or the principal at maturity.
7. Horizon risk
Risk that your investment horizon may be shortened because of
an unforeseen event, for example, the loss of your job.
This may force you to sell investments that you were
expecting to hold for the long term. If you must sell at
time when the markets are down, you a may lose
money.
An Investor’s view of Risk
8. Longevity risk
Risk of outliving your savings. This risk is particularly
relevant for people who are retired, or are nearing
retirement.
• Diversified risk
• Return from one industry compensates for the loss if any that
may occur due to the holding of a security representing
another industry
• Often considered to represent the value that a portfolio manager adds to or subtracts from a fund's
return.
• Return on an investment that is not a result of general movement in the greater market.
Alpha of zero means?????
Portfolio or fund is tracking perfectly with the benchmark index and that the manager has not
added
ALPHA!!!!
or lost any additional value compared to the broad market.
CASE 1: Alpha
Suppose that Jim, a financial advisor, charges 1% of a portfolio’s value
for his services and that during a 12-month period Jim managed to
produce an alpha of 0.75 for the portfolio of one of his clients,
Frank.
While Jim has indeed helped the performance of Frank’s portfolio, the fee
that Jim charges is in excess of the alpha he has generated, so Frank’s
portfolio has experienced a net loss.
For investors, example highlights the
importance of considering fees in
conjunction with performance returns and
alpha.
• EMH:
• Market prices incorporate all available information at all times, and so securities
are always properly priced.
The iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) is a fixed income investment with low risk.
It tracks a customized index called the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Convertible Cash
Pay Bond
> $250MM Index.
Its year-to-date return as of November 15, 2019 is 18.24% which is higher than the S&P 500 at
14.67%, so it has an alpha of 3.57% in comparison to the S&P 500. But, again, the S&P 500
may not be the correct benchmark for this ETF, since dividend-paying growth stocks are a very
particular subset of the overall stock market, and may not even be inclusive of the 500 most
valuable stocks in America.
Statistics show that over the past ten years, 83% of active funds in the
U.S. fail to match their chosen benchmarks.
Experts attribute this trend to many causes, including:
Alpha Considerations
• Measure of volatility, or systematic risk, of an individual stock.
• Beta
Represents slope of the line through a regression of data points from an individual stock's
returns against those of the market.
• Beta is used in CAPM, which calculates the expected return of an asset using beta and expected
market returns.
• A beta of -1.0
• Stock is inversely correlated to the market benchmark as if it were an opposite, mirror image of the
benchmark’s trends.