Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Business - Research - Methods, Nov. 2022
Business - Research - Methods, Nov. 2022
Business - Research - Methods, Nov. 2022
METHODS
MISGANAW SOLOMON
NOVEMBER 2022
ST. MARY’S UNIVERSITY
Warm welcome
to BRM course!
EXPECTATIONS
?
List your three expectations.
PURPOSE OF THE COURSE
To acquaint you with the various research
methods used in social sciences in general
and business fields in particular
To explain business research methodology
To help you apply appropriate research
methods and techniques when you write
your Thesis
To enable you to write a readable,
comprehensible, well-organized original
Thesis at the end of your Master’s study
To contribute to your professional
competencies
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Demonstrate sound understanding about
research methods and research report
writing skills
Choose appropriate research designs and
methods for your projects
Use appropriate research methods in your
work
Analyze and report results
Critically evaluate the work of other
researchers
Apply the ethical considerations
MODE OF DELIVERY
Experiential
Lectures
Pair, group and whole class
discussions
Case studies
Reflections on reading and audio-
video materials
Critical evaluation of others’ research
works
Oral and written presentations
Hands-on
Technology
CONTENTS TO BE COVERED
Introduction to Business Research
Scientific Thinking
The Research Process
The Research Proposal
Research Methods
Measurement
Data Collection
Data Analysis and Presentation
Research Report Writing
ASSESSMENT
Why do we do research?
Deduction
Induction
Combination of
deduction and
induction
CONT’D …
Deductive – sometimes known as “top-down”
starts with a theory narrows that down into more
specific hypotheses
four stages (Streefkerk 2022) :
Example
“Low cost airlines always have delays.
If passengers fly with a low cost airline, then they will
always experience delays.
Collect flight data of low-cost airlines.
5 out of 100 flights of low-cost airlines are not
delayed. = reject hypothesis.” (Streefkerk 2022. p.1)
CONT’D …
Inductive - sometimes called “bottom up”
starts with specific observations, detects patterns & regularities,
formulates tentative hypotheses and arrives at general
conclusions/theories
used when:
• there is little to no existing literature on a topic
• no theory exists to test
three stages
established findings
conflicting evidence
gaps
SOURCES
Books (hard and/or soft copies)
Journals (Academic journals are most
useful of all)
Reports
Conference proceedings, working
papers
Theses and dissertations
Avoid using:
Textbooks, Wikipedia and sources whose
scholarly features are questionable
A GOOD RELATED
LITERATURE REVIEW
clearly delimits the subject matter to be
reviewed
covers all important relevant literature
is up-to-date
provides an insightful analysis of the ideas
and conclusions in the literature
identifies similarities and differences,
strengths and weaknesses, and
controversies in the literature
identifies gaps in the literature for future
research
CONT’D…
starts with a good outline and
consists of:
An introduction that establishes the
importance of the topic, the scope of the
review, and the organization of the
paper;
The major section headers and sub-
sections that follow the same
organization established in the
introduction;
Summary of findings, implications of
findings, and discussion.
WHY DO WE NEED TO DO REVIEW OF
RELATED LITERATURE?
define and clarify the problem;
summarize previous investigations;
identify relations, contradictions, gaps, and
inconsistencies in the literature;
properly situate a study within the bigger
scheme of things of what is being
investigated;
demonstrate the innovation and originality;
connects the literature to the study area and
topic
helps development of conceptual framework
HOW SHOULD YOU DO IT?
familiarize yourself with publications that deal with
the problem you work on
identify the texts you wish to include in your
review
decide on the most appropriate way to classify
materials you will use
identify the key issues
critically analyze what you have read
identify important issues that are still unresolved
write a draft of the review
read and think about what you have written and
then rewrite
AVOID PLAGIARISM
Quoting
Summarizing
Paraphrasing
Citing
QUOTING
Using others’ material as they are written
in the source document to:
• Affirm your statement
• Capture the precise language of an expert
who made the point particularly well
• discuss the source’s exact choice of words
to better understand complex subjects or
specialized language
• draw attention to an important point
Never leave a quotation without saying
something.
SUMMARIZING
Giving a condensed version of
somebody’s ideas
Discussing the most important points
Use you use your own words
PARAPHRASING
is changing a text so that it is expressed
in a different way from the source
without changing the original meaning.
Effective paraphrasing is vital in
academic writing to avoid the risk of
plagiarism.
How?
Change vocabulary
Change word order
Change structure of the sentence
CITING
Why do we cite others’ work?
credit others for their contributions
avoid plagiarism – of others as well
as self
How do we do it?
In the body (in-text) and in the
reference section (outside the text)
Three places in a sentence –
beginning, middle, at the end
CONT’D…
Different scenarios
Single author
Two or three authors
Four and more authors
Works with no identified author or
with an anonymous author
Works without date
Second hand references
REPORTING VERBS
TASK FOUR
Paraphrase the following sentence.
Acknowledge the source properly.
Author: Barbar Francis
Title of the book: Are you misusing other people’s work?
What plagiarism is and how to avoid it
Published: 2015
“If you want to avoid plagiarism, one of
the best things you can do is to learn how
to use research material - those ideas you
look up and refer to when you are writing
a paper” (p. 64).
CONT’D …
Summarize the following text in one
sentence. Acknowledge the source properly.
Author: Barbar Francis
Title of the book: Are you misusing other people’s work? What
plagiarism is and how to avoid it
Published: 2015
Some students feel they are actually meeting
the requirement of the assignment if their paper
consists of nothing but back-to-back quotes.
Inserting one quotation after another, even with
proper citation, brings no new ideas to the
subject. A paper filled mostly with quotes is
boring and unoriginal. (p. 67).
ASSIGNMENT (TO BE MARKED)
Write a three-page literature review
for the research topic you have
identified.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
is a logically structured representation (written or visual) of
the concepts, variables and relationships intending to
identify what will be explored, examined, measured or
described
defines the variables and relationships that should be
examined
is usually shown in a diagram/picture and connects
variables to the theories
illustrates what you expect to find through your research
is the researcher’s “map” in pursuing the investigation
is important to focus the data collection
is developed based on a literature review of existing
studies and theories about the topic
SUMMARY
Review of related literature:
is an essential part of the research process
gives an overview of theoretical background on a research topic
provides evidence of the existence of the problem
shows that there is lack of studies in the area being studied
justifies that it is important to fill the gap
discusses what the different theoretical and empirical literature
argues, and links it to the research under investigation
A researcher should:
focus on recent studies from high-prestige sources
focus on studies that are most relevant to the problem
use different sources – PubMed, libgen, pdfdrive.com, sci-hub
two types
conceptual literature concerning the concepts and theories,
and
empirical literature consisting of studies made earlier which are
similar to the one proposed
EXERCISE
Look at the outline you are given
and analyze the classification of the
review of related literature.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Methodology
A science and philosophy, general laws
and principles, and systematic procedures
used to guide the research and describe,
explain and predict phenomena
logical explanation behind the steps taken in
research
Intends to use the correct procedures/suitable
methods to find out solutions
classified into qualitative, quantitative, and
mixed-methods
CONT’D …
Methods
specific activities designed to generate
data
various procedures, schemes, statistical
approaches, etc used in research
explanations based on collected facts,
measurements and observations
help to collect samples, data and find a
solution to a problem
aim at finding solutions to research
problems
RESEARCH APPROACHES
Quantitative
generation of data in quantitative forms based on the
measurement of quantity or amount
sometimes known as structured approach
survey, experiment, observation, existing data,
context analysis
provides broad understanding of issues under
investigation
can be further sub-classified into inferential,
experimental and simulation
Inferential – helps to infer characteristics or
relationships
Experimental – some variables are manipulated to
observe their effect on other variables
Simulation – an artificial environment is created to
generate relevant information and data
CONT’D …
Qualitative
subjective assessment of attitudes, opinions and
behaviour
generates results in non-quantitative form involving
quality or kind
Sometimes known as unstructured approach
Interview, focus group discussion, case study,
literature review
RESEARCH DESIGN
the conceptual structure, blueprint for the collection,
measurement and analysis of data
what, where, when, how much, by what means
should enable to answer questions such as:
What is the study about?
Why is the study being carried out?
Where will the study be carried out?
What type of data is required?
Where can the required data be found?
What periods of time will the study include?
What will be the sample design?
What techniques of data collection will be used?
How will the data be analysed?
In what style will the report be prepared?
CONT’D …
Data collection
Type
Source
Organization
Presentation
Analysis
Interpretation
Reporting
PURPOSES OF RESEARCH METHODS
Why do we need research methods?
To secure data that are:
Valid – founded, logical, rigorous, and impartial
Accurate – free of errors
Reliable – other people who investigate in the
same way can produce similar results
Timely – current and collected within an
appropriate time frame
Complete – includes all data one needs to
support his/her decisions
To organize, present and analyze findings
To meet research objectives
TYPES OF RESEARCH DESIGN
Descriptive
Exploratory
Explanatory
Predictive
Causal
Correlational
DESCRIPTIVE
describes characteristics of objects,
people, groups, organizations, or
environments
“paints a picture” of a given situation
by addressing who, what, when, where,
and how questions
Eg. Ethiopian Central Statistics Agency
reports
does not provide direct evidence of
causality
CONT’D …
Descriptive vs. Analytical
Descriptive research
describes the state of affairs as it exists at present
does not explain why behaviour is the way it is
is very useful for setting out baselines or ‘templates’ of
how we think the world is
uses survey methods
Ex post facto research
reports what has happened or what is happening
Analytical research
uses facts or information and analyzes them to make
a critical evaluation
EXPLORATORY
is conducted to have a better
understanding of the existing problem
investigates a problem which is not
clearly defined
builds the foundation for descriptive
research
answers the questions what and how
does not provide conclusive results
Results of exploratory research usually
need further testing and evaluation before
they can be made actionable.
EXPLANATORY RESEARCH
Is deeper
Answers the question why
Intends to:
explain relations or events
advance knowledge about the structure,
process and nature of events
link factors and elements of issues into
general statements
build, test or revise a theory
Applies statistical methods to test causal
hypotheses
CAUSAL RESEARCH
establishes a cause-and-effect relationship
between two or more variables or sequence of
events
sometimes referred to as explanatory research
very powerful, conclusive research
Establishes/measures/examines:
Temporal sequence – deals with the time order of events
Concomitant variation – occurs when two events “covary” or
“correlate,” meaning they vary systematically.
Nonspurious association – means any covariation between a
cause and an effect is true, rather than due to some other
variable. A spurious association is one that is not true.
CONT’D …
Degrees of causality – Absolute,
Conditional, Contributory
Experiments
hold the greatest potential for
establishing cause-and-effect
relationships
An experimental variable represents the
proposed cause and is controlled by the
researcher by manipulating it.
PREDICTIVE
takes research one step further
empirical research concerned with
forecasting future events or behavior
based on patterns within a set of
variables
applies statistical methods and/or
data mining techniques, without
preconceived theoretical constructs,
to predict future outcomes
CONT’D …
Conceptual vs Empirical
Conceptual
related to some abstract idea(s) or theory
generally used by philosophers and thinkers
to develop new concepts or to reinterpret
existing ones
Empirical (also known as experimental)
based on experience or observation
data-based to make conclusions
helps proof whether certain variables affect
other variables
CONT’D …
Research design based on time and
environment
Time
One-time/Cross-sectional
to a single time-period
Longitudinal
over several time-periods
Environment
Field-setting vs laboratory or
simulation
Clinical or diagnostic research
HOW DO WE DETERMINE THE
RESEARCH METHODS?
Nature of the research
Research questions
Purpose and objectives of the
research
Data type
Data source
Nature, purpose and functions of
each method
SAMPLING DESIGN
Basic concepts
Population
the entire group of people, events, or things for
investigation and for which inferences will be made
Element
a single member of the population
Census
the entire population
Sample
a subgroup or subset of the population used to enable
to draw conclusions that are generalizable to the
population
Subject
a single member of the sample
CONT’D …
Parameters
Numerical summary of a population
The characteristics of the population
μ (the population mean), σ (the population standard
deviation), and σ 2 (the population variance)
the sample statistics – X (the sample mean), S (the
standard deviation), and S 2 (the variation in the sample)
Sampling
the act, process, or technique of selecting a suitable
sample for the purpose of determining parameters or
characteristics of the whole population
the process of selecting a sufficient number of the right
elements from the population, so that a study of the sample
and an understanding of its properties or characteristics
make it possible to generalize such characteristics to the
population elements
WHY IS SAMPLING IMPORTANT?
Discuss the need for sampling in a
study.
List down the major advantages of
sampling.
What possible disadvantages do
you anticipate?
REASONS FOR SAMPLING
Save
Time
Cost
Energy
Get richer data
THE SAMPLING PROCESS
Define the population
Determine the sample frame
Determine the sampling technique
Determine the appropriate sample size
Execute the sampling process
DEFINING THE TARGET POPULATION
the first step for sampling
must be defined in terms of
elements
geographical boundaries, and
time
DETERMINING THE SAMPLE FRAME
Sample frame
a list or a set of procedures that could
generate a list
a (physical) representation of all elements in
a population from which the sample is drawn
provides a listing of each element in the
population
Example – HR database, payroll of an
organization
Two types of errors
Coverage Error
people excluded from sample frame
Nonresponse Error
People who do not respond to survey
DETERMINING THE SAMPLING
TECHNIQUE
Two major types of sampling techniques
probability and non-probability
Each technique has different sampling
strategies.
selected based on the extent of
generalizability desired, the demands of time
and other resources, and the purpose of the
study
PROBABILITY VS. NON-PROBABILITY
SAMPLING
PROBABILITY SAMPLING
Each element in the population has
some known, non-zero chance or
probability of being selected as a
sample subject.
used when the representativeness of
the sample is of importance in the
interests of wider generalizability
applied based on unrestricted/simple
random, systematic, stratified, cluster,
or area sampling
Mainly used in quantitative approach
CONT’D …
Unrestricted or simple random sampling
every element in the population has the
same and equal chance of being selected as
a subject.
the probability of any one of them being
chosen is 1 in the number of the population
the least bias and the most generalizability
may be cumbersome and expensive
Because it is not possible to have an
entirely updated listing of the population, other
probability sampling designs are often chosen.
CONT’D …
Restricted or complex probability sampling
an alternative to the simple random sampling
design
a viable and sometimes more efficient alternative
to the unrestricted design
There are several complex probability sampling
(restricted probability) designs.
systematic sampling, stratified random
sampling, cluster sampling, area sampling,
and double sampling
Efficiency is improved when some of the complex
probability sampling procedures are used than the
simple random sampling design.
CONT’D …
Systematic sampling
involves drawing every nth element in the population
starting with a randomly chosen element between 1
and n.
The nth element or skip interval is determined to
find out he skip pattern applied to the sampling
frame.
To draw a systematic sample:
Identify, list, and number the elements in the
population
Identify the skip interval (n) n=
Identify the random start
Draw a sample by choosing every nth entry
CONT’D …
Cluster sampling
single- and multi-stage sampling
Single-stage Sampling
refers to grouping the population and
then selecting the groups or the clusters
rather than individual elements
The sample size must be larger than
the simple random sample.
is more heterogeneous within groups
and more homogenous among groups
CONT’D …
Cluster sampling
Multi-stage sampling
is a further development of the idea of cluster
sampling
is meant for big inquiries extending to a
considerably large geographical area like an entire
country
the first stage may be to select large primary
sampling units such as states, then districts, then
towns and finally certain families within towns
If the technique of random-sampling is applied at
all stages, the sampling procedure is described as
multi-stage random sampling
CONT’D …
Area sampling
is similar to cluster sampling
is considered when the total geographical area is big
first the total area is grouped into a number of smaller
non-overlapping areas, generally called geographical
clusters
then a number of these smaller areas are randomly
selected, and all units in these small areas are included in
the sample
is specially helpful in the absence of a list of the
population
makes field interviewing more efficient because it allows
the researcher to do many interviews at each location
CONT’D …
Stratified random sampling
is used when the population from which a sample is to be
drawn is not homogeneous
involves a process of stratification or segregation
The population is first divided into mutually exclusive groups
that are relevant, appropriate, and meaningful .
This keeps homogeneity within each group and
heterogeneity across groups.
Once the population is stratified in such meaningful ways:
either a simple random sampling or a systematic
sampling is used to draw a sample of members from
each stratum
The subjects drawn from each stratum can be either
proportionate or disproportionate to the number of elements in
the stratum.
CONT’D …
Double sampling
is important when further information is
needed from a subset of the group from
which some information has already been
collected for the same study
is used to collect some preliminary
information and later a subsample of this
primary sample is used to examine the
matter in greater detail
NON-PROBABILITY SAMPLING
Elements do not have a known or
predetermined chance of being selected as
subjects.
used when time or other factors, rather
than generalizability become critical
involves purposive or deliberate selection
of particular units of the population for
constituting a sample which represents the
population
used in both qualitative and quantitative
approaches
NON-PROBABILITY SAMPLING
is not possible to confidently make
generalizations
based on convenience, judgment and
quota sampling techniques.
CONT’D …
Convenience sampling
the collection of information from members
of the population who are conveniently
available
is most often used during the exploratory
phase of a research project and is perhaps
the best way of getting some basic
information quickly and efficiently.
CONT’D …
Purposive sampling
considers specific target groups instead of
readily or conveniently available subjects
confined to specific types of people who
can provide the desired information either
because they are:
the only ones who have it, or
conform to some criteria set by the
researcher
two major types of purposive sampling
judgment and quota sampling
CONT’D …
Judgment sampling
involves the choice of subjects who are
most advantageously placed or in the best
position to provide the information required
Quota sampling
used in stratified sampling to minimize the
cost of taking random samples from individual
strata
The actual selection of items for sample is
left to the researcher’s judgment.
CONT’D …
The size of the quota for each stratum is generally
proportionate to the size of that stratum in the
population.
is a necessity when a subset of the population is
underrepresented. For example, minority groups
can be considered a form of proportionate
stratified sampling
predetermined proportion of people is taken as
sample from different groups using
convenience sampling technique.
Can be:
controlled – Restrictions apply to choose
samples.
uncontrolled - Researcher is free to choose
sample.
CONT’D …
Snowball Sampling
identifying someone who meets the criteria
for inclusion in a study
Then this subject recommends others who
they may know who also meet the criteria.
is especially useful when to reach
populations that are inaccessible or hard to
find
CONFIDENCE LEVEL
is the probability that estimations are correct
shows the level of results’ accuracy and
error. In other words, tells how confident a
researcher can be in the results of his/her
study.
Although there are options of percentage
such as 90%, 95%, 99%, 95% is the
standard confidence level used in most
research.
There is tolerable level of error in all surveys
- usually 5% margin of error.
DETERMINING APPROPRIATE
SAMPLE SIZE
Determining sample size should consider:
The purpose of the study
The extent of precision desired (the
confidence interval)
The acceptable risk in predicting that level
of precision (confidence level)
The amount of variability in the population
The cost and time constraints
In some cases, the size of the population
itself.
TASK FIVE
Read the following cases carefully and identify which
sampling designs they refer to.
Case 1
Median
The value in the middle of the data
CONT’D …
Mode
The most frequent value, number, etc
CONT’D …
MEASURES OF DISPERSION
Range
extreme values in a set of observations
Variance
shows how dispersed the data are in a data set
is calculated as follows:
subtract the mean from each of the observations in the data
set
take the square of this difference
divide the total of these by the number of observations
Standard Deviation
another measure of dispersion for interval and ratio scaled data
the spread of a distribution or the variability in the data
the square root of the variance
SOURCES OF ERROR IN MEASUREMENT
Respondent
Reluctance, lack of good knowledge about the subject
matter , fatigue, boredom, anxiety, etc
Situation
Lack of anonymity, mood, etc
Measurer
Behavior, style, look, incorrect coding, faulty tabulation,
etc
Instrument
Defective instrument
complex words, ambiguous meanings, inadequate
space for responses, poor sampling, etc
CHARACTERISTICS OF GOOD
MEASUREMENT: VALIDITY, RELIABILITY
AND PRACTICALITY
Practicality
is more of operational
a characteristic of sound
measurement concerned with factors
such as:
economy
convenience, and
interpretability.
CONT’D …
Factors to consider while selecting and
constructing a measurement scale
Research objectives
Response types
Data properties
Number of dimensions
Balanced or unbalanced
Forced or unforced choices
Number of scale points
Rater errors
These factors influence the reliability, validity,
and practicality of the scale.
METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION
Types and sources of data – Primary and secondary
Primary
collected afresh and for the first time
original
obtained either through observation or through direct
communication with respondents
Questionnaire
Survey
Interview
FGD
Observation, photography, video, etc
Secondary
collected by someone else and which have already
been passed through the statistical process
DATA COLLECTION TOOLS OR
INSTRUMENTS
Questionnaire
a tool designed to collect and record information from many
people, groups or organizations in a consistent way.
a form composed of a number of questions
can be in hard or soft copy
can either be structured or unstructured questionnaire
Structured questionnaire
consist of definite, concrete and pre-determined questions
simple to administer and relatively inexpensive to
analyze
inappropriate to probe for attitudes and reasons for
certain actions or feelings
CONT’D …
Merits of questionnaire
low cost
free from the bias of the researcher
adequate time to give well thought out answers
applicable for large samples and thus results are more
dependable and reliable
can be either closed or open
Demerits of questionnaire
Low rate of return of the duly filled in questionnaires
only feasible for educated respondents
inbuilt inflexibility
slow
DESIGNING A QUESTIONNAIRE
Basic principles
make sure you understand your target
respondents.
The kind of language
Their preferred method of communication
Their basic demographics
Use an appropriate introduction that help boost
engagement and completion rates.
Greet your respondents.
Clearly articulate the purpose of the study.
Keep them assured that the information you
collect from them will remain secret.
CONT’D …
Keep the vocabulary simple and short.
avoid acronyms, abbreviations, jargon, technical
terms, and abstract or general words
Ask only one thing at a time/Avoid double-barreled
questions
Avoid hypothetical questions.
Would you … if … ?
Avoid double negatives.
Do you oppose not allowing …?
Beware of ‘leading’ questions.
Would you say that …?
How good is our HR/Financial system?
Provide options that are mutually exclusive.
CONT’D …
You may use different types of items using Likert scale
depending on the purpose of your study.
Agreement: Strongly agree, Agree, Neither agree nor
disagree, Disagree, Strongly disagree
Extent: To a large extent, To some extent, To a limited
extent, Not sure, Not at all
Quality: Very poor, Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent
Likelihood: Not at all likely, Somewhat likely, Extremely
likely
Experience: Very negative, Somewhat negative,
Neutral, Somewhat positive, Very positive
Pretest your questionnaire.
Observing the aforementioned principles help avoid
respondent confusion, misunderstanding, lack of
comprehension, or response bias
CONT’D …
Once you develop a questionnaire, it is good to review each item included in
the questionnaire. To this end, ask yourselves the following list of questions.
1.Will the item provide data in the format required by the research questions
or the hypotheses?
2.Is the item unbiased?
3.Will the item generate data at the level of measurement required for the
analysis?
4.Is there a strong likelihood that most respondents will answer the item
truthfully?
5.Do most respondents possess sufficient knowledge to answer the item?
6.Will most respondents be willing to answer the item, or is it too threatening
or too sensitive?
7.Does the item avoid ‘leading’ respondents to a specific answer?
8.Is the language used in the questionnaire clear and simple so that all
respondents are able to understand all of the questions?
TASK SIX
Identify the problems in the below questions and
rewrite them.
1.Organizational culture acts as the social glue that bonds
people together and makes them feel part of the organizational
understanding.
2.Leader’s power to influence employee behavior or the course
of events in the organization is professional.
3.If the Bank spends time and resources to manage customer
relationships, it can attract new customers and retain the
existing ones.
4.Company have minimum and maximum waiting time and take
action if it is late different department working together /linkage.
5.Company produce the product based on order sheet/customer
demand
INTERVIEW
one of the tools used to collect data
presentation of oral-verbal stimuli and reply in terms of oral-verbal
responses
can be personal or phone interview
can be structured or unstructured;
Structured interview
uses of a set of predetermined questions and is highly
standardized
Unstructured interview
is flexible
Semi-structured
Make sure the questions you put in your interview guide will allow
you to obtain adequate data.
Pose open, rather than closed questions.
Sequence interview questions from broad to narrow.
Avoid the inclusion of possible responses in questions.
Pose one question at a time.
Avoid posing multi-part questions.
CONT’D …
Merits
More and deep information can be obtained
Allows greater flexibility to restructure questions, specially in the case of
unstructured or semi-structured interviews
Allows to obtain personal information
Enables to control samples effectively
Keeps non-response very low.
Demerits
Is very expensive
Does not allow coverage of large samples
Is not suitable for intensive surveys where comprehensive answers are
required to various questions
Gives room for the bias of the interviewer
FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION (FGD)
a qualitative data collection tool where one or two researchers
and several participants meet as a group to discuss a given
research topic
involves a moderator and note-taker (facilitators)
eight to ten participants is recommendable – should not
exceed 12
enables to access a broad range of views on a specific topic
is good to obtain data on questions of why and how
General Points to Consider
Identify individual participants by some convention other than
their real names.
Ensure participants enjoy a location affording a maximum
degree of privacy.
Ensure handling of common personality traits and emotional
states.
OBSERVATION
Data are collected by investigator’s own direct
observation without asking from the respondent.
Is expensive
Requires serious thinking and planning
What should be observed?
How should the observations be
documented/recorded?
How can the accuracy of observation be ensured?
Structured observation
is appropriate in descriptive studies
requires the use of observation checklist
Unstructured observation
Is appropriate in an exploratory study
CONT’D …
Merits
enables to obtain data which serve as a check
against participants’ subjective reporting
allows researchers to develop a familiarity with the
cultural milieu
allows for insight into contexts, relationships,
behavior
can provide information previously unknown to
researchers
Demerits
time-consuming
difficult to document the data
an inherently subjective exercise
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Respect the participants and the sites for
research.
Do not put participants at risk, and respect
vulnerable populations.
Protect the privacy of the participants.
Clearly indicate the purpose of the data
collection.
Clearly inform your respondents that the data
will be used only for research and will be kept
confidential.
Obtain informed consent.
COLLECTION OF SECONDARY DATA
Secondary data
already collected and analyzed by someone else
may either be published or unpublished data
Sources of published data include:
reports and publications of the central, state, local, or
foreign governments, international bodies, associations,
individual scholars, universities, professionals, etc
technical and trade journals, books, magazines, etc
Sources of unpublished data include:
diaries, letters, unpublished biographies and
autobiographies
Require extra care
Before using secondary data, check:”
reliability, suitability, adequacy of the data
CONT’D …
Merits
Less expensive and time saving
More appropriate for longitudinal and comparative
studies
May result in unforeseen discoveries
Permanent and available
Demerits
May be collected for a purpose that does not match
one’s need
Unsuitability
Little or no chance for controlling data quality
Difficult to determine reliability of the data
DECIDING ON APPROPRIATE DATA
COLLECTION TOOL
Nature and scope of the study
Research questions and objectives
Issues of time, finance
Availability of and access to samples and
data
Preferences of potential respondents
Precision required
Your skills
Research design
USING MORE THAN ONE METHOD
Enables to a researcher to triangulate the
data
Helps to provide a general picture about
the subject matter
EXERCISE
Cleaning
any obvious data entry errors
Outliers (really high or low numbers)
Values entered for variables which do not
exist
Example: 0 entered where 1=male, 2=female
Missing values
CONT’D …
Organizing the data
Organize your data in one place based on
the nature and purpose of your study.
Remove incomplete data or those data
which do not make sense.
Classify the data into sections.
Use headings and sub-headings
appropriately.
Validate the data – whether the collected
data sample is as per the pre-set standards.
CONT’D …
Presentation
Textual - using words
Tabular
Frequency Distribution Table
Class Interval – numbers defining the class
Class Frequency (f) – number of observations falling
in the class
Class Boundaries – true class limits
Class Size – the difference between two consecutive
upper limits or two consecutive lower limits
Class Mark – midpoint or the middle value of a class
interval
Graphical
Graph (Bar/Multiple Bar Graph)
Chart (Pie/Line Chart)
TABLES, GRAPHS, BAR CHARTS
provide basic information about a set of data
display the distribution of a single categorical
variable
Indicate the number of times various sub-
categories of a certain phenomenon occur,
from which the percentage and the cumulative
percentage of their occurrence can be easily
calculated
QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS
begins with understanding the two main
approaches: deductive approach and inductive
approach
The Deductive Approach
involves analyzing qualitative data based on
a predetermined structure.
is quick and easy
can be used when a researcher has a fair
idea about the likely responses
The Inductive Approach
is not based on a predetermined structure.
is a more time-consuming and thorough
approach.
is often used when a researcher has very
little or no idea of
the research phenomenon.
CONT’D …
Steps
Arrange the Data
Transcribe the data collected; converting all the data into a text format
Either export the data into a spreadsheet or manually type in the data or choose
from any of the computer-assisted qualitative data analysis tools.
Organize all the Data
Go back to the research objectives and organize the data based on the questions
asked.
Avoid the temptations of working with unorganized data.
Set a Code to the Data Collected
categorize and assign properties and patterns to the collected data to compress a
tremendous amount of information collected.
begin to build on the patterns to gain in-depth insight into the data that will help
make informed decisions
Validate the Data
Accuracy of your research design or methods
Reliability
Concluding the Analysis Process
systematically present the data and the inferences of the findings
CONT’D …
Types of qualitative data analysis
Summarising (condensation) of meanings
produce a summary of the key points that
emerge from undertaking this activity
Categorising (grouping) of meanings
developing categories and, subsequently,
attaching these categories to meaningful
chunks of data.
Structuring (ordering of meanings using
narrative)
QUANTITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS
ranges from simple counts such as the
frequency of occurrences to more complex
data such as test scores.
ranges from creating simple tables or
diagrams that show the frequency of
occurrence to establishing statistical
relationships between variables to complex
statistical modeling.
can be done either manually or by
computer-assisted software (Excel, SPSS,
STATA, etc).
CONT’D …
is done using statistical tools:
Descriptive and Inferential statistics.
Descriptive analysis – statistically
describing, aggregating, and
presenting the constructs of interest
or associations between the
constructs
Measures of Frequency
Measures of Central Tendency
Measures of Dispersion or Variation
Measures of Position
CONT’D …
Inferential Analysis
is the statistical testing of hypotheses (theory
testing)
attempts to explain what effect the independent
variable has on the dependent variable
helps to evaluate the strength of relationships
between variables
Correlation
Cross-tabulation
Regression analysis
Frequency tables – ANOVA
Analysis of variance – ANOVA
Uses inferential statistics to reach conclusions
about associations between variables.
Helps to determine whether results from a sample
hold for a population.
CONT’D …
What does interpretation do?
Points to consider while writing interpretation
• Explain possible reasons for the results.
• Compare results with the results of previous
studies.
• Generalize from the results (be careful of
your words, remain tentative).
• Ask as many questions as possible to see
what your data mean.
• Let the facts speak for themselves; do not
force your data to prove your points or
hypothesis.
HYPOTHESIS TESTING
is a part of statistical analysis used to test assumptions made regarding
a population parameter.
is generally used to compare:
a single group with an external standard
two or more groups with each other
is intended to determine accurately if the null hypothesis can be
rejected.
does not prove that null hypothesis is true or false.
The following steps are recommended to test for statistical significance.
State the null hypothesis.
Choose the statistical test.
Select the desired level of significance.
Compute the calculated difference value.
Obtain the critical test value (the criterion that defines the region of
rejection from the region of acceptance of the null hypothesis).
Interpret the test (If the calculated value is larger than the critical
value, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the
alternative hypothesis is supported. If the critical value is larger, we
conclude we have failed to reject the null hypothesis).
TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Two types of Tests: parametric and nonparametric
Parametric tests
are more powerful because their data are derived from
interval and ratio measurements.
Assumptions for parametric tests include:
The observations must be independent.
The observations should be drawn from normally
distributed populations, which should have equal
variances.
The measurement scales should be at least interval so
that arithmetic operations can be used with them.
Nonparametric tests
are used to test hypotheses with nominal and ordinal data.
are used when normality of distributions cannot be assumed
as in nominal or ordinal data.
STATEMENTS FOR REJECTING THE
NULL HYPOTHESIS
“The Null Hypothesis was rejected.”
“A statistically significant finding (difference
, correlation) was obtained.”
“A reliable difference was observed.”
“P is less than a small decimal value (e.g.,
p<.05)”.
STATEMENTS FOR FAILING TO
REJECT THE NULL HYPOTHESIS
“The null hypothesis was retained.”
“The null hypothesis was tenable.”
“No significant difference was found.”
“No reliable differences were observed.”
HOW TO SELECT A TEST
In order to select a particular significance
test, a researcher should ask as many
questions as possible. These include:
Does the test involve one sample, two
samples, or k (more than two) samples?
If two samples or k samples are involved,
are the individual cases independent or
related?
Is the measurement scale nominal,
ordinal, interval, or ratio?
RECOMMENDED STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES BY
MEASUREMENT AND LEVEL OF TESTING SITUATION
Chapter One
Chapter Two
Chapter Three
Chapter Four
Chapter Five
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
Background
Statement of the problem
Objectives
Significance
Delimitation (Scope of the Study)
Limitations
Operational definitions (if any)
Organization of the paper
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
Provides background/context for a research
undertaking to hook readers
Describes relevant scholarship (previous
studies)
Indicates current status of the area under
investigation
Shows the gap
Is a tool through which you can convince your
reader that your research is unique and has
an added value
Concludes with a brief but formal statement of
the purpose of the research that summarizes
the material preceding it
CONT’D …
Check if the introduction addresses the
following questions:
What is the problem?
Why is it important to study this problem?
How does the study relate to previous work
in the area? If other aspects of this study
have been reported previously, how does
this report differ from, and build on the
earlier report?
What are the objectives of the study?
What are the theoretical and practical
implications of the study?
THESIS STATEMENT
Are constraints
List out problems you, as a
researcher, faced and the
impact these problems had
on the findings of the
research.
Are often beyond the control
of the researcher
ORGANIZATION OF THE STUDY
When?
As you use them. Record:
bibliographic details
brief summary of content
supplementary information
Put them in the body and in
the reference sections
PARAPHRASE THE FOLLOWING TEXTS
Summary
Begins by briefly describing the purpose
and methods of the study
Presents textual generalizations of
findings of the important data consisting of
text and numbers without deductions, nor
inference, nor interpretation
No need for elaborating or explaining
findings
Should be precise
No new data
CONCLUSION
Consists of statements of inferences,
deductions, abstractions, implications,
interpretations, general statements,
and/or generalizations based upon
the findings
Answer the specific questions raised at
the beginning of the investigation in the
order they are given under the
statement of the problem.
Should not be drawn from implied or
indirect effects of the findings.
RECOMMENDATION
Is a list of ideas/suggestions
for corrective actions
Action items and/or
Further studies
Should be
specifically related to the
findings
carefully worded
realistic
THE BACK-MATTER
References/Bibliography
Appendices
Signed declaration
REFERENCES
acknowledge the works of previous
scholars and provide a reliable way to
locate them
enable readers to retrieve and use the
sources
must be correct and complete
The word References should appear in
uppercase letters centered.
Remain consistent in referencing
sources.
Use alphabetical order to list the
resources.
CONT’D …
What should be included?
the name of the author (or authors);
editor (if there is one);
book title or article headline;
name of the publication;
publisher, place and year of publication;
volume, issue, and page numbers (in the case
of periodicals)
In the case of online sources, add the
following:
DOI or
The URL or Web address and the date on
which you accessed the source
CONT’D …
A book
A journal article
An article/a chapter in a book
Multiple authors
Works with no identified author or
with an anonymous author
Works without date
Revised editions
Second hand references
Theses and dissertations
Unpublished works
CONT’D …
Book
Author, A. A. (1967). Title of work. Location: Publisher.
Author, A. A. (1997). Title of work. Retrieved from
http://www,xxxxxxx
Author, A. A. (2006). Title of work. doi:xxxxx
Editor, A. A. (Ed.). (1986). Title of work. Location: Publisher.
Journals, magazines, newspapers, and newsletters
Author, A. A., Author, B. B., & Author, C. C. (year). Title of article.
Title of Periodical, xx, pp—pp. doi:xx.xxxxxxxxxx
A chapter in a book or entry in a reference book
Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (1995). Title of chapter or entry. In
A. Editor, B. Editor, & C. Editor (Eds.), Title of book (pp. xxx
—xxx). Location: Publisher.
Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (1993). Title of chapter or entry. In
A. Editor & B. Editor (Eds.), Title of book (pp. xxx—xxx).
Retrieved from …
Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (1995). Title of chapter or entry. In
A. Editor, B. Editor, & C. Editor (Eds.), Title of book (pp. xxx
—xxx). Location: Publisher. doi:xxxxxxxx
CONT’D …
Technical and research reports
Author, A. A. (1998). Title of work (Report No.
xxx). Location: Publisher.
A doctoral dissertation or master's thesis available
from a database service
Author, A. A. (2003). Title of doctoral dissertation
or master's thesis (Doctoral dissertation or
master's thesis). Retrieved from Name of
database. (Accession or Order No.)
For an unpublished dissertation or thesis
Author, A. A. (1978). Title of doctoral dissertation
or master's thesis (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation or master's thesis). Name of
Institution, Location.
APPENDICES
A place for:
complex tables
statistical tests
supporting documents
copies of forms, letters
data gathering tools, and
other evidence important for
later support
REVISING
Get the whole paper just right.
Reread, rethink, and reconstruct your ideas
on paper until they match those in mind.
Resee one’s approach, topic, argument,
evidence, organization, and conclusion.
Check if each paragraph and /or section:
describes a single idea;
is self-contained;
starts with a summary statement;
is supported by details that explain,
expand, and develop the initial summary
statement;
there are extraneous comments.
CONT’D …