This document provides guidance for publishing research articles without perishing. It outlines golden rules for choosing a journal before writing, such as printing off the journal's guidelines. It discusses factors to consider when choosing a journal, including audience, journal interests, impact factor, and turnaround time. The document reviews common article structures like IMRAD and provides tips for each section, emphasizing clarity, conciseness, and following the journal's guidelines. It stresses revising drafts and focusing on communicating findings simply and directly.
Original Description:
Original Title
Day 1- Lecture 1- Publishing Without Perishing RZ (1)
This document provides guidance for publishing research articles without perishing. It outlines golden rules for choosing a journal before writing, such as printing off the journal's guidelines. It discusses factors to consider when choosing a journal, including audience, journal interests, impact factor, and turnaround time. The document reviews common article structures like IMRAD and provides tips for each section, emphasizing clarity, conciseness, and following the journal's guidelines. It stresses revising drafts and focusing on communicating findings simply and directly.
This document provides guidance for publishing research articles without perishing. It outlines golden rules for choosing a journal before writing, such as printing off the journal's guidelines. It discusses factors to consider when choosing a journal, including audience, journal interests, impact factor, and turnaround time. The document reviews common article structures like IMRAD and provides tips for each section, emphasizing clarity, conciseness, and following the journal's guidelines. It stresses revising drafts and focusing on communicating findings simply and directly.
Tony Reid, MSF Brussels Golden Rules Choose your journal before you start writing Print off the journal's guidelines Follow them! Choosing a journal for publication Your audience Interests of the journal Listed on PubMed Impact factor Turn around time Open access vs closed journals Previous experience Ask a librarian or seasoned colleague Check the journal Types of articles Original research Short Report Case report Opinion piece/editorial Letter to the editor Guidelines to structure the article Note to the editor re appropriateness of the article Structure Introduction Method Results Discussion = IMRAD (Conclusion) Introduction Set the scene - What is the general problem? Specific question to be addressed What has been done before - the latest research Problems with previous research What is still unknown? Gaps? What’s new with my study? Conclude with aim / objectives – 1-2 sentences Methods Design Setting – general and specific Sample population – inclusion/exclusion Variables – exposure and outcome, validity Data sources Data collection Analysis strategy – statistics tools, sample size Ethics approval Results Just the facts, nothing but the facts Relevant results – relevant to the objectives Response rate Demographics Outcomes – numbers, %, P values, Confidence Intervals Avoid duplication in text and tables Tables/figures should stand alone Statistics – only report planned outcomes Discussion Summary of main findings of your study (avoid repeating numbers and link to objectives) What is new? Why important? Strengths and limitations of the study Compare to previous literature Speculation where needed Implications – programmatic and policy Future research Conclusion Keep it short and simple What did you show? Must be supported by your data Relate back to your objective(s) Practical Tips: Division of the paper E.G., length of paper = 2500 words Intro and methods = 1250 words Results = 500 words Discussion / conclusion = 750 words
Copy and paste objectives to Results and
follow the same order Introduction and Methods and Other things Take the Protocol and make it Paper_V1 Shorten Change the tense – go from future to past Develop versions as you progress IMRAD – acknowledgements – references – tables and figures Ancient Roman Proverb “Scripta manent, verba volant” “Spoken words fly away Written words remain”
“If you do not write about it,
it did not happen” Virginia Woolf Writing for clarity “Scientific writing” vs communicating Jargon - minimise Simple/familiar words Concrete vs abstract words Keep sentences simple – 15-20 words Keep paragraphs short – 5-6 sentences Avoid unnecessary/meaningless words - "It is the case that..." - "It is well recognised..." Writing Less is always more Avoid abstract nominalisations - "facilitation", "collaboration", "consultation" Be careful with emphasis words – “really”“most” Check tense – past vs present Word – Tools – Spelling/Grammar - Readability