Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tpic 3 - Formation of A Company (2) - 1
Tpic 3 - Formation of A Company (2) - 1
COMPANY
• According to section 20 of Act 179, it is unlawful to carry on
business without incorporation/registration if the number of people
involved is more than 20 (remember that we said the general rule
under partnerships is that the maximum number is 20)
• SALOMON V. SALOMON
• Mr. Salomon decided to change his enterprise to a company. The business was valued at 39,
000 pounds. Mr. Salomon then gave debentures worth 10, 000 pounds to the company making
him a creditor of the company. The membership of the company comprised Mr. Salomon, his
wife and his two sons
The Regulations
The Regulations
• To form a company, a person must deliver to the Registrar the
proposed Regulations (s. 14a).
• The Regulations:
• A company’s Regulations is its fundamental constitution or charter. It is
the document that sets out:
• the purpose/objects of the company;
• It defines the limitations of the powers of the company itself;
• It defines the duties, the rights, and the powers of organs ( BOD, members
in General Meeting; MD)
• Defines the interrelationship between the various organs and the company;
and
• It spells out how the company’s affairs may be changed from time to time.
• In sum, the Regulations define and regulate the manner in which a
company
The Regulations
• Unlike in other jurisdictions, notably England, where the Regulations
are contained in two documents namely the Articles of Association
and the Memorandum of Understanding, in Ghana the Regulations
are contained in one document only.
• Statement that if, on the winding up, there remains after the
discharge of all its debts and liabilities a property of the company
that property shall not be distributed among the members but
shall be transferred to some other company limited by guarantee
having objects similar to the object
Registration of Regulations
• DUPAUL WOOD TREATMENT v ASARE
[2005-06]SCGLR 667, 696-7
• Sophia Akuffo JSC
• “By virtue of section 14 of the Code, a company
comes into existence when its regulations are
delivered to the Registrar of Companies and he
enters the same into his register. It is the act of
registration that incorporates the company, such
incorporation being evidenced by the Registrar’s
certificate of incorporation”
Registration of the Regulations
• The Registrar is not bound to issue a certificate of registration
upon the mere submission of the Regulations. On the other
hand, the Registrar must not act arbitrarily.
• If the company is limited by shares, the return must state that the declaration required by sec 28(1) has been
delivered to the Registrar for registration.
• The return must be signed by 2 directors and the secretary of the company.
• The Registrar shall register the return and publish a copy of the return in the Gazette.
• AND
Registration of the Regulations
• Sec 28
• must show that its members have paid for its issued shares with minimum
value of
• twenty million cedis of which at least five million cedis shall be paid
in cash in respect of a public company
• five million cedis of which at least one million cedis shall be paid in
cash within the meaning of respect of a private company
• File a declaration in the prescribed form verifying that the payments have
been received
• Declaration must be signed by all directors and secretary.
Effect of the Regulations when
Registered
• When registered, the regulations have 3 main effects:
1. First, the Regulations constitute a contract under seal between the
company and its members, the company and its officers, the members
and officers of the company, the members of the company inter se, and
the officers of the company inter se. This is so for both public and private
companies.
2. Second, it vests power in any person stated by Regulation, whether or
not the person is a member of the company, to appoint, remove any
director or officer of the company. Note: the power of appointment
and/or removal is usually conferred on debenture holders or their
trustees
3. Third, the Act provides that any suit by a member or officer for breach of
the Regulations shall be brought in a representative capacity on behalf
of oneself and the members or officers who may be affected. This
provision is to prevent multiplicity of actions. The result of a
representative action binds all who were represented.
1. Adehyeman Gardens Ltd v. Assibey
Alteration of the Regulations
• A company may have a genuine reason to change its regulations from time to time.
However, care must be taken to prevent frivolous changes to the Regulations.
Promoters
Defn
• any person who is or has been engaged in or interested in the formation of a
company – sec 12(1). However, it excludes a person acting in a professional capacity
for the persons who are engaged in procuring the formation of the company.
• Compensate the company for any loss suffered by reason any of the promoter’s above
failings; and 12(2)©
• Account for profits for property or information in circumstances where such acquisition
should have been for the company and not for the promoter 12(3)
• Erlanger v. New Sombrero Phosphate Co.
• Facts
• A syndicate headed by Mr. Erlanger acquired a lease to work some
phosphate mines. It cost the syndicate 55, 000 pounds.
• Mr. Erlanger and the syndicate then formed New Sombrero Phosphate
Company. They named the first directors of the company. The lease was
then sold to the new company at a price of 110, 000 pounds. This purchase
price was purportedly ratified by the directors without inquiry.
• The phosphate shipments failed and the shareholders removed the
directors and replaced them with new ones. The new directors found that
the circumstances of the sale of the lease to the New Sombrero Phosphate
Company were not disclosed to the directors prior to the purported
ratification.
• The new BoD then brought proceedings to rescind the sale
• Holding
• That the promoters owed fiduciary duties to the company including the
duty to disclose all material facts relating to the contract to an
independent board of directors, which may then choose to agree with the
terms. Failing full disclosure of all material facts by the promoters, a
contract entered into between the promoters and the company was
voidable at the company’s option.
Pre-Incorporation Contracts
Pre-incorporation Contracts
• Definition
• This is a contract that is made between other persons before the incorporation of a firm. These
contracts are made in anticipation of incorporation.
• Before a firm is incorporated it has no separate legal personality. In fact, it has no existence at all.
And a non-entity cannot be a party to a contract.
• Kelner v. Baxter
• One Mr. Kelner offered in writing to the three promoters of a company yet to be formed to sell wine
to the named individual promoter on behalf of he proposed company. The offer stipulated the
quantity, price (900 pounds) and the date of payment for the wine. The promoters accepted the
offer. The wine was delivered and consumed. Later, before the company was actually incorporated,
the 3 directors held a meeting and purported to ratify the purchase. However, the company failed
before Mr. Kelner could be paid
• He successfully sued the promoters personally.
• Note: that the promoters purported to enter into a contract for the company yet to be formed and
the directors purported to ratify the contract for the company before the company was in fact
incorporated so at the time the contract was purportedly ratified (premature), there was in fact no
company. So who should be liable?
Pre-Incorporation Contracts &
Promoters
• Erlanger v. New Sombrero Phosphate
• The decision in this case shaped the law on pre-incorporation contracts and promoters:
• Where a contract is entered into between a promoter and the company, the company has the right
to rescind the contract – sec 12(4)
• The company can rescind the contract at anytime and there is no limitation period on proceedings
brought by the company – sec 12(5)
Reasoning
Due to their fiduciary relationships with companies, contracts between promoters and
companies are considered not to be at arms length, with the company being the vulnerable
party.
E.g. a promoter may sell his property or business interest to a company at above-market prices, or
enter into a contract to render services at above-market rates.
It is for these reasons that contracts between promoters and companies are viewed with
skepticism and the company given the option to rescind at any time.
• However, a court may relieve the promoter in whole or in part from liability in the court thinks
it fit and equitable to do so.
Pre-Incorporation Contracts
• Note: nothing forbids a company from entering into a contract with its
promoter; and a contract between a promoter and the company may be
ratified by the company.
• However, for the ratification to be valid, the following must be complied with:
• There is a full disclosure by the promoter of all material facts known to him; and
• The contract must be entered into or ratified by an INDEPENDENT board of
directors i.e. independent of the promoters; or
• The contract is entered into or ratified by all the members of the company;
• The contract is entered into or ratified by a general meeting at which neither the
promoter nor shareholder of any shares in which the promoter is beneficially
interested shall have voted on the resolution to enter or ratify that transaction.