Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TEMPLATE Basic Research SLIDE DECKS FBP
TEMPLATE Basic Research SLIDE DECKS FBP
PRACTICES OF MULTI-GRADE
TEACHERS:OFFSHOOT TO THEIR
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE AND
COMMITMENT RATING FORM
FELVI B. PAULO
Head Teacher 1
Mallig Central School- Annex
0965-5326-286 | felvi.paulo001@deped.gov.ph
I. Introduction and Rationale
This study will be conducted to assess the Level of Technical Assistance Extended by the School Administrators to
Teachers: Its Implication to Teachers' Instructional Competencies during the School Year 2020-2021 as perceived by the
respondents.
Specifically, it will seek to answer the following questions.
3. What are the practices of multi-grade teachers in Mallig District along the following areas:
a. Classroom Instructional Preparation and management
b. Teaching-Learning Resources
c. Learning Facilities
d. School Facilities
e. Curriculum Implementation
f. Managing Multi-Grade Classrooms
g. Multi-grade organizational/grouping approaches/strategies
h. Teaching Strategies
i. Instructional Grouping Strategies
j. Multi-grade Instruction
k. Major factors that in your observation significantly contribute to the
academic performance
5. Is there a significant difference between the teaching competence level of teachers and their best
practices in teaching multi-grade classes?
This research will be concerned with the evaluation and assessment of the practices of multi-grade teachers.
This study will aim to evaluate the level of competence of multi-grade teachers along different factors. The
respondents of this research will be the multi-grade teachers of Mallig District, Schools Division of Isabela, SY
2021-2022.
The study used the descriptive-correlational method of research and a multi-stage sampling was
employed as a sample scheme. The main instrument used in the generation of data was a survey questionnaire
purposively done by the researcher with the consultation of the adviser and critic reader. There were two sets of
questionnaires in the study. One was for the mentors. The other set of questionnaire was intended for the
mentees.
The respondents of this study shall be the 8 multi-grade teachers of Mallig District
The mode on how data collection will be made will be through the survey questionnaire to be filled
up by the respondents and the validation process through the institutionally-crafted monitoring tool,
aligned with technical assistance that the teachers know.
To pacify a smooth-sailing conduct of the study, all the variables and claims were meticulously studied
not to offend anyone that might affect personality of someone. Thus, this study anchors on the premises
that this is conducted to follow-up views and will be treated with utmost confidentiality and no one will
surely not be harmed.
In order to categorically answer the problems raised in the study, the following statistical tools will be employed:
1. Descriptive Statistics such as frequency counts, averaging, and percentages will be used to describe the present
profile of the respondents.
2. Mean. Mean or average will be employed to determine the overall picture of a set of data. The formula is
presented below:
X = ∑Xn
N
Percentage. Percentage will be used to determine the space occupied by each stratum or item in the frequency table
of the variables considered in the study. The formula is seen below:
P = __ _ X______ x 100
N
Where:
P = Computed percentage
X = Sub score value
N = Number of samples
Weighted Mean. This tool will be used to determine the weighted average responses
in a certain item. This presents and interprets the form and extent the involvement of the respondents. The formula is presented
below:
Where:
WX = ∑fw
N
1. To justify the computation for frequency and percentage, the formula will be:
P= F/N x 100%
Where:
P= Percentage
F= Number of frequency
N= Number of respondents
X² = (O-E)²
E
O = Observed Frequency
E = Expected Frequency
FELVI B. PAULO| Head Teacher 1| Mallig Central School-Annex | 09655326286 |felvi.paulo001@deped.gov.ph
D. Plan for Data Analysis
1. The F test will be used to compare the variances of two populations of data:
, where is the variance of the first group and is the variance of the second
group.
Prepare the letter of intent Submit narrative explanation with well-explained incorporated
Ask permission from the Schools Division Superintendent Letter of Proposal Letter of Intent, Narrative report with objective P200.00 October
objectives of this endeavor
Submit letter to the Schools District Supervisor attached with the signed
Prepare letters to be distributed to the respondents
Coordinate with the Schools District Supervisor letter by the SDS Present the duly signed permission to conduct the study Letter for the respondents P500.00 November
Request to administer Pre-Assessment of Technical Assistance Document the processes in administering the Pre-Test in Technical
Pre-Assessment of Technical assistance Administer Pre-Test on Technical assistance Letter request 3,000.00 December
Assistance
Finalization of questionnaire Editing of questionnaire Proofreading of questionnaires Reproduction of Questionnaire and 1,000.00 November
Tabulation of data and responses Employment of statistical tools and treatment Computation and analysis of the responses Tabulation of data and responses Retrieved questionnaires 5,000.00 January
Analysis of the results Table Presentation Threats Research results 5,000.00 February
Drafting of the Action Plan on SBM Formulation of heightened SBM Reproduction of Results per school and relay to the School Heads Summarize the results by school
TOTAL 2, 520.00
After the results will be identified, the impetus of integrating this breakthrough will be forwarded to the principal
and through channels to be adopted by the teachers as part of the formulation of program of studies to enhance
administrative and supervisory skills of school heads.
3. What is the level of Technical Assistance extended by the administrators to th3 teachers as to:
To answer this part, the respondents shall rate following indicators based on the level of technical assistance extended by school administrators.
Using the Likert scale, it is guided by the following descriptions:
5- Outstanding 4- Very Satisfactory 3-Satisfactory 2- Fair 1-Poor