Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    Facts For Debate

    Uploaded by

    Anuradha Chandrasiri
    The document discusses whether Facebook and YouTube are time wasters by listing their potential positive and negative effects. Positively, it notes they can educate and teach users, save money, provide entertainment, create jobs, and inspire learning. However, it also lists potential negatives such as spreading misinformation, increasing expenses, raising screen time, killing productivity, and not all content advocating for good. In conclusion, the document debates if social media platforms like Facebook and YouTube are overall time wasters or not.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Facts For Debate

    Uploaded by

    Anuradha Chandrasiri
    15 views4 pages
    The document discusses whether Facebook and YouTube are time wasters by listing their potential positive and negative effects. Positively, it notes they can educate and teach users, save money, provide entertainment, create jobs, and inspire learning. However, it also lists potential negatives such as spreading misinformation, increasing expenses, raising screen time, killing productivity, and not all content advocating for good. In conclusion, the document debates if social media platforms like Facebook and YouTube are overall time wasters or not.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Facts for Debate

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document discusses whether Facebook and YouTube are time wasters by listing their potential positive and negative effects. Positively, it notes they can educate and teach users, save money, provide entertainment, create jobs, and inspire learning. However, it also lists potential negatives such as spreading misinformation, increasing expenses, raising screen time, killing productivity, and not all content advocating for good. In conclusion, the document debates if social media platforms like Facebook and YouTube are overall time wasters or not.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    15 views4 pages

    Facts For Debate

    Uploaded by

    Anuradha Chandrasiri
    The document discusses whether Facebook and YouTube are time wasters by listing their potential positive and negative effects. Positively, it notes they can educate and teach users, save money, provide entertainment, create jobs, and inspire learning. However, it also lists potential negatives such as spreading misinformation, increasing expenses, raising screen time, killing productivity, and not all content advocating for good. In conclusion, the document debates if social media platforms like Facebook and YouTube are overall time wasters or not.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    Debate discussion

    Face book and You tube are


    time wasters

    Created by :
    M.H.G.Yasaru
    Face book and You tube are
    time wasters
    Positive effects Negative effects

     Face book and You  There are so many


    tube educate and teach Misinforms in You tube
    us. and Face book.

     When using Face book  Also this two social


    and You tube it’s Save medias Increase our
    our money. expenses .

     It is also provides It is Increases our


    entertainment. screen time.
     These two social  These two social
    media Create jobs. media kill productivity.

     Inspires learning and  Not all content is


    positive change. advocates for good.
    Thank You….

    You might also like