Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Instrumentation
Instrumentation
Data collection
Data collection is the process of gathering and
summarizing the data so that it can be transformed
into meaningful information in order to
– Identify and measure variables,
– Describe the behaviour of respondents
– Identify the relationships between the variables
Contd.
• Secondary sources
– These data are collected from either internal or
external secondary sources
– External sources: existing materials such as
published or unpublished records
• Published- journals, magazines, newspapers, government
reports, census reports
• Unpublished- official records, patients records, thesis,
dessertations and reports.
– Internal sources- biographies, personal diaries,
letters, memories etc.
Methods and Tools of Data Collection
Methods/techniques Tools
Biophysiologic measurements -Measuring devices
• in vivo biophysiologic
measurements eg. Vital signs
• In vitro biophysiologic
measurements eg. Blood tests
Definitions
A questionnaire is a structured instrument consisting of a
series of questions prepared by a researcher that a
research participant is asked to complete in order to
gather data related to knowledge, beliefs, feelings and
attitude.
Characteristics
• No predetermined set of responses
• Provide true, insightful and unexpected suggestions
• However, it is tedious for data analysis
3. Semi structured questionnarie
• This contains both structured as well as
unstructured opinion based questions in the
same questionnaire.
• An ideal questionnaire contains opinion based
question towards the end of all the questions
that would ask respondents about the
suggestions for changes or improvements.
Eg. 1. Do you perform exercise?
a. Yes
b. No
2. If yes, when do you perform exercise
c. In the morning
d. In the evening
e. Others (please specify…..)
3. How do you think exercise help in keeping us
healthy?..........
Or, what are advantages and disadvantages of doing exercises?
……………..
Types of structured questions
1. Dichotomous (yes/no); (Male/Female)
2. Multiple choice- Knowledge and practice related
questionnaires
eg.Which of the following disease is non-communicable?
a. HIV/AIDS
b. Tuberculosis
c. Hypertension
d. Hepatitis B
Contd.
• Translation
– Questionnaires may need to be translated if data is
to be collected in local language.
– Back translation into original language by
bilingual translator is essential to verify the
validity of questionnaire.
Contd.
Advantages of questionnaire
Merits
– Data from one respondents to other can be compared
– Easy for recoding, coding and analysing the data
– Prevents from diverting to irrelevant and time-
consuming conversation.
Demerits
– Cannot provide spontaneity of natural conversation
– Investigator’s bias may result as respondent’s views
are minimized
– More exploration of information of data is limited.
Contd.
2. Unstructured Interview (Non-directive)
– Also known as non-standardized interviews
– Here the questions are asked according to the
research problem in order to meet the respondent’s
intelligence, understanding and beliefs
– Interviewer encourages the respondents to talk freely
about given topic.
– No preplanned schedule is used
– The aim is to explore the information from the
respondents
Contd.
• Merits
– Less prone to interviewer bias
– Helps to explore the problem of respondents in detail
– When good rapport is built, useful for gathering
information on sensitive topics like eg. Domestic violence,
divorce, social discrimination, drug addiction etc.
• Demerits
– The data obtained from one interview is not comparable to
the data from the next
– Time may be wasted in unproductive conversation
– No order or sequence in interview, thus difficulty in
analysis
Contd.
3. Semistructured interview
– It is a flexible method that allows new questions to
be brought up during the interview, depending
upon the situation during the interview.
– Interviewer prepares the interview guide, which is
an informal list of topics and questions that can be
asked in different ways from different participants.
– It helps to focus on the topics at hand without
constraining them to a particular format.
Process of Interview
A. Preparation for Interview
• Fix up the appointment:
– Interviewer should fix up the topic and time of interview with
respondents ahead of time.
• Appearance and dress:
– The interviewer should dress in a fashion fairly familiar and with
due regards to the sensibilities of people who will be interviewed.
– Interviewer should be pleasant and should communicate a
genuine interest.
• Familiarity with interview schedule:
– The interview schedule must be studied carefully and the
interviewer must also be able to list items to respondents without
errors.
Contd.
B. Pre-interview introduction
– Researcher must introduce himself or herself to all
respondents respectfully
– Select the setting with as little disturbance as
practicable
– Clearly describe objective and significance of the
interview and study
– Give information on approximate time of
interview
– Ask them if they have any questions
Contd.
C. Developing rapport
– After primary introduction, develop rapport with
respondents
– This is developed through confidence building and
understanding the concerns of the respondents by
beginning the conversation on general topics.
D. Carrying the interview forward
– After establishing rapport, the interview is carried
out with following guidelines
– Start the interview
– Ask only one question at a time
– Repeat a question if necessary
– Try to make sure that the participants understand the
questions
– Listen carefully to the answers
– Observe the participant’s facial expressions, gestures
and tone of voice.
– Allow the respondents a sufficient time to answer
the questions
Contd.
Purpose of Observation
– To use as a primary source of information
– To validate/triangulate information collected by
interview or questionnaire
Types of Observation
1. Unstructured observation
– It involves spontaneous observation and
recording of the behavior (what is seen) with a
minimum of prior planning.
– It gives freedom to the observer, thus possesses
the risk of loss of objectivity and problem of
remembering all details of the observed events.
– It is generally used in qualitative studies
• The potential for bias is high
• Unstructured observation is carried out by using
unstructured tools, and the following tools are
generally used by the researchers.
– Log and field notes
– Anecdotes
– Field diary
– Video recording
Contd.
2. Structured observation
– In this method, researcher prepares a structured or
semi-structured tool in advance to observe the
phenomenon under study.
– It is guided by the preplanned structured or semi-
structured instrument, where the researcher observes
only specific attributes or behaviour in accordance
with planned observation guidelines.
– This helps the researchers to be on the track while
carrying out an observation as well as analysis of
data collected remains easy
Contd.
6. Direct Observation
• In this type, participants are aware that they are being
observed.
• Hawthrone effect may occur- people behave differently
when being observed.
Structured ObservationTools
• Observation checklist
• Rating scale
• Observational checklist
– It is one of the most commonly used instruments for
performance evaluation
– It enables the observer to note only whether or not a
trait is present.
– It consists of a listing of steps, activities, and
behaviours the observer records when an incident
occurs.
– The observer has to judge whether certain behaviour
has taken place.
Definition
– A checklist is a simple instrument consisting of
prepared list of expected items of performance or
attributes, which are checked by a researcher for
their presence or absence.
• Eg. of checklist
Checklist for evaluation of student’s performance during surgical dressing
Construction of Checklist
– Express each item in a clear, simple language
– The list of items in the checklist may be continuous or
divided into groups of related items (eg. Blood transfusion
process- Pre transfusion, during transfusion, post
transfusion)
– The lists of items should be formulated on the basis of
judgement of experts in a stepwise procedure
– Avoid negative statements wherever possible
– (eg. Did not wash hands- incorrect
Performs hand washing- correct)
– Review the items independently.
– It must have quality of completeness and
comprehensiveness
`
• Merits of checklist
– Allows the inter-individual comparisons
– Simple method to record observation
– best for clinical procedure evaluation
– Provides objectivity, no space for subjective bias
– Decreases chances for error in observation
• Demerits of checklist
– Does not indicate quality of performance
– Only a limited component of overall clinical
performance can be evaluated
ie. only the presence of absence or presence of an
attribute, behaviour or performance is assessed,
degree of accuracy cannot be assessed.
Rating Scale
– Rating is the term used to express the opinion or
judgement regarding some performance of a person,
object, situation or character
– It has qualitative description of some aspects of traits of a
person or a thing
– It allows the observer to rate behaviour or event on a
scale
– It provides more descriptive information for analysis than
by a checklist.
– However, it tends to be more subjective and observer’s
bias may be introduced
Contd.
Definition
– Rating scale refers to a scale with a set of opinion,
which describes varying degree of the dimensions
of an attitude being observed.
– Rating scale is a tool in which the one person
simply checks off another person’s level of
performance.
– It could be three-point, five-point, or seven point
rating scale
Contd.
Least I I I I I I I Most
Contd.
Advantages of Observation
– Collects data so as to when and where an activity
or event is happening so recall bias is eliminated
– Respondents are readily available
– Instrument is simple to use
– Gives first hand information about the situation
– Directly allows to notice what people do rather
than checking what people tell that they did.
Contd.
Limitations of Observation
– The time and duration of an event may not be
predictable
– The observer must wait until the event occurs
– Observation of human behaviour is time
consuming; thus not feasible in large scale studies.
– It is an intense process with a recommended
maximum length of time for observation for one
observer is 30 mins. For a longer period, team of
observers may be needed.
Contd.
– Chemical measures
– Microbiologic measures
– Histologic measures
Advantages of biophysiologic methods
– Accurate, precise and sensitive
– More objective in nature
– Valid and reliable measures for targeted variables,
ie. these measurement tools only measure what
they are supposed to measure
– Easy access to most of the instruments in clinical
settings which are used for routine patient care
Disadvantages of biophysiologic methods
– Some instruments are very expensive
– Use of instruments requires significant training,
knowledge and experience
– May cause fear and anxiety among participants
thus distorting the results
– Some measures may have harmful effect on
patients. eg. X-rays
Anthropometry
– It is the process that involves the quantitative
measurement of the human body
– It is a portable, universally applicable, inexpensive
and non-invasive technique for assessing the size,
proportions and composition of the human body
– As a data collection process it is used to evaluate
both under-nutrition and over nutrition
– However, the measured values reflect the current
nutritional status and does not differentiate between
acute and chronic changes.
Anthropometric parameters