Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter Two Project Identification
Chapter Two Project Identification
Chapter Two Project Identification
Project Identification
and Selection
2
Reflection
What are the sources for project ideas?
How can potential projects be identified?
Is problem identification the same as
project identification?
Who identify projects?
3
Project Identification
Project identification is the initial phase of the
project cycle.
- It begins with the conceiving of ideas or
intentions to set up a project.
- national development plans and strategies are
also translated into specific investment projects
4
Sources of project ideas:
The community,
researchers,
experts,
local leaders,
Policy makers,
entrepreneurs,
donors,
NGOs,
Government policy priorities,
unusual events,
external threats,
unsatisfied demands,
5
Project Identifications
Who identifies projects?
◦ Various organizations, whether local or foreign,
state owned or private, government ministries,
development banks, interest groups, NGOs and
individual experts can identify projects.
two major approaches to project identification
◦ Top-down approach
◦ Bottom-up approach
6
Top-Down Approach
Projects are identified based on demands from national or
International stakeholders or International conventions.
For example:
◦ international conventions (such as Kyoto Protocol for climate
change)
◦ international institutions that have determined particular
priorities
◦ national policy makers identifying projects that pertain to
party manifestos and/or national plans.
Advantages of Top-Down Approach
◦ Serves as a rapid response to disasters like floods, war
outbreak, etc. Due to limited time and chance to consult the
beneficiaries.
◦ It can be effective in providing important services like
education, health, water, roads etc.
◦ It can contribute to wider national or international objectives
and goals
7
Limitations of Top-Down Approach
Does not help in modifying strongly established
ideas and beliefs of people.
Assumes external individuals know better than the
beneficiaries of the service.
Communities have little say in planning process
Does not help in local human resource development.
Community develops dependency syndrome on
outside assistance and does not exploit their own
potential.
The development workers (change agents) become
stumbling blocks to people-led development
8
Bottom-Up Approach
community/ beneficiaries are encouraged to
identify and plan the projects themselves with or
without outsiders.
Advantages of Bottom-Up Approach
Interveners accomplish more with limited
resources since people tend to safeguard what
they have provided for themselves.
Develops people’s capacity to identify problems
and needs and to seek possible solutions to them.
Provides opportunities of educating people.
Helps people to work as a team and develop a
“WE” attitude - makes project progressive and
sustainable.
Resources are effectively managed; dependence
reduces, there is increased equity, initiative,
accountability, financial and economic discipline.
9
Limitations of Bottom-Up Approach
Not always effective for projects that
require urgency to implement
Time-consuming and requires patience and
tolerance.
People sometimes dislike this approach
because they do not want to take
responsibility for action.
The agency using this approach is never in
control and cannot guarantee the results it
would want.
The priorities of communities may not fit
with national or international priorities that
seek to have a broader impact.
10
Project Identification in Both
approaches
Involves needs assessment
- collecting, processing and analyzing data on
problems/needs of communities
Review of secondary data
- Look at books, survey reports/ research papers,
publications, media reports, internet etc.
Collecting and analyzing primary information
• Interviews
• Community mapping
• Focus Group Discussions
• Other methods
11
Questions to be addressed in
a project:-
What is the major objective of the project within specified
time?
What is the basis for the demand or need for the
goods/services to be produced by the project?
What problem or opportunity is the project addressing?
How does the project contribute to the wider goals of the
sector/organization/ region?
What alternative ways of addressing the
problem/opportunity/ have been considered?
Why is the proposed project the most appropriate way of
addressing the problem/opportunity?
What is the approximate cost and time schedules of the
project?
12
Questions cont’d…
Who are the major stakeholders and
beneficiaries of a project?
Which institution is the most appropriate
for implementation?
Are there additional or special
13
Methods in Project identification
and selection:
Stakeholders analysis
SWOT analysis
Problem analysis
Objective analysis
Alternative Tree Analysis
14
a) Stakeholder analysis?
15
Purpose of stakeholders analysis: -
16
Stakeholder Analysis promotes the three necessary
conditions for the effective implementation of a
project:-
• Awareness/ Commitment: Obtaining
stakeholders under standing and belief in the
objectives and implementation strategy of the
project.
• Capability: that stakeholders believe they can
cope with and benefit from the changes which
the project is intended to bring
• Inclusion: that stakeholders feel they are valued,
consulted and part of the change process which
the project represents
17
b) SWOT Analysis
SWOT analysis is a tool for institutional appraisal and a
brainstorming exercise in which the representatives of the
organization participate fully.
Purpose:
◦ To assess the performance and capacity of the participating units,
divisions of organization.
◦ Each participating unit has to undertake SWOT analysis.
SWOT stands for:
◦ Strengths - the positive internal attributes of the organisation
◦ Weaknesses - the negative internal attributes of the organisation
◦ Opportunities - external factors which could improve the
organisation’s prospects
◦ Threats - external factors which could undermine the
organisation’s prospects
18
c) Problem Analysis
Begins with identifying a core problem. A problem-
is an obstacle, impediment, difficulty or challenge,
gap or any situation that needs solution.
Problems Analysis visually shows the causes and
19
Steps in Undertaking Problem Tree
Identify a “core” or central problem
List all the problems related to or stemming
20
Problem Tree
EFFECT
CAUSE
21
Problem tree Analysis
Relies on:
◦ Group-based inter-action eg. Workshop format
◦ Participation of key stakeholders
◦ Process facilitation
◦ Achieving consensus on problems, causes and
effects
22
Example 1: Subject of the workshop is food security,
the possible problems mentioned in relation to this
are:
Food production on hills Dikes are degraded
decreasing Soil fertility on hill
Ethnic clashes in slopes is decreasing
neighboring districts Soil erosion on hill
Food shortages slopes
High incidence of Irregular supply of
malnutrition inputs for rice
Canals are blocked production
Rice production in low High immigration rates
lands decreasing Irrigation water does
Poor maintenance of not reach fields in
irrigation facilities desired quantity
23
High incidence
Food shortages
Rice production in
Lowlands decreasing Food Production High immigration
on hills decreasing Rates
Effect
Cause
25
Incidence of
Malnutrition reduced
Diagram of objectives
Improved Food
situation
Means
Maintenance
irrigation facilities
improved
26
e) Alternative Tree Analysis
is a process in which specific project strategies are
identified and selected from among the objectives and
means raised in Objectives Analysis, based upon
selection criteria.
The aim of alternative strategy analysis is division of
the objectives tree into more consistent smaller sub-
units
Each of the sub-units of the objective tree can
represent an alternative strategy for the future project.
The project objectives set the framework for the
strategy of the project.
27
Criteria for selecting the alternative:
RELEVANCE: the strategy corresponds to the
needs of the stakeholders.
EFFECTIVENESS: the lower level objectives of
28
Incidence of
Malnutrition reduced
Diagram of Alternatives
Improved Food
situation
Soil fertility on
Sufficient irrigation Regular supply of hill slopes
water reaches the inputs for rice increased
fields production
Less ethnic
clashes in
neighboring
districts
Canals Dikes are
cleared upgraded Soil erosion on hill
slopes reduced
Maintenance
irrigation facilities
improved
29
Alternatives for decision:
Let us assume that agricultural
inputs are provided by one NGO, soil
conservation activities are already in
place by agriculture office, and
conflict is on the process to be
resolved by government officials in
the area. Therefore, the project will
focus on the irrigation system
alternative
30
Group Exercise 1
Core problems:
Ineffectiveness of Trainings in the civil services
Problem of Primary Education in Nomadic area
Problem of Potable Water in X Kebele
Problem of car Accident in Addis Ababa
Problem of transportation in Addis Ababa
Rampant corruption in the country
Instruction:
◦ Prepare problem and objective trees
◦ Select one or two alternative solution
31
Economic Analysis
Is an assessment of a project’s costs and benefits
from the view point of the national economy or the
society.
Rationale for Economic Analysis is that Net private
benefits and net social benefits are different due to
the existence of:
◦ market imperfections,
◦ externalities
◦ income redistribution,
◦ Taxes and subsidies
◦ Etc.
In such circumstances, social cost analysis must
depend on shadow prices (instead of market prices)
to measure the net benefit to the society.
32
Economic Analysis
Shadow prices is the price used for analysing the cost and
benefit of a project when the market price is felt to be a
poor estimate of the economic value of a project.
Shadow price measures the value of commodity from
point of view of the society or the economy of a nation.
After estimating the shadow prices, we measure the
viability of the project through the normal process of
calculating NPV, IRR or CBR.
33
Financial Vs Economic analysis
Financial Economic
Appraise the project from the
Appraise the project from the
view point of an entrepreneurs, view point of macro or national
investor or financier. economy or its contribution to
the society.
Covers only private costs and It takes into account social costs
benefits
and benefits.
Taxes are treated as costs and Taxes and subsidies are treated
subsidies as a return. as transfer payments.
Interest paid to external Interest on capital is never
suppliers of money may be separated and deducted from
deducted to obtain the stream gross return because it is part of
of benefit available to the the total return to the capital
owner of the project. available to the society as a
The overriding objective is whole.
financial viability (i.e. making The objective is economic
profit) based on market price. viability [social benefits] based
on shadow price.
34
Therefore, market prices are often distorted
by:
Taxes
Monopolistic/Oligopolistic measures
Subsidies
Rent, Interest
Quotas
Regulatory measures
Protection, etc
And must be adjusted to reflect social value
35
In economic analysis we consider the benefits
of the project to the society such as:
Employment creation
Foreign Exchange generation or saving
Contribution to different sectors: such as
health, education, etc.
Multiplier effect (on other economic
variables in the economy)
Linkages (both forward and backward
linkages)
Economies and diseconomies of scale
Externalities, etc.
36
Conversion factor
We use conversion factor to change the
market price to shadow price.
Conversion Factor: is a number, usually less