Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Based Learning
Case Based Learning
A 40-year-old male from Pakshikere, Mangalore Urban, presented to the surgery OPD at Government Wenlock
Hospital with symptoms of fever, scrotal pain with swelling (mild), gross swelling of his left lower limb for one
year.
What other relevant history will you elicit to support or refute the diagnosis?
The surgery postgraduate taking elaborate history elicited that the patient did not have any previous surgeries
There were no aggravating or relieving factors for the swelling of the lower limb.
There was no increase in swelling on standing for a prolonged period, neither the swelling decrease on taking
There is no history of acute episodes of pain or erythema of the lower limb. (Acute deep venous thrombosis).
The patient does not complain of any lethargy, nor gives a history of treatment for thyroid problems.
(Myxedema).
The patient does not give any history of trauma to the left lower limb.
The patient is a farmer by occupation. He resides next to the agriculture fields and belongs to low-socio-
economic status.
The left lower limb swelling has been present for more than a year and has been gradually increasing in size.
What is the importance of asking place of residence in medical history?
Examination
The overlying tissue of the left lower extremity was indurated, possibly due to secondary infection and tissue
trauma, and
Dermatologic changes were seen on the lower limb consistent with elephantiasis
Asymmetrical non-pitting oedema had been present and had increased in severity over time.
Keratosis spots were present over the entire body,
USG revealed anechoic tubular channels in the Para testicular region which showed no flow on Color Doppler study.
Ultrasound examination showed anechoic tubular channels in the inguinal region and anterior to femoral vessels
which failed to show any flow on color flow imaging.
Laboratory Workup
Night blood smear examination with Giemsa stain confirmed Bancroftian filariasis with 313 W. bancrofti mf/ml
His wife tested LF positive based on both ICT and night blood smear examination.
Both husband and wife reported taking only one round of MDA during their lifetime.
The patient’s son, daughter-in-law and both the grandchildren tested negative.
None of the immediate family members had anatomical abnormalities related to LF.
However, a family history suggested that the patient’s elder brother likely also had an advanced filarial
infection, as he had progressive lymphedema of the lower right extremity that developed over the last five
No MDA has been carried out in the area for the past 3 years.
What is Mass Drug Administration?
The initial treatment prescribed for the active filarial infection was a 6 mg dose of Ivermectin and a 400 mg
dose of albendazole every three months with follow-up.
The patient has been prescribed a daily dose of 200 mg of doxycycline, which has been shown to cause a
significant reduction in lymphedema in patients with Grade II–III LF following 12–24months of treatment,
regardless of circulating filarial status.
Two months after the initial diagnosis, following prescribed treatment with ivermectin and albendazole, a
night blood smear test showed no evidence of circulating microfilaria.
A complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, and urinalysis were all found to be within normal
limits.
A routine clinical survey for filariasis was carried out in a community health centre, serving 1 lakh population; data
collected is as follows:
Calculate the possible filarial indices. And suggest the control measures.
a) Asymptomatic a microfilaraemia
= 30000-(people with signs and people with blood test +ve and both)/30000X100
= 30000-(80+300+10)/30000X100
= 29610/30000X100
= 98.7%
b) Asymptomatic Microfilaraemia
= Consider only asymptomatic ppln
= Exclude symptomatic from Nr and Dr
= People with positive blood test/asymptomatic populationX100
= 300/(30000-80-10)X100
= 300/29910X100
= 1.0%
= Carriers – important source of infection to the community
c) Microfilarial rate
= 310/30000X100
= 1.03%
= 90/30000X100
= 0.3%
a). 40,000 people were clinically examined and night blood examination was done.
b). 300 people had only microfilaria of W. Bancrofti in their peripheral blood.
Total no: of people having microfilaria in blood + disease manifestation x 100
Total no: of people examined
= 300 + 3400 x 100 %
40,000
= 3700 x 100 = 9.25 %
40,000
The man hour catch of 70 indicates medium vector density of the adult mosquito. Hence, antilarval and antiadult,
1 ) All 3700 persons having microfilaria should be treated for 12 days with Diethylcarbamazine (DEC) i.e. 6
mg/kg body weight. In endemic areas, the Rx must be repeated every 2 years.
2 ).CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS :
The basic principle in the revised filariasis control strategy is a large scale treatment with albendazole (400 mg)
with DEC(6mg/kg) or ivermectin (150-200 mcg/kg) administration to the population of the entire district.
a) Hygiene
c) Elevation,
d) Exercise
e) Footwear
f) Cosmetic surgery
g) hydrocelectomy
4) IEC to inculcate individual/ community based protective and preventive habits are an
a)Wash leg with soap & clean water, b)Dry leg carefully and gently, c)Elevate leg during day and night, d) Exercise
Health education to the public – motivate people to operate anti-filarial activities and to take complete treatment
5. VECTOR CONTROL
Integrated vector control
a) Anti larval measures:
Minor Engineering works like canalization, desilting, filling, adequate maintenance of Septic tank, etc. sufficient
gradient should be provided for drainage system.
Removal of pistia plant, removal of scum and vegetations
Chemical control: Mosquito larvicidal oil or pyroselene oil-E or organophosphorous larvicides like fenthion, temephos
are found to give succesful results.
b) Anti adult measures: Pyrethrum as space spray can be used. DDT, HCH and Dieldrin have become resistant.
c) Personal Protection Measures:
Use of Impregnated bed nets, repellants/ mosquito coils, full sleeved clothes, etc should be encouraged.