This document summarizes three Chinese blue and white fishnet bowls from the late Ming dynasty. It describes their excavation from sites in the Netherlands dating back to the 17th century, as well as their decoration featuring fishnet patterns on the exterior and aquatic motifs on the interior. The document also shows the bowls in a 1645 Dutch painting and mentions their salvage from a sunken 1643 ship carrying late Ming wares to China. It discusses how the fishnet pattern originated in Chinese ceramics and was favored by Japanese consumers, eventually becoming highly stylized in Edo period Japan.
This document summarizes three Chinese blue and white fishnet bowls from the late Ming dynasty. It describes their excavation from sites in the Netherlands dating back to the 17th century, as well as their decoration featuring fishnet patterns on the exterior and aquatic motifs on the interior. The document also shows the bowls in a 1645 Dutch painting and mentions their salvage from a sunken 1643 ship carrying late Ming wares to China. It discusses how the fishnet pattern originated in Chinese ceramics and was favored by Japanese consumers, eventually becoming highly stylized in Edo period Japan.
This document summarizes three Chinese blue and white fishnet bowls from the late Ming dynasty. It describes their excavation from sites in the Netherlands dating back to the 17th century, as well as their decoration featuring fishnet patterns on the exterior and aquatic motifs on the interior. The document also shows the bowls in a 1645 Dutch painting and mentions their salvage from a sunken 1643 ship carrying late Ming wares to China. It discusses how the fishnet pattern originated in Chinese ceramics and was favored by Japanese consumers, eventually becoming highly stylized in Edo period Japan.
Object description 1. Excavated from • VOC director Dr. Zacheus de Jager (1599-1650)’s residence (1630-1650) in Enkhuizen, Northern Netherlands • Leliegracht in Amsterdam • Vlissingen, Southern Netherlands 2. Size: approx. 14cm wide 3. Decoration: underglaze b/w fishnet pattern on the exterior; fishes, crabs, and aquatic weeds on the interior 4. Made in Jingdezhen, China; late Ming dynasty, Possibly Tianqi/Chongzhen periods (1620- 1644) 5.Discover Use of the world at blue domestic Leidenpigment University石子青 2 Also seen here.. Dutch Still Life Oil Painting, dated 1645 • 66.5x50.5cm, oil on oak • 17th century Amsterdam artist Jan Janz Treck (1605-1652) • Museum of Fine Arts, Budapest • Pewter, Kraak klapmuts, and an upside-down fishnet bowl Hatcher Cargo, sunk around 1643-46 • Found off Southern China coast in 1983 • Salvaged along with other late Ming transitional b/w wares • Pieces bearing inscription Guiwei 癸未 , cyclical year 1643
Discover the world at Leiden University 3
Museum pieces in Japan • Highly treasured as tea ceremony wares • Overglazed enamels or sometimes underglaze copper red • More applications on sake bottles, flasks, tea caddies, tea bowls, and wine cups or side dishes at various shapes and sizes
Discover the world at Leiden University 4
Origin and Continuity • Fish motifs in Song-Yuan ceramics • Auspicious pun on ‘surplus’ in Chinese • Net pattern almost absent in Chinese ceramics • Ordered by Japanese consumers? Ko- sometsuke • Imitated by early Imari wares • Fishnet pattern became very stylised in Edo Japan by removing animal motifs • Applications on other materials
Discover the world at Leiden University 5
Some thoughts • Why fishnet bowls intended for the Japanese market were found in the Netherlands?
• Unlike popular kraak or highly
received transitional wares, only broken excavated pieces and sunken ship wreckage, as opposed to heirlooms in Japan!