This document discusses whether websites constitute an offer or an invitation to treat. It notes that according to common law, displaying goods for sale is typically considered an invitation to treat rather than an offer. However, it is possible for a website to structure its advertisement as an offer through clear language establishing a unilateral or bilateral contract. The document also discusses different types of website-based contracts, including clickwrap agreements where a user must click "I agree" to terms, browsewrap where terms are accessible via hyperlink without express consent, and shrinkwrap agreements for software purchases. It notes clickwrap is most likely valid under Indian law while browsewrap and shrinkwrap can be challenged for lack of notice and assent.
This document discusses whether websites constitute an offer or an invitation to treat. It notes that according to common law, displaying goods for sale is typically considered an invitation to treat rather than an offer. However, it is possible for a website to structure its advertisement as an offer through clear language establishing a unilateral or bilateral contract. The document also discusses different types of website-based contracts, including clickwrap agreements where a user must click "I agree" to terms, browsewrap where terms are accessible via hyperlink without express consent, and shrinkwrap agreements for software purchases. It notes clickwrap is most likely valid under Indian law while browsewrap and shrinkwrap can be challenged for lack of notice and assent.
This document discusses whether websites constitute an offer or an invitation to treat. It notes that according to common law, displaying goods for sale is typically considered an invitation to treat rather than an offer. However, it is possible for a website to structure its advertisement as an offer through clear language establishing a unilateral or bilateral contract. The document also discusses different types of website-based contracts, including clickwrap agreements where a user must click "I agree" to terms, browsewrap where terms are accessible via hyperlink without express consent, and shrinkwrap agreements for software purchases. It notes clickwrap is most likely valid under Indian law while browsewrap and shrinkwrap can be challenged for lack of notice and assent.
Court’s view on Websites as offer or invitation to offer:
“Website advertisement is in principle no different from
a billboard outside a shop or an advertisement in a newspaper or periodical…
…Common law has recognised [that display of goods
for sale is] not an offer but are said to be an invitation to treat… Websites – offer or invitation to offer? The prospective buyer has to make an offer to purchase which is then accepted by the merchant. While this is the general principle for shop displays, it is open to a merchant to offer by way of an advertisement the mechanics of a unilateral or bilateral contract. This is essentially a matter of language, and intention, objectively ascertained. Websites – offer or invitation to offer? As with any normal contract, internet merchants have to be cautious how they present an advertisement, since this determines whether the advertisement will be construed as an invitation to treat or a unilateral contract. Loose language may result in inadvertently establishing contractual liability to a much wider range than wanted.
Any famous case comes to mind?
Types of website based contracts Clickwrap, Shrinkwrap and Browsewrap contracts Meaning
Clickwrap – On websites (or softwares etc.) the user is
sometimes asked to read the terms of service, privacy policy and disclaimers mentioned on the website and then click on 'I agree' button before such user avails any service or purchases any products advertised on the website. When such a user clicks on ‘I agree‘ button, he is deemed to have read and consented to all the terms and conditions mentioned. Types of website based contracts Browsewrap Browsewrap terms do not require an express consent of the user and its terms are generally accessible through a hyperlink. Generally, in all e-commerce websites the terms and conditions are prominently displayed on the website and should at the earliest opportunity the attention of a user is drawn to read the same. Types of website based contracts Shrinkwrap – more applicable to software sold in the form of CD etc. Types of website based contracts Through the clear plastic wrap on the box, the purchaser can see the warning that states that the use of the software is subject to the terms of a license agreement contained inside.
In such as case, the full agreement cannot be read before
purchasing the software. Types of website based contracts Validity Clickwrap – Governed by section 10A of the IT Act and are very likely to be considered valid since there is no dearth of notice and are displayed at the very start of the contract formation process (apart for unconscionability, which we will see later)
Browsewrap and Shrinkwrap – do you see any potential
problems? Types of website based contracts Browsewrap – susceptible to challenge for lack of notice and assent to terms – but what about constructive notice?
Shrinkwrap – shrink wrap agreements are susceptible to
challenge unless the buyer is afforded a right to return the software (and have the refund) should the terms be unacceptable to the buyer/user once he has had the opportunity to read it.