This document outlines the requirements for leading a discussion on assigned readings for an academic course. It specifies that students will be assigned a week to lead discussion in groups. They must meet with the professor beforehand to discuss their reflections on the material and draft two discussion questions. On the assigned date, the group will present a summary of the reading, their reflections, and lead a discussion using the questions. Finally, they must submit a 400-500 word reflective summary of the discussion on the university's learning management system. The document provides the reading assignments for one group's upcoming discussion on gender and sex.
This document outlines the requirements for leading a discussion on assigned readings for an academic course. It specifies that students will be assigned a week to lead discussion in groups. They must meet with the professor beforehand to discuss their reflections on the material and draft two discussion questions. On the assigned date, the group will present a summary of the reading, their reflections, and lead a discussion using the questions. Finally, they must submit a 400-500 word reflective summary of the discussion on the university's learning management system. The document provides the reading assignments for one group's upcoming discussion on gender and sex.
This document outlines the requirements for leading a discussion on assigned readings for an academic course. It specifies that students will be assigned a week to lead discussion in groups. They must meet with the professor beforehand to discuss their reflections on the material and draft two discussion questions. On the assigned date, the group will present a summary of the reading, their reflections, and lead a discussion using the questions. Finally, they must submit a 400-500 word reflective summary of the discussion on the university's learning management system. The document provides the reading assignments for one group's upcoming discussion on gender and sex.
This document outlines the requirements for leading a discussion on assigned readings for an academic course. It specifies that students will be assigned a week to lead discussion in groups. They must meet with the professor beforehand to discuss their reflections on the material and draft two discussion questions. On the assigned date, the group will present a summary of the reading, their reflections, and lead a discussion using the questions. Finally, they must submit a 400-500 word reflective summary of the discussion on the university's learning management system. The document provides the reading assignments for one group's upcoming discussion on gender and sex.
Preethi Krishnan Associate Professor Jindal Global Law School Internals – 50% Lead Discussion – 20%
Mid-Term Exam – 30%
Lead Discussion – 20% 1. Choose your week https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lesRH6Pov62DAkQq0mgitFmgzP3rhHMu/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=10 6639262063299371002&rtpof=true&sd=true
2. Meet with me (virtually) before your presentation as a group (5%)
In this meeting, you should come prepared with your thoughts on the material and two discussion questions. You only need to come with draft questions. I will help you formulate further. Your questions could be A) clarifying questions B) application of the concept in a different context C) Creative/Critical evaluation of the reading. 3. Present to the class (10%) A) Summary B) Your reflection on the reading C) Discussion Questions. You don’t need a power-point but you can if you want to. The team can decide if you want to split the reading presentation among its members or if they want to make a group effort of leading the discussions. All points are individual. Your marks are based entirely on your presentation, discussion with me, and your submission. 4. Reflective summary submission (400-500 words) to be uploaded on the UMS. (5%) For Friday Martin, E. (2017). The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles. Feminist Theory and the Body, 179-189. Fausto-Sterling, A. (1993). The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female Are Not Enough. The Sciences. Vol. 33, Issue 2, pp 20-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2326- 1951.1993.tb03081.x Chase, Cheryl. “Letter to the Sciences. RE: The Five Sexes, Intersex Society of North America. Isna. Org. Fausto-Sterling. ”The Five Sexes Revisited. The Sciences vol. 40,4 (2000): 18-23.