Quality Management System in MAHA-METRO

.
1
 Abstract of Concrete Quantity Executed ending October 2021.

Grade Of Concrete

TOTAL
Name of M35
Sr. No. Component
Contractors Qty.
Open (Cum)
M15 M25 M35 Pile M40 M45 M50 M55 M60 M70
Foundati
on

AF-SP(JV)
1 Stations Reach 3 378 0 72.25 97 3382.45 0 2607.95 0 0 0
6537.6
Stations 5

GRAND TOTAL

2
 Concrete Test Data – Compressive Strength, Std Dev & Concrete Permeability
October 2021 end
Sl. Contractor Concrete Quantity No of Avg. Reqt. Std. CV Concrete Used in (Structure
No Grade Execute Cubes Strength N/mm2. Dev. permeability Components)
d Tested (N/mm2) (min) (25mm-max)
(cum)

1 M40 3382.45 692 70.70 % 43 2.56 4.69 6 MM Segments,Slabs

2 AF- M50 2607.95 436 75.31 % 53 2.52 3.34 8 MM Segments

SP(JV) Pile
3 M35 (Pile) 97.00 21 50.10 % 38
Reach 3
Stations M35 (Open Pile cap, Foundation
4 72.25 9 52.12 % 38 work
Foundation)
5 M15 378.00 34 24.00% 18 Screed Work

3
FAT Summary – System Contractors
October 2021 end

4
 Quality Activities/Initiatives
October 2021 end

 Visits done on site (Civil works) and notes issued: 06 nos.

 Visits done on site (Systems works) and notes issued: nos.

 Document Verifications and notes issued: nos.

 QA & QC Review meetings: nos.

 Sensitization workshop: nos.

 Lectures by Experts : nos.

5
 Contribution / Improvements by the Quality Team (Civil)
October 2021 end

Sl. No Description Improvement Area

 Contribution / Improvements by the Quality Team (Systems)
October 2021 end

Sl. No Description Improvement Area

1
2
3

4
5
6
7
8

7
 Toolbox; Quality Circle & Quality Cluster (Intra Civil Contractors)
Cumulative data up to October 2021

Toolbox Quality Circles Quality Cluster

Sr. No. Reach Total no. of Total no. of Total no. of Total no. of Total no. of Total no. of
trainings trainees trainings trainees trainings trainees

NMRP
AF-SP(JV)
Reach 3
1 390 3880 95 756 05 24
Stations

TOTAL 390 3880 95 756 05 24

8
 Toolbox Trainings (Systems Contractors)
Cumulative data up to October 2021
Toolbox
Sr. No. Contractors
Total no. of trainings Total no. of trainees

PMRP
AF-SP(JV) Reach 3 Stations
1

TOTAL

9
 Test Data for

Concrete
&
Other Major Materials

10
 Summary of Concrete Cube Compressive Strength Tests ending october 21)
Qty Tests in 3rd
Sl. No of Test No of Test No of Tests Inhouse
Contractor Executed in party Remarks
No Required Done Failed Test
Cum laboratory
Cube Compressive Strength Test Samples (Frequency of Tests as per IS 456/ITP)
AF-SP(JV) Reach
6537.65
1 3 Stations 1192 1192 0 139 1048
Cum
6537.65
TOTAL 1192 1192 0 139 1048
  Cum  

11
 Quality Submittal (Systems Contractors)
October 2021 end

Quality & Snag/

Name of Quality Project Punch O&M Manual
Sr. No. submittals points (Approved/Total) Reference to letter no.
Contractor Manual In nos.
(approved/ (Closed/total)
Total nos.) In nos.

ITP -
1.GC/PMRP/PR3/STN/AFS/2020/
13483
2.GC/PMRP/PR3/STN/AFS/
2020/17677
3.GC/PMRP/PR3/STN/AFS/
AF-SP(JV) Reach 2019/7856
ITP – 3/4
1 3 Stations 4.SPCPL/PUNEMETRO/20-
QAP – 1/1 21/3583 (Awaited)

QAP -
GC/PMRP/PR3/STN/AFS/2019/74
73

12
 Summary of Testing Details of Steel Reinforcement ending Oct-2021)
Qty.
Sl. No of Test No of Test
Contractor Procured Frequency of Test Remarks
No Required Done
(MT)
AF-SP(JV) Reach Every 50 MT/Every 200 MT/ 1. All tests carried
1 2762.392 MT 55/13/276 119/23/282
3 Stations Every 10 MT out at 3rd party
Laboratory.

2. All Tests are

2762.392 MT satisfactory &
Total 55/13/276 119/23/282
Passed.

3. Tests Failed =0

13
 Summary of Testing Details of HT Strands / wires
up to October 2021 end

Tests in 3rd
Qty Executed Frequency of No of Test No of Test
Sl. No Contractor party Remarks
in MT Test Required Done
laboratory

HT Strands/Wires 15.2mm dia (TATA)

1. All tests carried

out at 3rd party
AF-SP(JV) Reach One Test for Every  7/7/2 11/11/2  11/11/2  Laboratory.
1 45.770 MT
3 Stations 5 Coils
2. All the results are
satisfactory &
Passed.

3. 1000 Hrs
Total Relaxation test
45.770 MT  7/7/2 11/11/2  11/11/2 
done for each
Contract & for each
Brand.
 

14
 Summary of test details for bearings
up to October 2021 end
Sl. No. No of Bearing No of Tests
Contractor Bearing types No of Test Done
Received at Site Required

Bearings (All tests carried out at Manufacturer’s Premises and cleared for dispatch to site after satisfactory results)

AF-SP(JV) Reach 3  Elastomeric (H/V/Pot) 1188/340/0 31/12/0  29/12/0

1
Station

Total 1188/340/0 31/12/0  29/12/0

15
Data for Rejection of
Concrete
&
Other Materials

16
 Concrete Rejection Details (Up to October 2021 end)

Sl. Contractor No of Loads Concrete Reason for Rejection Disposal status

No Rejected. Quantity
(Nos.) Rejected. (m3)

Rejected concrete utilized for Infra

Due to low Slump, Due to batching plant work in Labour colony, Same Concrete
breakdown, Due to high temperature, Due Used for infra work (Fabrication Shed
AF-SP(JV)
to High Slump. PCC & Trench PCC), Same Concrete
1 Reach 3 06 29.00 Cum Used for Labour Colony for safety tank
Station
filled.

TOTAL 29.00 CUM

17
 Details of Concrete Segments Rejections (Up to October 2021 end)

Sl. No. Contractor Items Rejected Quantity Reason for Rejection

Total Nos

Rejected segments are marked by X in Red and kept aside in Casting yards.
18
 Details of Material Rejections (Up to October 2021 end)

Sl. No. Contractor Items Rejected Quantity Reason for Rejection

1 20 MM Metal, 10 MM Metal 108.83 cum Material Rejected due to oversize

AF-SP(JV) Reach 3
Station
2 Ultratech OPC 53 Cement 24.90 MT Seal of Cement Bulker not match with invoice

19
 Details of GGBS Used in Concrete up to October – 2021 end
Cement Total Qty. of
Concrete Concrete Qty. GGBS
Reach Contractor Content % GGBS used GGBS used
Grade (Cum) per cum (kgs)
(kg/ Cum) (MT)

AF-SP(JV) M35 Pile 97.00 (314 Kg & 71% ) (126 Kg & 29 %) 126 Kg
Reach 3 12.22 MT
Reach 3 Station

            TOTAL 12.22 MT

20
 Use of PP Fibrillated Fibers in Concrete
Cumulative up to October 2021.

Total Qty.of Concrete Total qty.

Reach
In Cum with Fibres Of Fibres in Kg

NMRP

TOTAL

PP Fibrillated Fibers used are BAJAJ FIBRE GUARD from M/S BAJAJ Reinforcements LLP, Nagpur
21
 Assessment of CURING COMPOUND

Compressive Strength Test Comparison

Water Cured Cube Samples

Vs
Samples Cured using Curing Compound
( Include 4 graphs of different contractors of viaduct of different grades asper sample graph given in the next slide)

22
Water curing Vs Curing Compound - Concrete Cube Strength Comparison
GRADE : ---
SAMPLE GRAPH

23
THE END

24