Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 42

Foundation Engineering I

Hawassa University Institute of Technology


Department of Civil Engineering
Bereket Bezabih
beackon@gmail.com
2018/19
Chapter Four
Design of Shallow Foundations
Lecture Two
Contents
• Introduction
• Structural Design of Shallow Foundations
• Elements of Limit State Design
• Loads on Foundations
• Analysis of Section: Review of RCD
• Shear and Bonds
• Structural Detail Requirements
• References

2/26/23 HU-IOT Department of Civil Engineerig 3


Structural Design of Foundations
• Elements of Limit State Design
• Characteristics Material Strengths
• The strengths of materials upon which design is based are
those strengths below which results are unlikely to fall
• These are called 'characteristic‘ strengths

• The characteristic strength is taken as that value


below which it is unlikely that more than 5 per cent
of the results will fall

2/26/23 HU-IOT Department of Civil Engineerig 4


Structural Design of Foundations
• Elements of Limit State Design
• Characteristics Material Strengths
• Characteristics compressive strength of concrete,, for various
concrete grades are given in EBCS 2 as shown below
Grade of Concrete C15 C20 C25 C30 C40 C50 C60
(N/mm2) 12 16 20 24 32 40 48

• Characteristics tensile strength of concrete, can be determine


by;

2/26/23 HU-IOT Department of Civil Engineerig 5


Structural Design of Foundations
• Elements of Limit State Design
• Partial factor of Safety
• Other possible variations such as constructional tolerances are
allowed for by partial factors of safety applied to the strength of
the materials and to the loadings
• Partial factor of safety for materials
Partial Factor of Safety
Material 0.85 𝑓 𝑐𝑘
Limit State 𝐷𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡h 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒 , 𝑓 𝑐𝑑 = Comp.
Concrete Steel 𝛾𝑐

Ultimate 𝑓 𝑐𝑡𝑘
𝐷𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡h 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒 , 𝑓 𝑐𝑡𝑑 = Tens.
Flexure 1.5 1.15 𝛾𝑐
Shear 1.5 1.15
Bond 1.5 𝑓 𝑦𝑘
𝐷𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡h 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑙 , 𝑓 𝑦𝑑 =
Serviceability 1.0 1.0 𝛾𝑠

2/26/23 HU-IOT Department of Civil Engineerig 6


Structural Design of Foundations
• Elements of Limit State Design
• Partial factor of Safety
• Errors and inaccuracies may be due to a number of causes: design assumptions and
inaccuracy of calculation, possible unusual load increases, unforeseen stress
redistributions and constructional inaccuracies
• Partial factor of safety for loads

Load Combination and Partial Factor of Safety for Ultimate Limit State
Load Permanent Load, Variable Load, Wind,
Combination
Adverse Beneficial Adverse Beneficial

+ 1.35 1.35 1.5 0.0


+ 1.35 1.0 1.5
+ 1.35 1.35 1.35
2/26/23 HU-IOT Department of Civil Engineerig 7
Structural Design of Foundations
• Loads on Foundations
• Distributions of vertical loads on foundations
• For routine regular frame structures the loads on foundation
can be determine using the following assumptions
• The vertical dead load and live loads tributary to a particular
footing may be computed with reasonable accuracy as the sum of
loads half way through to the next adjacent gravity loads
• The vertical loads tributary footing include the loads at all floors
and also include the entire load from any cantilever that are
tributary to the support
• Any redistribution of dead and live loads due to flexural moments
can be ignored
Note that this is approximate method and for actual analysis code
provisions shall be consulted

2/26/23 HU-IOT Department of Civil Engineerig 8


Loads on Foundations
• Example 4.3
• Consider the following case of a commercial building .It is planned to
be constructed on a soil of USCS class CH. The shear strength of the
foundation soils is 60kPa, seismic zone 2A and wind speed of
100mph.The following data is provided for the dead load and live
load computations. Consider columns to be square 360mm .
A. For the building condition, determine the dead load on a typical interior column B3
B. For the same building and column determine the live load.
C. Determine the appropriate load combinations for LRFD design
a) Ultimate load for bearing capacity
b) Ultimate load for settlement  
Dead Load
Roof Floor surface
Roofing Wall around M E Roof Top Terrazzo Perimeter walls Shear walls
Equipment Room Concrete
0.72kN/m2 8.75kN/m 7.2kN/m2 0.9kN/m2 8.75N/m 9.23kN/m

Live Load
Roof Floor Partition Walls Stairwell
1.44kN/m2 2.88kN/m2 0.6kN/m2 4.79kN/m2

2/26/23 HU-IOT Department of Civil Engineerig 9


Loads on Foundations

2/26/23 HU-IOT Department of Civil Engineerig 10


Loads on Foundations

2/26/23 HU-IOT Department of Civil Engineerig 11


Loads on Foundations

2/26/23 HU-IOT Department of Civil Engineerig 12


Loads on Foundations

2/26/23 HU-IOT Department of Civil Engineerig 13


Structural Design of Foundations
• Analysis of Section: Review of RC Design
• Stress-Strain Relationships
• Concrete
• Stress-strain behavior of structural concrete is given below

The curve is parabolic until linear


afterwards
The u ,typical for all grades of concrete

The udesign stress is given by


where the factor 0.85 accounts for
difference between bending strength and
cylinder crushing strength

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 14


Structural Design of Foundations
• Analysis of Section: Review of RC Design
• Stress-Strain Relationships
• Reinforcement Steel
• The representative short term stress strain curve is given below
The behavior of steel is identical in compression
and tension i.e. linearly elastic after up to yield
point and plastic afterwards

The design yield strain can be computed for , and

𝜀 𝑦𝑘 =
( )𝑓 𝑦𝑘
𝛾𝑠
=
500 𝑘𝑃𝑎/ 1.15
= 0.00217
𝐸𝑠 200 𝑀𝑃𝑎

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 15


Structural Design of Foundations
• Analysis of Section: Review of RC Design
• Distribution of Stress and Strain Across a Section in Bending
• Flexural theory for reinforced concrete assumes that concrete cracks
in regions of tensile strain and all tensile stress is carried by steel
• It is also assumed that plain section remain plain after straining
hence there is a linear distribution of strain across the section

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 16


Structural Design of Foundations
• Analysis of Section: Review of RC Design
• Distribution of Stress and Strain Across a Section in
Bending
• Since there is compatibility of strains between steel and concrete,
relationship between steel strains in tension, and in compression
from strain diagram
• The relationship between depth of neutral axis, x, and maximum
concrete strains and steel strains is;

• For analysis of a section with known steel strains, the depth of


the neutral axis can be determined by rearranging as ;

• Hence, to ensure yielding of steel at ULS


2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 17
Structural Design of Foundations
• Analysis of Section: Review of RC Design
• Distribution of Stress and Strain Across a Section in
Bending
• To increase the degree of confidence, EC limits the depth of
neutral axis to for concrete grades less than C35/45 and for
higher grades of concrete
• is moment redistribution ration and for zero moment distribution
• for concrete and for
• These limiting values of neutral axis depth (xbal) are such that,
when reached, it is necessary to change the section design from
singly reinforced (tension steel only) to doubly reinforced
(compression and tension steel)
• The corresponding limiting value of moment is referred to as
the balanced section moment, Mbai

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 18


Structural Design of Foundations
• Analysis of Section: Review of RC Design
• Bending and the Equivalent Rectangular Stress Block
• The equivalent rectangular block can be used for ultimate limit
state design

Note that the equivalent rectangular


block does not extend to the neutral
axis but to s=0.8x hence its centroid
will be s/2=0.4x

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 19


Structural Design of Foundations
• Analysis of Section: Review of RC Design
• Bending and the Equivalent Rectangular Stress Block
• Singly reinforced rectangular Sections
• Bending of such a section induce a tensile force Fst in steel and compressive
force Fcc in the concrete
• For equilibrium the ultimate moment , M ,must be balanced by the moment of
resistance of the section

, where z is the moment arm


and

Hence and replacing s


if we let

Solving for z,

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 20


Structural Design of Foundations
• Analysis of Section: Review of RC Design
• Bending and the Equivalent Rectangular Stress Block
• Singly reinforced rectangular Sections cont…
• On the other hand,
• Hence,
• For concrete grades less than C35/45 the zbal =0.82d
• Hence

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 21


Structural Design of Foundations
• Analysis of Section: Review of RC Design
• Bending and the Equivalent Rectangular Stress Block
• Singly reinforced rectangular Sections cont…
• The moment resistance of a given section may be computed by;

Hence depth of stress block s,

and x=s/0.8

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 22


Structural Design of Foundations
• Analysis of Section: Review of RC Design
• Bending and the Equivalent Rectangular Stress Block
• Doubly reinforced rectangular Sections

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 23


Structural Design of Foundations
• Analysis of Section: Review of RC Design
• Bending and the Equivalent Rectangular Stress Block
• Doubly reinforced rectangular Sections
• When the ultimate moment exceeds balanced moment for the
section i.e. for C35/40,compressive reinforcement is required
• For this condition the EC restricts to ensure tension failure

• The equilibrium of doubly reinforced section is given by;

• With

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 24


Structural Design of Foundations
• Analysis of Section: Review of RC Design
• Bending and the Equivalent Rectangular Stress Block
• Doubly reinforced rectangular Sections
• Taking moment about the centroid of tension steel As

• Multiplying both sides by zbal and rearranging gives

with zbal=0.82d

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 25


Structural Design of Foundations
• Analysis of Section: Review of RC Design
• Bending and the Equivalent Rectangular Stress Block
• Doubly reinforced rectangular Sections cont…
• Substituting Kbal and K=M/fckbd2

• Here it is assumed that the compression steel has also yielded, so


fsc=0.87fyk
• From the proportion of strain distribution of diagram

so that,

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 26


Structural Design of Foundations
• Analysis of Section: Review of RC Design
• Bending and the Equivalent Rectangular Stress Block
• Doubly reinforced rectangular Sections cont…
• At yield with fsy=460N/mm2,the strain in steel
• For yielding of compression steel

• If is necessary to calculate the strain and compute

Limiting constant values


Concrete Grades
<C35/45 >C35/45
Limiting 0.45 0.35
Maximum z(zbal) 0.82d 0.86d
Kbal 0.167 0.136
Limiting d’/d 0.194 0.151
2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 27
Structural Design of Foundations
• Shear and Bonds
• Shear
• The shear capacity of concrete is given by

Where
design shear resistance of a section without shear reinforcement

area of tensile reinforcement that extends beyond the critical


section by at least full anchorage plus effective depth
the smallest width of the section in tensile area in mm

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 28


• Shear and Bonds
• Table Summaries for
Concrete shear
Capacity

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 29


Structural Design of Foundations
• Shear and Bonds
• Shear
• Shear stresses in subjected to uniformly loaded slabs are
sufficiently resisted by the concrete shear strength i.e. with out
the need for shear reinforcement
• The ultimate shear force is made less than the concrete shear
strength
• If the allowable shear stress and the applied ultimate shear
stress the design requirement shall be

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 30


Structural Design of Foundations
• Shear and Bonds
• Punching Shear
• Concentrated loads on slabs
cause shear stress on
section around the loads
area known as punching
shear
• The critical surface for
checking punching shear is
located at 2d from the loads
area

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 31


Structural Design of Foundations
• Shear
• Punching Shear
• The maximum shear force that can be carried by the slab
without shear reinforcement can be computed using the
previous equations
• If the slab has two way tensile reinforcement
• Hence, the resistance force shall be

Where length of punching perimeter


Average effective depth

• The maximum permissible shear force, ,must also be checked


2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 32
Structural Design of Foundations
• Bond (Anchor, Development Laps)
• Basic anchor length for good bond condition,,is given by

• The basic anchor length must be modified further to give minimum net
anchor length,, to account for other factors

0.3 in tension
0.6 in compression
or 100mm

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 33


Structural Design of Foundations
• Bond (Anchor, Development Laps)
• The lap length required is given by
where
1 for compression laps
1 for tension laps with 30% lapped bars and cover is greater
than 2 diameters and spacing between adjacent sets of
lapped bars is greater than 6 diameters, otherwise 1.4
1.4 for tension laps with greater than 30% lapped bars
2 if the above conditions are not met
• The absolute minimum lap,

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 34


Structural Design of Foundations
• Structural Detailing Requirements
• Minimum Cover
• The minimum cover is a function of concrete mix quality, fire resistance
and performance environment
• Cover of reinforcement is shown as nominal,
• is an allowance for construction deviation

• Traditional the minimum cover for superstructure 25mm and
substructure 50mm is adequate
• Please consult codes for detailed directions

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 35


Structural Design of Foundations
• Structural Detailing Requirements
• Maximum Spacing of Reinforcements: Crack Control
• Cracking due to loading can be controlled by ensuring the clear
space between longitudinal reinforcement is as shown in the
table below
• The steel stress shown in the table is computed by using

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 36


Structural Design of Foundations
• Structural Detailing Requirements
• Maximum Bar Diameter: Crack Control
• When cracking is as a result of restraint to shrinkage or thermal
effects then the bar sizes must be limited as indicated in table
below
• But the maximum spacing limits of before do not need to be
applied
• The steel stress to be used in table can be calculated from the
expression

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 37


Structural Design of Foundations
• Structural Detailing Requirements
• Minimum Spacing of Reinforcements
• To permit concrete flow around reinforcement during
construction, the clear distance between bars should not be
less than
• the maximum bar size,
• 20 mm, or
• the maximum aggregate size plus 5 mm (if the aggregate size
exceeds 32mm), whichever is the greater figur

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 38


Structural Design of Foundations
• Structural Detailing Requirements
• Minimum Area of Reinforcement
• For quick reference the principal requirements, to be checked
at the detailing stage, are as specified below

Tension Reinforcement in beams and Concrete Class (


Slabs
C25/30 C30/35 C40/50 C50/60

0.0013 0.0015 0.0018 0.0021


Secondary Reinforcement >20% main reinforcement

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 39


Structural Design of Foundations
• Structural Detailing Requirements
• Minimum Area of Reinforcement
• For most purposes, thermal and shrinkage cracking can be
controlled within acceptable limits by the use of minimum
reinforcement quantities

area of concrete within tensile zone


tensile strength of concrete suggested value 3N/mm2
stress distribution coefficient 1 for pure tension 0.4 for flexure
non linear stress distribution coefficient should be taken as 0.8
but for rectangular section greater than 800mm 0.5 may be
used other wise take 1.0

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 40


Structural Design of Foundations
• Structural Detailing Requirements
• Maximum Area of Reinforcement
• These are determined from practical need to achieve adequate
compaction of the concrete around the reinforcement
• For a slab or beam, tension or compression reinforcement

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 41


Reference values
Concrete Grades C15 C20 C25 C30 C40 C50 C60

fck(N/mm2) 12 16 20 24 32 40 48
fctm(N/mm2) 1.572 1.905 2.210 2.496 3.024 3.509 3.962

fctk(N/mm2) 1.101 1.333 1.547 1.747 2.117 2.456 2.774


fbd(N/mm2) (High
Bond) 1.651 2.000 2.321 2.621 3.175 3.684 4.160

2/26/23 HU-IOT Civil Eng'g Department 42

You might also like