Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Financial Statements Analysis - Students
Financial Statements Analysis - Students
18 Analysis
Learning Objectives
Apply horizontal and vertical analysis to financial
1 statements.
18-1
LEARNING Apply horizontal and vertical analysis to
1
OBJECTIVE financial statements.
Comparison Tools of
Characteristics
Bases Analysis
18-2 LO 1
Horizontal Analysis
18-3 LO 1
Horizontal Analysis
Illustration 18-5
Horizontal analysis of
balance sheets
18-4 LO 1
Horizontal Analysis
Illustration 18-6
Horizontal analysis of
Income statements
18-5
LO 1
Horizontal Analysis
Illustration 18-7
Horizontal analysis of The ending retained earnings increased 38.6%. As
retained earnings
statements indicated earlier, the company retained a significant
portion of net income to finance additional plant facilities.
18-6 LO 1
Vertical Analysis
18-7 LO 1
Vertical Analysis
Illustration 18-8
Vertical analysis of
balance sheets
Quality is choosing to
finance its growth
through retention of
earnings rather than
through issuing
additional debt.
18-8 LO 1
Vertical Analysis
Illustration 18-9
Vertical analysis of
Income statements
Quality appears
to be a profitable
enterprise that is
becoming even more
successful.
18-9 LO 1
Vertical Analysis
Illustration 18-10
Intercompany income statement comparison
18-10 LO 1
DO IT! 1 Horizontal Analysis
18-11 LO 1
Particular Interest
What would be important to you in studying a company's financial
statements?
18-12
LEARNING Analyze a company’s performance using
2
OBJECTIVE ratio analysis.
18-13 LO 2
Ratio Analysis
18-14 LO 2
Ratio Analysis
Liquidity Ratios
Illustration 18-12
18-16 LO 2
Ratio Analysis Liquidity Ratios
1. CURRENT RATIO
Illustration 18-12
2013 2012
1.52:1
Ratio of 2.96:1 means that for every dollar of current liabilities, Quality
has $2.96 of current assets.
18-17 LO 2
Investor Insight
How to Manage the Current Ratio
The apparent simplicity of the current ratio can have real-world limitations
because adding equal amounts to both the numerator and the denominator
causes the ratio to decrease.
2. ACID-TEST RATIO
Illustration 18-13
2013 2012
18-19 LO 2
QUALITY DEPARTMENT STORE INC. QUALITY DEPARTMENT STORE INC.
Balance Sheet (partial) Balance Sheet (partial)
Illustration 18-12
18-20 LO 2
Ratio Analysis Liquidity Ratios
2. ACID-TEST RATIO
Illustration 18-14
2013 2012
0.47:1
18-21 LO 2
QUALITY DEPARTMENT STORE INC.
QUALITY DEPARTMENT STORE INC.
Condensed Income Statements
Balance Sheet (partial)
For the Years Ended December 31
2013 2012 2013 2012
18-22 LO 2
Ratio Analysis Liquidity Ratios
2013 2012
69.1 times
$2,097,000
= 10.2 times
($180,000 + $230,000) / 2
18-24 LO 2
QUALITY DEPARTMENT STORE INC.
QUALITY DEPARTMENT STORE INC.
Condensed Income Statements
Balance Sheet (partial)
For the Years Ended December 31
2013 2012 2013 2012
Illustration 18-12
18-25 LO 2
Ratio Analysis Liquidity Ratios
4. INVENTORY TURNOVER
Illustration 18-16
2013 2012
3.1 times
4. INVENTORY TURNOVER
$1,281,000
= 2.3 times
($500,000 + $620,000) / 2
18-27 LO 2
Ratio Analysis
Profitability Ratios
18-29 LO 2
Ratio Analysis Profitability Ratios
5. PROFIT MARGIN
Illustration 18-17
2013 2012
5.3%
18-30 LO 2
QUALITY DEPARTMENT STORE INC.
QUALITY DEPARTMENT STORE INC.
Condensed Income Statements
Condensed Balance Sheets
For the Years Ended December 31
2013 2012 2013 2012
Illustration 18-12
18-31 LO 2
Ratio Analysis Profitability Ratios
6. ASSET TURNOVER
Illustration 18-18
2013 2012
1.3 times
Illustration 18-12
18-33 LO 2
Ratio Analysis Profitability Ratios
7. RETURN ON ASSETS
Illustration 18-19
2013 2012
7.0%
18-34 LO 2
QUALITY DEPARTMENT STORE INC.
QUALITY DEPARTMENT STORE INC.
Condensed Income Statements
Condensed Balance Sheets
For the Years Ended December 31
2013 2012 2013 2012
Illustration 18-12
18-35 LO 2
Ratio Analysis Profitability Ratios
2013 2012
24.2%
Shows how many dollars of net income the company earned for each
dollar invested by the owners.
18-36 LO 2
Ratio Analysis Profitability Ratios
Illustration 18-21
Return on common stockholders’
equity with preferred stock
18-37 LO 2
QUALITY DEPARTMENT STORE INC.
QUALITY DEPARTMENT STORE INC.
Condensed Income Statements
Condensed Balance Sheets
For the Years Ended December 31
2013 2012 2013 2012
Illustration 18-12
18-38 LO 2
Ratio Analysis Profitability Ratios
2013 2012
18-39 LO 2
QUALITY DEPARTMENT STORE INC.
QUALITY DEPARTMENT STORE INC.
Condensed Income Statements
Condensed Balance Sheets
For the Years Ended December 31
2013 2012 2013 2012
Illustration 18-12
18-40 LO 2
Ratio Analysis Profitability Ratios
2013 2012
13.5 times
18-41 LO 2
QUALITY DEPARTMENT STORE INC.
QUALITY DEPARTMENT STORE INC.
Condensed Income Statements
Condensed Balance Sheets
For the Years Ended December 31
2013 2012 2013 2012
Illustration 18-12
18-42 LO 2
Ratio Analysis Profitability Ratios
2013 2012
24.2%
Solvency Ratios
18-44 LO 2
QUALITY DEPARTMENT STORE INC.
QUALITY DEPARTMENT STORE INC.
Condensed Income Statements
Condensed Balance Sheets
For the Years Ended December 31
2013 2012 2013 2012
Illustration 18-12
18-45 LO 2
Ratio Analysis Solvency Ratios
2013 2012
71.1%
18-46 LO 2
QUALITY DEPARTMENT STORE INC.
QUALITY DEPARTMENT STORE INC.
Condensed Income Statements
Condensed Balance Sheets
For the Years Ended December 31
2013 2012 2013 2012
Illustration 18-12
18-47 LO 2
Ratio Analysis Solvency Ratios
Summary of Ratios
Illustration 18-27
18-49 LO 2
Summary of Ratios
Illustration 18-27
18-50 LO 2
LEARNING Apply the concept of sustainable
3
OBJECTIVE income.
18-51 LO 3
DO IT! 3 Unusual Items
18-52 LO 3
DO IT! 3 Unusual Items
18-53 LO 3
18-54
BALANCE SHEET INCOME STATEMENT
Cash 1 A/P 8 Sales 200
A/R 10 Longterm loan 70 COGS (150)
Inventory 20 Gross profit 50
Equipment 100 Equity 53 Operating expense (20)
131 131 Profit 30
ROE 57%
Gearing 247%
ROA 23%
Profit margin 15%
Asset turnover 1.5
A/R turnover 20.0
Inventory turnover 7.5
A/P turnover 18.8
Liquidity ratio 3.9
Quick ratio 1.4
18-55
Financial ratios
Profitability
Sales margin
Earnings per share (EPS)
Profitability and return: the return on capital employed (ROCE)
Analyzing profitability and return in more detail: the
secondary ratios
Liquidity
current ratio
quick ratio
accounts receivable payment period
inventory turnover period
accounts payable payment period
Gearing
Financial Gearing
Operating gearing
18-56
Suggested format of a ratio
analysis
18-57
How it has changed
18-58
Why it has changed & Comments
18-59
A puzzle is a game, problem, or toy that tests a person's
ingenuity or knowledge. In a puzzle, the solver is expected
to put pieces together in a logical way, in order to arrive at
the correct solution of the puzzle.
18-60
A company is doing business in Vietnam
18-61
Basic Limitations of Ratio Analysis
The ratios are only as good as the data upon which they are based and
the information with which they are compared.
Data
• They are based on historical cost, which can lead to distortions in
measuring performance.
• Where estimated items (such as depreciation and amortization) are
significant, income ratios lose some of their credibility
• Reliability of data
• Weak regulation
• Gap between Vietnamese standards vs IFRS (e.g. Goodwill, Noncurrent assets)
Comparison
The difficult problem of achieving comparability among firms in a
given industry because of basic differences in accounting (e.g.
Depreciation methods)
18-62
Vietnamese accounting standards vs IFRS
https://kienthucketoanthue.wordpress.com/201
6/11/20/so-sanh-chuan-muc-ke-toan-viet-nam-v
a-quoc-te-deloitte/
http://kdtqt.duytan.edu.vn/Home/ArticleDetail/v
n/33/2352/loi-the-thuong-mai-diem-khac-biet-gi
ua-ke-toan-viet-nam-va-quoc-te
18-63