Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bill of Lading
Bill of Lading
Alfred Ofori-Abebrese
Regional Maritime University
Accra, Ghana
DEFINITION OF CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE
– provide cargo
– give an accurate and adequate information about the nature of the goods
This clause defines the actual carrier whose responsibility to carry the cargo.
Bill of lading signed by the master himself or by the others on his behalf
usually bind the shipowners as carriers, since the owners are the master’s
principals.
However, where the vessel is demise or time chartered, the party which
appoints the master and who is therefore normally his principal is the
demise charterer rather than the owner. In such circumstances, a
signature by the master, or by others on his behalf, will normally bind the
demise charterer or agent as the carrier.
BILL OF LADINGS CLAUSES
CLAUSE PARAMOUNT
A clause in the bill of lading or the charter party which stipulates that the
contract of carriage is governed by rules of a specified convention or a
particular statute. In most cases stipulating that the contract of carriage is
governed by the Hague Rules or the Hague-Visby Rules.
BILL OF LADINGS CLAUSES
HIMALAYA CLAUSE
A clause which is incorporated into the charter party or bill of lading contract
to provide agents, servants, sub-contractors…(etc) of the carrier the
benefits of all exclusions and limitations enjoyed by the actual carrier
under the bill of lading which protects them from consignees or endorsees
for the claims in contract or tort.
BILL OF LADING CLAUSES
LIEN CLAUSE
TRANSHIPMENT CLAUSE
This clause sets out the rights of the carrier in the circumstance of the
consignee’s failure to take delivery of the goods. For instance, if for any
reason whatsoever the consignee refuses or fails to take delivery of the
goods upon their being discharged and made available at the port of
discharge or place designated for delivery regardless of the free time
prescribed by tariff or local regulation, the carrier shall have the right
without notice to unstuff the goods and to store them at the risk of the cargo
owner. Such storage shall constitute final delivery hereunder and thereupon
all liability whatsoever of the carrier with respect of the goods shall cease.
BILL OF LADINGS CLAUSES
Where the bill of lading contains a clause excluding liability for a latent defect,
it has been interpreted to mean a defect that could not be discovered on
such an examination that a reasonable skilled man would make. In other
words, a defect not obvious from a cursory inspection.
BILL OF LADINGS CLAUSES
TIME-BAR CLAUSE
For example, all liabilities whatsoever of the carrier shall cease unless suit is
brought within 12 months after delivery of the goods or 12 months after
the date when the goods should have been delivered.
BILL OF LADINGS CLAUSES
Clause relating to the period where the carrier should be notified of loss or damage.
For example, unless notice of loss of or damage to the goods and general nature of
delivery, as applicable, before or at the time of the removal of the goods into the
custody of the person entitled to delivery thereof under the bill of lading or if the
loss or damage be not apparent within three consecutive days thereafter, such
removal shall be prima facie evidence of the delivery of the carrier of the goods as
described in the bill of lading. Notice of any claim shall be addressed to carrier’s
LIBERTY CLAUSE
The shipper shall be deemed to have guaranteed to the carrier the accuracy,
at the time the goods were accepted by the carrier, of the description of
the goods, marks, number, quantity and weight and any statement as to
the content of the containers or other packages as furnished by him; and
the shipper shall indemnify the carrier of all losses, damage and expenses
arising or resulting from inaccuracies or inadequacies of such particulars.
BILL OF LADINGS CLAUSES
When container is stuffed by shipper or his agent, the bill of lading shall be a
receipt only for the container and the carrier shall not be responsible for
count of the contents, nor for concealed damage or for improper loading
or missing of articles in the container. Carrier shall not be liable for any
loss, damage or injury caused by improper stuffing of container when such
has been performed by the shipper or on the shipper’s behalf.
BILL OF LADINGS CLAUSES
Where the contract expressly excludes liability from perils of the sea, the
courts have interpreted it to refer to any damage that have been caused
by storms, sea water, collision, stranding or perils that peculiar to the sea
and which could not have been avoided by exercise of reasonable care.
BILL OF LADINGS CLAUSES
ARREST OR RESTRAINT CLAUSE
An arrest clause in a bill of lading excluding liability for loss or damage due to
arrest or restraint of the vessel. This clause has been interpreted to apply
to a number of situations.
It has successfully invoked where the government of a country takes
possession of the goods through embargo, arrests, or blockades; where
there is the prohibition of the importation of the goods; or where the
goods cannot be discharged due to quarantine restrictions. It does not
however apply to situations where there is restriction imposed on sea
routes for safety of shipping or to any political disturbances.
BILL OF LADINGS CLAUSES
STRIKES CLAUSE
CASPIANA CLAUSE
The bill of lading may contain a clause that allows the carrier to discharge
goods for a strike-bound port at any safe and convenient port.
Where there is a caspiana clause, the consignee will not be able to recover
the cost of transshipment of the goods to the original destination once the
strike is over.
BILL OF LADINGS CLAUSES
BOTH TO BLAME CLAUSE
This is a clause where the cargo owners indemnify the carrier against liability
to another vessel in collision. For instance, in case of collision with another
ship as a result of the of the negligence of the other ship and any act,
neglect, or default of the master, mariner, or pilot, or the servants of the
Carrier in the navigation or in the management of the ship, the owners of
the goods carried here-under will indemnify the carrier of all loss or
liability to the other or non-carrying ship or her owners in so far as loss or
liability represents loss of, or damage to, or any claim whatsoever of the
owners of the said goods, paid or payable by the other or non-carrying
ship or her owners to the owners of the said goods and set-off, recouped
or recovered by the other or non-carrying ship or her owners as part of
their claim against the carrying ship or carrier.
OTHER TRANSPORT DOCUMENTS
Ship’s delivery order
The Fraudsters create a fake set of Bills of Lading that looks sufficiently
genuine against which they seek to take delivery of the cargo in advance
of the genuine Receiver.
This fraud may have received some “Insider” assistance, as the
Fraudsters will need key information – if not a copy of the genuine Bill –
in order to ensure they can achieve delivery at the discharge Port.
Lesson Learned:
Ensuring that there is always a clear chain of custody for any set of
original Bills is very important.
Agents, if they want to avoid being held liable, will also have to ensure
that they conduct proper checks against documents presented to
ensure their genuine nature. If in doubt, a phone call can help to clear
up many issues and concerns. If, however, serious concerns persist
(such as clear errors or inconsistencies on documents) then calling a
“halt” to operations will be a prudent step to take.
CASE SCENARIO:
“Fake Cargo Sale” – a parallel transaction
The Fraudsters will seek to create genuine looking Bills of Lading or other Cargo Documents,
copying corporate styles and logos, and going as far as including genuine ship and shipment
details. The Fraudsters appear to be well informed about the particular type of cargo being
shipped.
In one particular case, the Fraudsters knew of the exact trading pattern of a Member’s vessel and
were able to give credible details of her route and alleged cargo, so as to make the transaction
appear legitimate. They offered to sell a cargo that allegedly was on board, but the vessel was in
fact trading a different cargo altogether that had been sold already to genuine buyers from
genuine sellers.
The Fraudsters seek to gain by seeking a Buyer for their alleged cargo and then either obtaining
payment direct or by way of a Letter of Credit opened in their favour as part of the transaction.
In some cases involving the Container Industry, the Fraudsters go so far as to create fake websites,
and give fake tracking numbers, to give the appearance of a genuine shipment that can be tracked
“live”.
LESSON LEARNED :
Fraudsters can take significant steps to create a legitimate appearance for their scheme.
Cursory or brief checks may be insufficient to detect the underlying scam. Unless dealing
with known and proven counterparties (who confirm the deal back) extra caution should
be taken to ensure a particular proposed offer is in fact genuine
One particular Red Flag to this type of Fraud is that the offered cargo may be at a
significant discount to prevailing market prices, and aiming at trapping a Buyer with a deal
that is “too good to pass on”.
CASE SCENARIO:
Freight Forwarder issues/re-issues Bills of Lading with cargo miss-
descriptions
The Master of the vessel has the responsibility and right to issue Bills of Lading for the cargo laden on his
ship. In practice this is often delegated / contracted out to Charterers and their Shipping Agents on the basis
that any Bills issued must conform with Mate’s Receipts issued during the loading operation.
It is important to ensure that Bills do accurately reflect the cargo laden, because a knowing miss-declaration,
for instance claiming that a cargo of cars is “new” while they are fitted with old engines, is a fraud. The 3rd
Party Buyer of the cargo expects new cars, not refurbished vehicles, and he is paying the price for new cars.
This can create problems for ship-owners where the Bills are issued, or perhaps re-issued, by a Party several
steps removed in the contractual chain, and these Bills contain clearly inaccurate information. The Owner
may not even know that this event has occurred, until confronted with a cargo claim at the discharge Port.
Typically the “fraud” will involve:
a deliberate over statement as to quantity laden
a knowing miss-description of the cargo laden
the post or ante dating of the Bill of Lading
This is done in order to ensure documents pass as “clean” through the Banking system, obtain more sale
proceeds, and put the transaction into sale and Letter of Credit “windows”. In all cases, however,
misinformation is used to obtain financial benefit, or greater financial benefit, than should have been due
had accurate information been provided.
LESSON LEARNED:
Delegating an important right/obligation such as issuing cargo documents should only be done to trusted
counterparties and in line with clear indemnities and counter-obligations to protect the Owner. If a cargo is
laden that clearly is not “new” or “clean” then extra care has to be taken that any cargo document issued
very precisely describes the exact nature of the cargo
CASE SCENARIO:
the “Trojan” Container
The Containerization of global trade has given incredible benefits to shipping and the
world economy, yet has also given rise to numerous opportunities for fraud.
The “Trojan” Container is the one that is alleged to contain a certain specific cargo, yet
upon discharge it turns out that the contents are quite different. This type of fraud
includes:
Cargo of plastic shipped for recycling contained a small amount of used diapers
Cargo of rolls of textiles contained smuggled cigarettes
Various methods to hide drugs
Waste and rubbish, or other redundant material to give the impression of [x] tons weight, but the
real goods were never shipped (but were paid for)
LESSON LEARNED:
The volume of containerization as well as the need for fast processing leaves little time
to ensure that cargo manifests are checked rigorously and even then physical contents
are not routinely checked against the manifest by the vessel (that would be a logistical
and practical impossibility in the trade).
A great degree of reliance is therefore placed on Freight Forwarders to ensure that
both contents and weight are properly declared. In case of concern, it is better to
isolate a box and have it inspected, even leaving it behind, rather than risk a vessel
with thousands of boxes on board being detained for alleged immigration, customs and
other legal infringements at the discharge Port.
SPECIFIC RED FLAGS (CHECKLISTS)
COUNTERPARTY ISSUES
Identities of unknown or new Brokers and Principals could not be
verified independently
Supposedly separate entities share postal addresses and/or there
are other contact detail inconsistencies
Counterparty or Intermediary’s activities are being undertaken
away from the place/jurisdiction where their registered address
places them
Excessive pressure or aggressive behavior in pushing for a deal
combined with a willingness to overlook or waive “discrepancies”
Avoidance to questions requiring clear answers
SPECIFIC RED FLAGS (CHECKLISTS) CONT.
DOCUMENTARY ISSUES
The proposed trade and the proposed shipping and finance
documents are inconsistent
Incomplete cargo documents or information thereon is
inconsistent with the usual terms of the trade
Documents with alterations outside of normal trade practice
Post or out dated Cargo Documents
Documents contain errors or otherwise have suspect validity
SPECIFIC RED FLAGS (CHECKLISTS) CONT.
TRANSACTION ISSUES
The proposed transaction is highly undervalued or provides for
an unusual profit margin
The trade is unusual in terms of its nature or geography
Payment is to be made/received in cash
Numerous Intermediaries are involved, more than usual in any
event
Requests for unexplained payments
Overly complex transaction(s)
Routing of funds via third parties or countries
Unexplained changes to transaction details