Local Government and Capability Development Division

Local Planning and Development Section

DTP Analysis and Capacity Development

(CapDev) Analysis Results

Department of the Interior and Local Government - Cordillera

24 October 2022
 Phasing of Assumption
Objectives

OFFICE TOP FUNCTIONS & SERVICES 2022 2023 2024

ASSUMED
AGRICULTURE Organization of Cooperatives 2 1 2
Animal breeding stations 1 1 4
On-site research facilities 0 2 4
HEALTH Health services which include 1 0 5
hospitals and other tertiary
services
IRRIGATION Irrigation Systems 2 0 3
INFRASTRUCTURE Roads and bridges 2 0 3
On-site research facilities 1 0 1
 Phasing of Assumption
Objectives

OFFICE TOP FSF ASSUMED 2022 2023 2024

ENVIRONMENT Responsible for the 3 0 0

implementation and enforcement
of solid waste management in their
locality; the creation of SWM
Boards at the provincial/city and
municipal LGUs; and the
preparation of LGU SWM plans
Enforcement of small-scale mining 2 1 3
Enforcement of other laws on 1 0 5
environment protection
Enforcement of community-based 1 0 5
forestry projects
Proposed
Objectives
Additional Plantilla Positions
OFFICE ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICAL MANAGERIAL

AGRICULTURE 19 98 10
HEALTH 35 581 346
IRRIGATION 2 47 0
TOURISM 3 4 0
SOCIAL WELFARE 10 48 27
ENVIRONMENT 27 14 7
FINANCE 10 29 7
DRRM 44 29 4
 Total Proposed Additional Plantilla Position by Position Level
Objectives
1,000

900

800
No. of Proposed Additional Plantilla Positions

700

600
Managerial
500
Technical
400 Adminis-
581 trative
300

200

100 98 29
47 48 14 29 44
19 35 4
3 10 27 10
0 1
0 2 0 0 0 0 1
0 0
0
th t
re io
n
al io
n re
st
ry m A LG re
IC
T
en gy ce RM i ng
ult u
c at e gat tu
uc du ur
is CD DI el
fa
nm ner
nan R us
ric u H i r o E Fi D o
Ed Irr st In T lW iro H
Ag ra d ia v
In
f an c En
de So
a
Tr

Office
 Provincial/ HUC CapDev Analysis Results
900 33.91% Foundational CapDev
800 Basic minimums required for LGUs to
700 implement the requisites of full
600 devolution
500
400
300 66.08% Enabling CapDev
Basic minimums required to provide a
200 conducive environment for local governance
100 and development
0
a l g al
n lin n t
ti o b e 9.34% Developmental CapDev
a
n da E n
o pm Basic minimums required to required to align
o u el
ev
LGU-specific development priorities with area-
F
D wide and/or provincial-regional development
 Provincial and HUC CapDev Analysis
Comparative Results

Enabling CapDev Foundational

CapDev
1. Abra 3 LGUs
4 LGUs 1. Apayao
2. Ifugao
3. Kalinga 2. Baguio City
4. Mountain Province 3. Benguet
 Provincial/ HUC CapDev
Analysis Results
66.08% Enabling CapDev:
• Risk exposure and resilience
readiness;
• Social profiling and protection;
• Area-wide environmental
management;
• Education, employment, and
livelihood;
• Health management and compliance;
• Sectoral engagement;
• Regulatory simplification;
• Tourism and the arts
Provincial/ HUC
CapDev Analysis
Results
33.91% Foundational CapDev
• Use of information-based systems
• Internal controls and accountability
measures
• Public expenditure and fiscal management
• Local development planning
• Program implementation and operations
• Monitoring and evaluation systems
• Performance management and assessment
• Local legislation
• Community mobilization
• ICT and digital solutions
Provincial/ HUC CapDev
Analysis Results
9.34% Developmental CapDev
• Sectoral, inter-sectoral,
geographical, and political-
territorial alignment to effect
LGU-specific outcomes
• Inter-LGU arrangements
• National-local arrangements
• High investment
collaboration
• NGA CapDevs
 Provincial and HUC CapDev Analysis
Comparative Results
460

163 168
113
89 62 68 36
9 18 32 12 16
6 4 5
Abra0 Apayao Baguio 3
0 Benguet Ifugao Kalinga 0 MP 0
93.68% 94.76% 87.32% 41.86% 67.75% 79.86% 100%
Enabling Foundational Foundational Foundational Enabling Enabling Enabling
Capdev Capdev Capdev Capdev Capdev Capdev Capdev

37.20%
Developmental
CapDev
 Provincial and HUC CapDev Analysis
Capacity Pillar Overview

ENABLING
STRUCTURE 25% 6.04% POLICIES

CAPACITY
KNOWLEDGE &
COMPETENCY 42.56% DEVELOPMENT 6.50%
LEARNING
PILLARS

MANAGEMENT 14.03% 5.85% LEADERSHIP

SYSTEMS
 Abra Provincial
Capacity Pillar Overview

97% Competency

3% Management
Systems

0% Structure, Enabling

Policies, Knowledge
97%
and Learning, and
Leadership
 Apayao Provincial
Capacity Pillar Overview

13%
33% Structure
34%
12%
16% Management Systems

13% Enabling Policies

13% 13% Leadership

13% 13% Knowledge & Learning

16%
12% Competency
 Baguio City
Capacity Pillar Overview

8% 10% 34% Competency

11%
30% Management Systems

7% 11% Knowledge & Learning

34%
10% Structure

8% Leadership
30%
7% Enabling Policies
 Benguet Provincial
Capacity Pillar Overview

7%
7%
44% Structure
7%
22% Competency
44%
13% Management Systems
13%
7% Enabling Policies

7% Knowledge & Learning

22%
7% Leadership
 Ifugao Provincial
Capacity Pillar Overview

10% 64% Competency

25%
26% Structure

10% Management Systems

0% Enabling Policies

0% Knowledge & Learning

64%
0% Leadership
 Kalinga Provincial
Capacity Pillar Overview

45% Competency
28%
28% Structure
13%
13% Management Systems

5% Knowledge & Learning

5% Enabling Policies

45% 4% Leadership
 Mountain Province
Capacity Pillar Overview

19%
37% Structure
38%
19% Leadership
13%
19% Management Systems

13% Knowledge & Learning

6%
6% 6% Competency
19%
6% Enabling Policies
 Municipal & Component City
CapDev Analysis Results
46.28% Foundational CapDev
3000 Basic minimums required for LGUs to
implement the requisites of full
2500 devolution
2000
1500 47% Enabling CapDev
1000 Basic minimums required to provide a
conducive environment for local governance
500 and development
0
n a l
il n
g tal 6.70% Developmental CapDev
o b e n
ati n a m Basic minimums required to required to align
n d E o p
u e l LGU-specific development priorities with area-
Fo e v wide and/or provincial-regional development
D
 Municipal and Component City
CapDev Analysis Comparative Results
839

550 534 559 529

325 322
372
321
278 270
178
138 155
20 27
Abra Apayao Benguet Ifugao18 Kalinga
7
MP
52.16% 52.09% 54.94% 57.79% 75.13% 52.63%
Foundational Foundational Foundational Foundational Enabling Enabling Capdev
Capdev Capdev Capdev Capdev Capdev
 Abra Municipalities
Capacity Pillar Overview

6% 11%

16% 53% Competency

16% Knowledge &Learning

7% 11% Structure

7% 7%. Management Systems

53%
7% Enabling Policies

6% Leadership
 Abra CapDev Analysis
Comparative Results
Abra Province Abra Municipalities
53% Competency
97% Competency 6% 11%
16% Knowledge &Learning
3% Management
16%
Systems 11% Structure

0% Structure, Enabling 7% 7%. Management Systems

Policies, Knowledge 7% 7% Enabling Policies

97% and Learning, and 53%
Leadership 6% Leadership
 Apayao Municipalities
Capacity Pillar Overview

8%

13% 31% Structure

31%
21% Competency
9% 19% Management Systems

12% Knowledge & Learning

19% 9% Enabling Policies

21%

8% Leadership
 Apayao CapDev Analysis
Comparative Results
Apayao Province Apayao Municipalities
13% 33% Structure 8% 31% Structure

34% 16% Management 13% 31% 21% Competency

12% Systems
19% Management
13% Enabling Policies 9% Systems

13% 13% Leadership 12% Knowledge &

Learning
13% 13% Knowledge 19% 21%
16% &Learning 9% Enabling Policies

12% Competency 8% Leadership

 Benguet Municipalities
Capacity Pillar Overview

8%
10% 28% 28% Structure

21% Competency
14%
19% Management Systems

14% Enabling Policies

19% 21% 10% Knowledge & Learning

8% Leadership
 Benguet CapDev Analysis
Comparative Results
Benguet Province Benguet Municipalities
7% 8%
44% Structure 28% Structure
7% 10%
22% Competency
28%
21% Competency
7%
44% 13% Management Systems 19% Management Systems
14%
13% 7% Enabling Policies 14% Enabling Policies

7% Knowledge & Learning 10% Knowledge & Learning

7% Leadership 19% 21%

22% 8% Leadership
 Ifugao Municipalities
Capacity Pillar Overview

7%
11% 35% Structure
35%
23% Competency
11%
13% Management Systems

11% Enabling Policies

13%
11% Knowledge & Learning
23%
7% Leadership
 Ifugao CapDev Analysis
Comparative Results
Ifugao Province Ifugao Municipalities
10% 35% Structure
64% Competency 7%
25% 11% 23% Competency
26% Structure
35%
13% Management Systems
10% Management Systems 11%
11% Enabling Policies
0% Enabling Policies
13% 11% Knowledge & Learning
0% Knowledge & Learning

64% 23% 7% Leadership

0% Leadership
 Kalinga Municipalities and Component City
Capacity Pillar Overview

7%
10%
28% 28% Structure

24% Competency
12%
19% Management Systems

12% Enabling Policies

19% 25% 10% Knowledge & Learning

7% Leadership
 Kalinga CapDev Analysis
Comparative Results
Kalinga Municipalities &
Kalinga Province Component City
28% Structure
45% Competency 7%
28% 10%
28% Structure 28% 24% Competency

13% 19% Management Systems

13% Management Systems 12%
12% Enabling Policies
5% Knowledge & Learning
10% Knowledge & Learning
5% Enabling Policies
19% 25%
7% Leadership
4% Leadership
45%
 Mountain Province Municipalities Capacity
Pillar Overview

10%
24% 29% Competency
10%
24% Structure
10% 17% Management Systems

10% Enabling Policies

17% 29% 10% Knowledge & Learning

10% Leadership
 Mountain Province CapDev Analysis
Comparative Results
Mountain Province
Mountain Province Municipalities
10% 29% Competency
19% 37% Structure
24%
10% 24% Structure
19% Leadership
38%
17% Management Systems
19% Management Systems
13% 10% 10% Enabling Policies
13% Knowledge & Learning
10% Knowledge & Learning
6% 6% Competency
17% 29% 10% Leadership
6% 6% Enabling Policies
19%
 General Impressions
• The capacity development priorities of the component
LGUs (Municipalities/Component City) are generally
aligned with the capacity development priorities of the
province.
• The foundational and enabling capacity development
prioritized by LGUs imply the needed support to
operate in the context of full devolution.
 General Impressions

• Technical assistance shall be targeted to the LGUs with

foundational and enabling capacity development
needs for provincial, regional, and national integration.
• For LGUs with priorities within the developmental
capacity development, a determination of the area-
wide development with inter-LGU spillover.
 General Impressions

• Within the developmental capacity development

needs, an identification of the common priorities
based on their CapDev Agenda will be explored to
identify intra-provincial priorities and to leverage
strategic oversight by the Provincial Government of the
CapDev priorities of its component LGUs.
 General Impressions
• There is a need to review/revisit the entries in the
capacity development analysis to ensure that the
thematic capacity development needs of the LGUs are
captured.
• There are notable differences in terms of the
municipalities’ priorities in terms of the capacity
pillars with that of the province.
 General Impressions
• In terms of the capacity development pillars, engaging
with the key stakeholders is significant as it can
influence the attainment of specific outcomes.
• Delivery gaps must be complemented by specific
emphasis on the capacity development pillars
(structure, competency, etc).
 Ways Forward
• CapDevs categorized under the Foundational CapDev
will have to be strengthened to facilitate the LGUs in
their assumption of the devolved functions, services,
and facilities.
• Developmental CapDevs will have to be pursued
together with NGAs to enhance the alignment of
development directions.
 Ways Forward
• Revisit the LGU Devolution Transition Plans (DTPs)
• NGA involvement and technical assistance support to
LGUs through the CAR Committee on Devolution
(ComDev)
• MSAC engagement in the provision of technical
assistance/ capacity development intervention to
LGUs
Ways Forward
Thank you.