Values are deeply held beliefs that guide personal judgments of right and wrong. Morals emerge from values and are context-specific rules for behavior. Ethics enact a person's moral code through proper or improper actions. While morals and ethics are sometimes used interchangeably, morals refer more to religious/spiritual guidelines while ethics relate to professional codes. It is important to distinguish moral standards, which promote welfare, from non-moral standards like etiquette or fashion, to avoid imposing cultural values and prevent conflict. Finding common moral ground can help different cultures coexist peacefully.
Values are deeply held beliefs that guide personal judgments of right and wrong. Morals emerge from values and are context-specific rules for behavior. Ethics enact a person's moral code through proper or improper actions. While morals and ethics are sometimes used interchangeably, morals refer more to religious/spiritual guidelines while ethics relate to professional codes. It is important to distinguish moral standards, which promote welfare, from non-moral standards like etiquette or fashion, to avoid imposing cultural values and prevent conflict. Finding common moral ground can help different cultures coexist peacefully.
Values are deeply held beliefs that guide personal judgments of right and wrong. Morals emerge from values and are context-specific rules for behavior. Ethics enact a person's moral code through proper or improper actions. While morals and ethics are sometimes used interchangeably, morals refer more to religious/spiritual guidelines while ethics relate to professional codes. It is important to distinguish moral standards, which promote welfare, from non-moral standards like etiquette or fashion, to avoid imposing cultural values and prevent conflict. Finding common moral ground can help different cultures coexist peacefully.
The difference is slight but it's there. Values • Values are the foundation of a person's ability to judge between right and wrong. • Values include a deep-rooted system of beliefs. They have intrinsic worth, but are not universally accepted. This system allows each individual to determine what should and shouldn't be. What Is Important or Valuable? • For example, if someone'svalue system is founded upon honesty, they would probably make a proper judgment between cheating on a college entrance exam (wrong) and studying hard to ace a college entrance exam (right). What Is Important or Valuable? • Conversely, if someone valued achievement and success over honesty, that person may opt to cheat on the exam in order to achieve the desired result. This relates to which value is "worth more" to the individual. What Is Important or Valuable? •These fundamental beliefs are the barometer that go on to guide a person's decisions. Values don't necessarily need to be "system wide" in a group of people. Rather, they tend to be a personal, individual foundation that influences a particular person's behavior. Morals Next, we have morals, which are formed out of values. Morals • They're the actual system of beliefs that emerge out of a person's core values. • Morals are specific and context-driven rules that govern a person's behavior. • Because this system of beliefs is individually tailored to a person's life experience, it's subject to opinion. Amoral vs. Immoral Sometimes, the words "amoral" and "immoral" are interchanged. However, they're quite different. Amoral vs. Immoral If someone is amoral, they have no sense of right and wrong. They don't have the foundation that comes with a sound set of values. Meanwhile, if someone is immoral, you can be sure they know right from wrong. They're just choosing to do the wrong thing. A Moral Dilemma
Given the personal nature of morals,
someone might deem an action to be "good" even if it's breaking a law. A Moral Dilemma . For example, what if a daughter couldn't afford the life-saving medicine her dying mother needed but she, somehow, had access to the storeroom where the medicine was housed? In this instance, her core values might tell her stealing is wrong. However, her morality would tell her she needs to protect her mother. A Moral Dilemma . As such, the daughter might end up doing the wrong thing (stealing, as judged by her values) for the right reasons (saving her mother, as judged by her morals). Ethics Ethics are the vehicle to our morals. •Ethics enact the system we've developed in our moral code. As such, someone will behave ethically or unethically. •For example, someone's ethics will prevent them from taking action and telling a bold-faced lie or stealing their mother-in-law's secret recipe for cornbread. • Well, you're not alone. Encyclopedia Britannica considers "morals" and "ethics" to be interchangeable terms. However, the context in which they're used might provide further distinction. Professional Ethics We tend to link morals to matters of religion and spirituality. Meanwhile, ethics are closely linked to matters pertaining to medicine or law. We know doctors are held to a strict code of ethics when they swear the Hippocratic Oath. Similarly, an organization like PETA literally stands for "People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals." Consider morals as the rulebook and ethics as the motivator that leads to proper or improper action. Moral standards and Non-moral standards Morality may refer to the standards that a person or a group has about what is right and wrong, or good and evil. Accordingly, moral standards are those concerned with or relating to human behavior, especially the distinction between good and bad (or right and wrong) behavior. Moral standards Involve the rules people have about the kinds of actions they believe are morally right and wrong, as well as the values they place on the kinds of objects they believe are morally good and morally bad. Some ethicists equate moral standards with moral values and moral principles. Moral standards Moral standards are norms that individuals or groups have about the kinds of actions believed to be morally right or wrong, as well as the values placed on what we believed to be morally good or morally bad. Moral standards Moral standards normally promote “the good”, that is, the welfare and well-being of humans as well as animals and the environment. Moral standards, therefore, prescribe what humans ought to do in terms of rights and obligations. Non-moral standards refer to rules that are unrelated to moral or ethical considerations. Either these standards are not necessarily linked to morality or by nature lack ethical sense. Basic examples of non- moral standards include rules of etiquette, fashion standards, rules in games, and various house rules. Technically, religious rules, some traditions, and legal statutes (i.e. laws and ordinances) are non-moral principles, though they can be ethically relevant depending on some factors and contexts. Why the need to distinguish moral standards from non-moral ones? • It is important to note that different societies have different moral beliefs and that our beliefs are deeply influenced by our own culture and context. For this reason, some values do have moral implications, while others don’t. •Again, this clearly shows that different cultures have different moral standards. What is a matter of moral indifference, that is, a matter of taste (hence, non- moral value) in one culture may be a matter of moral significance in another. Now, the danger here is that one culture may impose its own cultural standard on others, which may result in a clash in cultural values and beliefs. When this happens, as we may already know, violence and crime may ensue, such as religious violence and ethnic cleansing.How can we address this cultural conundrum? • The point here is that if such standards are non-moral (that is, a matter of taste), then we don’t have the right to impose them on others. But if such standards are moral ones, such as not killing or harming people, then we may have the right to force others to act accordingly. In this way, we may be able to find a common moral ground, such as agreeing not to steal, lie, cheat, kill, harm, and deceive our fellow human beings.
(Philosophy and Medicine 82) Josef Seifert (Auth.) - The Philosophical Diseases of Medicine and Their Cure - Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, Vol. 1 - Foundations (2004, Springer Netherlands)