Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 4 (2022-2023)
Lecture 4 (2022-2023)
Lecture 4 (2022-2023)
Sound Structure
LET011P05
December 6, 2022
Last week
- Phonology vs. phonetics
- Phonological rules
This week’s goals
- After this week’s classes, you should be able to…
- Sonority hierarchy:
- p<b<f<v<m<l<r<j<i<a
- See also [- SONORANT] and [+ SONORANT]
syllable
s t r ɛ s
Syllable structure
syllable
rhyme
s t r ɛ s
Syllable structure
Rh
On Nu Co
s t r ɛ s
Syllable structure
σ σ
Rh Rh
On Nu Co On Nu Co
s ɪ n t æk s
Syllables
- Counting syllables ✅
- Syllable structure ✅
- Rules for syllables
- Syllable boundaries
Phonotactics
- Onset of an English syllable
- xa = /s/
- xb = plosive or fricative
- xc = nasal or approximant
- xa–c = all optional
On
xa xb xc
Phonotactics
- Rhyme of an English syllable
- x1 = mandatory
- x2 = in nucleus or coda
- x3-6 = optional
- x1-5 = decrease in sonority
- x6 = can be /s/ (so that’s an increase in sonority again)
Syllable template with phonotactics
Syllable template with phonotactics and features
Further restrictions
- The syllable template rules out some pronunciations in English
- xenon can’t be: */ksiːnən/ → /ziːnən/
- psychology can’t be: */psaɪkɑlədʒi/ → /saɪkɑlədʒi/
- These onsets are OK: /pl/ /bl/ /kl/ /ɡl/ /fl/ /sl/
/pr/ /br/ /tr/ /dr/ /kr/ /ɡr/ /θr/
/tw/ /dw/ /kw/ /ɡw/ /θw/ /sw/
Giegerich (1992)
Skeletal tier
- Why do we argue for a skeletal tier?
- So we can use the template and phonotactics
- It allows for generalizations about phonotactic characteristics
- It shows the integrity of the rhyme
- Very difficult without the skeletal tier
Tiers
Skeletal tier
- Why do we argue for a skeletal tier?
- So we can use the template and phonotactics
- It allows for generalizations about phonotactic characteristics
- It shows the integrity of the rhyme
- Very difficult without the skeletal tier
Rh
On Nu Co
x x1 x2 x3
m u n θ
Compensatory lengthening
σ
Rh
On Nu Co
x x1 x2 x3
m u n θ
Compensatory lengthening
σ
Rh
On Nu Co
x x1 x2 x3
m uː θ
Compensatory lengthening
- In very Early English, nasals disappeared before fricatives
- The result was that the preceding vowel became longer
- Other examples
- Loss of rhoticity: car /kɑr/ → /kɑː/
- Child language: Elmo /ɛl.moʊ/ → [ɛː.moʊ]
Compensatory lengthening
- In very Early English, nasals disappeared before fricatives
- The result was that the preceding vowel became longer
- Other examples
- Loss of rhoticity: car /kɑr/ → /kɑː/
- Child language: Elmo /ɛl.moʊ/ → [ɛː.moʊ]
Tiers
Skeletal tier (continued)
- Why do we argue for a skeletal tier?
- So we can use the template and phonotactics
- It allows for generalizations about phonotactic characteristics
- It shows the integrity of the rhyme
- Very difficult without the skeletal tier
sliː . pi sliːp . i
mə . riː . nə mər . iːn . ə
fə . niː . mɪk fən . iːm . ɪk
stæ . ndərd stæn . dərd stænd . ərd
Syllable boundaries
- We know the word sleepy /sliːpi/ has two syllables (because it has
two peaks in sonority)
- But where is the boundary between these two syllables?
- i.e., is the /p/ in coda 1, or in onset 2?
sliː . pi sliːp . i
mə . riː . nə mər . iːn . ə
fə . niː . mɪk fən . iːm . ɪk
stæ . ndərd stæn . dərd stænd . ərd
Syllable boundaries
- Maximal onset principle
- Put syllable boundaries to make maximal onsets
- But in accordance with phonotactics
- “Yes, it is.”
- /jɛs ɪt ɪz/ → /jɛ.sɪ.tɪz/ → [jɛ.sɪ.tʰɪz] — aspiration surfaces
- “Here it is.”
- [hɪə.ɹɪ.tʰɪz] — the /r/ resurfaces in non-rhotic varieties
- [lɔ.ɹə.nɔː.də] — …or appears out of nowhere
- [pʰɔː.lə.ɹən.daɪ]
- [kʰæ.nə.də.ɹən.də.mɛ.ɹɪ.kə]