Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Provision of Technical Assistance in Appraising The Enhanced School Improvement Plan
Provision of Technical Assistance in Appraising The Enhanced School Improvement Plan
https://www.mentimeter.com/s/9267cec331aeef2647cae3cb844a61a1/b962a86ea371
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP QUALITY IN
THE PHILIPPINES
• Set the direction of the school.
• Manage the systems and processes in
the school
• Promote quality teaching and
learning.
• Nurture themselves and others
• Engage stakeholders
DOMAIN 1: Leading Strategically
– Vision, mission and core values
– School planning and implementation
– Policy implementation and review
– Research and innovation
– Program design and implementation
– Learner voice
– Monitoring and evaluation processes and tools
Phase 3: Act - Objectives
6
Phase 3: Act
7
Step 9. Test the solutions
9
Step 9. Test the solutions
OUTPUT CHECK:
Data results from testing the solutions
Communication plan to concerned stakeholders
(Process Owners)
10
Phase 3: Act
11
Step 10: Roll out the Solutions
Process owners will
implement the solutions
OUTPUT CHECK:
Plan to roll out your solutions
Plan to gather feedback from concerned stakeholders
13
Phase 3: Act
14
DepEd Order 44, s. 2015, on monitoring
Step 11: Check Progress of AIP
17
Step 11. Check Progress of AIP
Project Monitoring Report Form
Scheduled Dates of Monitoring
Mid-year: ________________ Year-end: _________________
To be
---------To be filled-up by Project Team------- discussed by
SPT and
Project Team
19
Step 11. Check Progress of AIP
20
CHARACTERISTICS
Chapter 1
• Clarity and completeness of discussion on DepEd VMV
Chapter 2
• Clarity and completeness of discussion on School’s CURRENT SITUATION
• Alignment and Relevance of PRIORITY IMPROVEMENT AREAS (PIAs) to
Intermediate Outcomes (IOs)
• Responsiveness of the GENERAL OBJECTIVES to PIAs
• Feasibility of the TARGETS
• Clarity and completeness of the ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS (RCA) process
Chapter 3
• Appropriateness of the major activities in the identified SOLUTION(s)
• Comprehensiveness of the ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (AIP)
Chapter 4
• Completeness of the MONITORING PLAN
Needs discussion
Chapter II
The chapter
presents data in
textual form, but
fails to discuss
interventions to
address some
gaps.
School’s Current Situation
There is no quantitative
data, like what is the
value of 35.29%
• CoVID-19 Cases/Status
• Man-made and Natural Calamities
• Learning Resources
• etc
Identify / Review the Priority
Improvement Areas
5 – Very high
The urgency or need to improve the area 4 – High
Urgency as soon as possible.
3 – Moderate
2 – Low
The number of learners that will benefit
Magnitude when the improvement area is 1 – Very low
addressed.
• Low MPS
Common Drawbacks
General Objective
Verb Indicator
To increase the MPS in English from a
range of 49.88 to 53.96 to 75 in 3 years
Baseline Target Time Period
Develop Project Design(s)
38
Develop Project Design(s)
One project design
per solution
REMEMBER: Example: Meet with teachers to discuss the new process of checking
Periodical Test papers
These
definitions
when you fill- OUTPUT: The concrete, tangible products that result from
up Annex 9 undertaking an activity .
(Project Work
Plan & Budget Example: Teacher attendance during discussion of the new process on
Matrix) checking Periodical Test papers
39
Develop Project Design(s)
Each project will be monitored at least twice by the
SPT - middle and end of implementation period.
Monitoring dates should be stated in the Project
Work Plan & Budget Matrix (Annex 9)
40
Develop Project Design(s)
For School Heads, Teachers,
and Staff
Attach a copy of the project designs to the AIP so you can easily go back to it
when you review the implementation of your AIP.
41
Project Title: Tubig sa Pagkatuto
Problem Statement: Absence of potable water resulting to low NAT MPS
Project Objective Statement:
1. Installed potable water from zero to 20 or 100% of the classrooms in 3 years
2. Increased NAT MPS from 68.35 to 75 in 3 years
Root-Cause: Contaminated water
Activities Output Date of Persons Involved Budget Budget
Implementation Source
Environmental SWOT results January 2021 SH and Physical Facilities 100 MOOE
scanning/SWOT Analysis Coor. with SPT
Presentation of SWOT MOA/MOU February-March SH, PTA, partners 1000 MOOE
results to BLGU and 2021
stakeholders and
forging partnership
Installation of water Provision of potable April-May 2021 SH, PTA, partners 30,000 Donatio
connection (Phase 1) water to at least 10 ns, Fund
classrooms Raising
Criteria for School Projects
• Not necessary an acronym
• Must be catchy and has meaning (not negative)
• Should have a general theme
• Must not be an activity
• Existing DepEd Projects can be adopted
• Must address more than one Improvement Areas
Common Mistakes in Crafting
School Projects
1. PIA: Incomplete Fence
2. School Project: Fence Construction
3. One PAP is not one project
4. Root Cause is not directly addressed
5. Named after a person
6. Objective is not measurable; not quantifiable
7. Dangling/unclear root cause
Mr. Cruz together with the School Planning Team (SPT) considered a problem on
enrolment as reflected in the Planning Worksheet below. Examine the details to
answer the question.
How do you assess the identified Priority Improvement Area
(PIA)?
A. The PIA is correctly structured; intervention can easily be
crafted.
B. The PIA is brief, clear, and complete; it follows the logic.
C. The PIA is wrong; it could have been negatively stated.
D. The PIA is wrongly stated; it appears to be an activity.
Here is the result of the monitoring of Project Reading Enhancement in Addressing
Deficiency (READ) of XYZ Elementary School for CY 2021.