Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Divine Source Theory
The Divine Source Theory
• According to this hypothesis, language arose in rhythmic chants and vocalisms uttered by
people involved in communal labor. The first humans might have developed a set of
various grunts or calls that were uttered in a certain rhythmic order to provide a group
with instructions. Those „work songs“ would have to match the rhythm of the work that
had to be done, „yo-heave-ho“ for example could have been used when a group of humans
was trying to lift something up.
Drawbacks and criticism
A bow-bow theory is any of the theories by various scholars, including Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Johann
Gottfried Herder, on the origins of human language. Bow-wow theories suggest that the first human languages
developed as Onomatopoeia, imitations of natural sounds. The name “ bow-wow Theory” was coined by Max
Mller, a Philogist who was critical of the notion. The bow-wow theory of largely discredited as an account of
the origin of language, through some contemporary theories suggest that general imitative abilities may have
played an important role in the evoloution of language.
• This is also known as Imitation theory because this theory believe that primitive man was inspired to express
himself through speech b imitating cry of birds , the call of animals.
• Bow- wow – Sound of dog.
• Ka-Ka sound of crow.
• Critized by Ranon – He said man is different form animals and birds because he can think and arrguement.
• The idea that speech arose from people imitating the sounds that things make : Bow-Wow, Moo, Baa, Hiss,
Meow, Quack-Quack etc.
• In other words, the first human words were a type of index, a sign whose form is naturally connected with
the meaning in time and space.
Drawback of bow-wow theory