Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LSPU2023 Santoalla Week1c
LSPU2023 Santoalla Week1c
Public Administration
by:
JHON VINCE R. SANTOALLA
Master in Public Administration
Laguna State Polytechnic University
Sta. Cruz Laguna Campus
Pres e n tat i on O u t li n e
I.
The Function
of Politics vs.
III. the Function of II.
Concept of
Governance and
Administration Forms of
Administrative
its Key Elements Systems
Pres e n tat i on O u t li n e
II.
Forms of
Administrative
I.
The Function of
Systems III.
Concept of
Politics vs. the Governance and
Function of its Key Elements
Administration
Pres e n tat i on O u t li n e
III.
Concept of
Governance
II.
and its Key I.
The Function of
Forms of
Administrative
Elements Politics vs. the
Function of
Systems Administration
Pres e n tat i on O u t li n e
I.
The Function
of Politics vs.
III. the Function of II.
Concept of
Governance and
Administration Forms of
Administrative
its Key Elements Systems
I. The Function of Politics vs. the Function of Administration
POLITICS ADMINISTRATION
The Function of Politics vs. the Function of Administration
2. Oversight: Congress has the power to investigate and oversee the actions
of the executive branch of government. This includes the power to hold
hearings, summon witnesses, and gather information to ensure that the
government is acting in the best interests of the people.
The Function of Politics vs. the Function of Administration
POLITICS ADMINISTRATION
The Function of Politics vs. the Function of Administration
POLITICS ADMINISTRATION
The relationship between politics and administration is inherently complex
because elected officials—politicians—create laws through the legislative
process. Administrative officials—serving in the agencies of government—are
tasked with implementing the policies made by elected officials.
Both groups share in responsibility for enacting laws, but they also have
distinct considerations that govern their behavior.
Scholars have varied in their beliefs about the extent to which politics should
be (or is) involved in public administration. As Demir and Nyhan (2008)
describe, there are three approaches to the relationship between politics
and public administration.
The Function of Politics vs. the Function of Administration
Early Scholars Believed in Separation
Early public administration scholars, such as Woodrow Wilson, believed that there
should be a firm separation between politics and public administration.
The separation scholars tend to view the governmental realm as divided into two zones,
that is, politics and administration. They take a functional approach to analyze the
relationship between politics and administration. The function of politics is to provide
guidance, or what Wilson (1887) said, “setting the task for administration.” The function
of public administration, on the other hand, is to provide neutral competence to the
policy process.
POLITICS ADMINISTRATION
The Function of Politics vs. the Function of Administration
POLITICS ADMINISTRATION
The Function of Politics vs. the Function of Administration
A Third Approach Sees the Two as Interactive
As Demir and Nyhan (2008) describe, a third approach to the relationship between politics and
administration argues that the two are inherently interactive due to the shared nature of their job
responsibilities, but that the administration should still be responsive to elected officials.
These scholars acknowledge the differences between politics and administration in a number of ways
such as logical and psychological differences between politics and administration, or dissimilarities in the
perspectives, values, and formal positions of elected and administrative officials (Waldo, 1980;
Nalbandian, 1994, Svara, 2001). Yet, what makes the third approach somewhat different from the
separation is its emphasis on ongoing cooperation between elected and administrative officials in the
process of policy making. Furthermore, the interaction school seeks an expansion of the value set of
public administration.
POLITICS ADMINISTRATION
The Function of Politics vs. the Function of Administration
COMPARISON TABLE
Definition The activities such as discussion, The body that is responsible for the
expression and policy drafting for implementation of the drafted
the governance and allocation of policies is known as
resources are collectively called administration.
politics.
Nature - Conflict It is a desired trait for better In administration, as much as
functioning. possible, conflict must be
eliminated to achieve common
goals
The Function of Politics vs. the Function of Administration
COMPARISON TABLE
Relevant body The legislative is responsible for The executive is responsible for
the formation of political policies the implementation of these
policies.
The Government of the Philippines has three interdependent and co-equal branches: the
LEGISLATIVE, EXECUTIVE, and JUDICIARY branches. The Philippines is governed as a
unitary state under a presidential representative and democratic constitutional republic in
which the president functions as both the head of state and the head of government of the
country within a pluriform multi-party system.
II. Forms of Administrative Systems
THE PHILIPPINE ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM (PAS)
FUNCTION OFFICES/INSTITUTIONS
1. Executive Responsible for implementing laws and policies and Office of the President
managing the day-to-day operations of government Office of the Vice President
agencies. Cabinet Secretaries
2. Legislative Responsible for making laws, appropriating funds for Senate of the Philippines
government programs and services, and overseeing the House of Representatives
Executive Branch.
3. Judiciary Responsible for interpreting the law and settling legal Supreme Court
disputes. Court of Appeals
Sandiganbayan
II. Forms of Administrative Systems
THE PHILIPPINE ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM (PAS)
FUNCTION OFFICES/INSTITUTIONS
4. Local The Executive Branch extends beyond the National Provincial Government
Government Units Government. According to Article X, Section 4 of City Government
the constitution, the President of the Philippines is Municipal Government
mandated to supervise local governments all over the
country. However, because of Republic Act No.
7160, otherwise known as the Local Government
Code of 1991, local governments enjoy relative
autonomy from the national government.
GOVERNANCE
“the manner in which power is exercised in “The exercise of economic, political, and
the management of a country’s social and administrative authority to manage a country’s
economic resources for development. It is affairs at all levels. It comprises mechanisms,
referred to as the quality of the institutions processes, and institutions through which
to make, implement and enforce sound citizens and groups articulate their interests,
policies in an efficient, effective, equitable exercise their legal rights, meet their
and inclusive.” obligations, and mediate their differences.”
III. Concept of Governance and its Key Elements
GOVERNANCE
The state, private sector, and civil society are interdependent and play complementary
roles in shaping the economic, social, and political landscape of a society.
In a well-functioning society, these key players should work together to address the needs
and aspirations of citizens, create economic opportunities, support social and
environmental sustainability, and promote GOOD GOVERNANCE.
III. Concept of Governance and its Key Elements
GOOD GOVERNANCE
Good Governance is, among other things, participatory, transparent and accountable. It is
also effective and equitable and promotes the rule of law. It ensures that political, social and
economic priorities are based on broad consensus in society and that the voices of the
poorest and the most vulnerable are heard in decision-making over the allocation of
development resources.
It guarantees that public resources are used efficiently and effectively, corruption is
minimized, and the needs and aspirations of citizens are addressed. It also helps to build
trust in the government and institutions, promoting stability and encouraging economic
growth and development.
III. Concept of Governance and its Key Elements
CONSENSUS
ORIENTED
GOOD GOVERNANCE
Good governance is important because it ensures the efficient and effective
management of a country or organization. It leads to transparent and
accountable decision-making, protection of human rights, and provision of
basic services to citizens.
- Jesse Robredo
Philippines Exemplary Fiscal Management Award by the DILG, 1989
Dangal ng Bayan Award by the Civil Service Commission, 1990
The Outstanding Young Men of the Philippines, 1991
Ten Outstanding Young Persons of the World, 1996
Konrad Adenauer Medal of Excellence, 1996
Ramon Magsaysay Award for Government Service, 2000
Presidential Lingkod Bayan Award (posthumous) by the Civil Service Commission, 2012
References:
1. Kuno S. and A. Eicher (2013). Public Management - Relations between administration and politics
2. Demir, Tansu, and Ronald C. Nyhan. 2008. “The Politics–Administration Dichotomy: An Empirical Search for Correspondence
between Theory and Practice.” Public Administration Review 68, no. 1: 81-96.
5. United Nations Development Programme 1997a Reconceptualizing Governance. Discussion Paper 2. New York: Management
Development and Governance Division, Bureau of Policy and Programme Support, UNDP, January.
6. Ma. Oliva Z. Domingo, Third Sector Governance: Meanings, Issues, and Challenges in the Philippines, National College of Public
Administration and Governance, University of the Philippines
7. https://www.jeywin.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Optional-Public-Administration-6-Administrative-Systems.pdf
8. https://www.academia.edu/31510391/Philippine_Administrative_System_A_fusion_of_East_and_West
9. https://lemp.io/what-is-philippine-administrative-system/#0