This document provides an overview of contrastive analysis (CA). It defines CA as an approach that involves comparing two or more languages to determine their differences and similarities. CA can be done between languages (cross-linguistic) or within one language (intra-lingual). The document outlines some key areas of language that can be analyzed contrastively, such as phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, and translation. It also discusses the major objectives of CA according to Lado in 1957, which are to provide insights into language similarities and differences, explain and predict second language learning problems, and develop language teaching materials. Finally, it touches on the psychological basis of CA in habit formation and the linguistic basis in structuralism.
This document provides an overview of contrastive analysis (CA). It defines CA as an approach that involves comparing two or more languages to determine their differences and similarities. CA can be done between languages (cross-linguistic) or within one language (intra-lingual). The document outlines some key areas of language that can be analyzed contrastively, such as phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, and translation. It also discusses the major objectives of CA according to Lado in 1957, which are to provide insights into language similarities and differences, explain and predict second language learning problems, and develop language teaching materials. Finally, it touches on the psychological basis of CA in habit formation and the linguistic basis in structuralism.
This document provides an overview of contrastive analysis (CA). It defines CA as an approach that involves comparing two or more languages to determine their differences and similarities. CA can be done between languages (cross-linguistic) or within one language (intra-lingual). The document outlines some key areas of language that can be analyzed contrastively, such as phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, and translation. It also discusses the major objectives of CA according to Lado in 1957, which are to provide insights into language similarities and differences, explain and predict second language learning problems, and develop language teaching materials. Finally, it touches on the psychological basis of CA in habit formation and the linguistic basis in structuralism.
Centre of Continuing Education University of Da Nang Unit 1 WHAT IS CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS? CA is: - an inductive investigative approach based on distinctive elements in a language - involves comparison of two (or more) languages or subsystems of languages (Cross-linguistic CA) - to determine both the differences and similarities between them - It could also be done within one language (Intra- linguistic CA) Intra-lingual: - Analysis of contrastive phonemes, e.g. /p/ & /b/ - Feature analysis of morphosyntactic categories E.g. forms of verbals as Subject, Objects, Complement - Analysis of morphemes having grammatical meaning, e.g. morphemes marking number, tense … - Analysis of word order, e.g. OSV, SVO … - Analysis of lexical relations E.g. synonymy, antonymy, hyponymy - Componential analysis of lexemes, e.g.
Contrastive Time of Mode of Work nature
features payment payment
Salary [+paid [+ by cheque] [+manual/
monthly] clerical work] Wage [+paid weekly] [+in cash] [+with expertise/skill] Cross-linguistic CA - Comparative analysis of contrastive phonemes E.g. /p/ in English vs. Vietnamese - Comparative analysis of morphosyntactic systems E.g. Adjectives in English vs. Vietnamese - Comparative analysis of lexical semantics E.g. causative verbs in English vs. Vietnamese - Analysis of translational equivalence - Study of interference in foreign language learning E.g. How OSV order in Vietnamese may influence transfers into English Pedagogic view: Structuralism: - a finite structure of a given language that can be documented & compared with another language - structural linguists set about to identify the patterns of language - structural linguistic patterns: the set of habits that characterized a given language Behaviourism: - language learning: habit formation - reinforced or impeded by existing habits + Errors: as result of interference in transfer L1 to L2 + Habits of MT differ from those of TL + Structure of TL differs from that of MT Lado (1957): major objectives of CA are: 1. Providing insights into similarities and differences between languages; 2. Explaining and predicting problems in second language learning; and 3. Developing course material for language teaching Theoretical CA & Applied CA CA is theoretical - the establishment of linguistic universals, and - look for the realization of a universal category X in both A and B (bilateral CA) - not investigate how a given category present in language A is presented in language B (unilateral) Applied CA attempted to • selecting information pertinent for the purpose (teaching, studies on bilingualism, translation, etc.) • unidirectional, investigating how a (universal) category realised in L1 in one way is rendered in L2 • identifying potential areas of difficulty due to interference • emphasizing value of pointing out similarities in language teaching • preventing learner from attempting to construct forms which may ‘sound foreign’ (Fisiak 1981:3). Questions: 1. State the major objectives of contrastive analysis suggested by Lado (1957) 2. In what areas of language can CA make prediction? Provide example. 3. State briefly the psychological base for CA? (Clue: habit formation) 4. State briefly the linguistic base for CA? (Clue: structuralism) 5. What are the purposes of Cross-linguistic CA? End of Unit 1