Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NON-MUSLIM MARRIAGES (Latest)
NON-MUSLIM MARRIAGES (Latest)
MARRIAGES
(FORMATION OF
MARRIAGES)
Sec 3(4) : LRA shall not apply to any native/ aborigines whose
marriage and divorce is governed by native/ aborigines customary
law unless
1.He elects to marry under this Act
2.Marry under Christian Marriage Ordinance (Sabah)
3.Marry under Civil Marriage Ordinance (Sarawak)
However, if the Sabahan/ Sarawakian choose not to marry under
LRA or under those 2 ordinances, LRA is not applicable to them –
had a choice whether to subject to LRA or not
Art. 161A(6) of FC defines ‘native’
P sought a declaration that she was the legal wife of D and that the
native customary marriage entered into between them on 24/6/1990
was valid and subsisting in law.
P was a Kadazan Tatana and a native of Sabah whilst D was born
of Chinese parents. On 5/5/1990. P and D underwent a tea
ceremony held to celebrate the marriage between them according
to Chinese custom. Relatives from both sides attended and
coloured photographs were taken of those who attended.
P and D cohabited as wife and husband. On 24.6.1990, they
underwent another celebration of their marriage according to the
customs of the Kadazan Tatana at P’s father’s residence. During
this native marriage ceremony, P and D served rice wine to the
native chief of Kuala Penyu, and all the elders. P and D continued
to cohabit until they encountered problems in their marriage. The
marriage was not registered under LRA.
Cont..
Held: section 5(3) and (4) of LRA must be read together.
Although section 5(3) allows marriages under any law,
customs or usage after the appointed date, that marriage must
be solemnised as provided for under Part III of LRA.
The fact that the D was not a native was not material because
once he had married a native and observed the rites and
customs of P, he should not be allowed to retract.
Besides, the native court has jurisdiction even if one party to a
marriage is a non-native (Native Courts Ordinance & Native
Courts Enactment 1992). Therefore the marriage between P
and D according to the Kadazan Tatana custom should be
recognised as valid.
Since the native customary marriage was solemnised in
accordance with native customary law, it is valid according to
section 3(4) and therefore LRA does not apply to such a
marriage. The marriage is governed by native customary law.
Prior the coming into force of Law Reform (Marriages and
Divorce) Act 1976 (“LRA”)
There was a variety of family law in Malaysia which results in some
inter-personal conflicts
(2) Such marriage, if valid under the law, religion, custom or usage under which
it was solemnized, shall be deemed to be registered under this Act.
(3) Every such marriage, unless void under the law, religion, custom or usage
under which it was solemnized, shall continue until dissolved-
1. S.3 (3):
Substantive Requirements under LRA
1. Absolute restriction:-
a. Gender of parties: S69(d); it must be between male and female
S10 of LRA
Female & Male must be 18 years.
Female who completed 16 years may marry with a
licence issued by the Menteri Besar or Chief
Minister or in the Federal Territory by the Minister
charged with responsibility for the registration of
marriage.
Consent
Section 12(1)-(6) LRA
Consent of parents or guardian in writing:-
Father, mother (illegitimate/ if father dead),
adopter father @ mother or person standing in
loco parents
Court can also give consent if person required refused to
do so.
Application made in High Court in chambers
If minor remarry, no consent required
If x consent obtained, offence under section 41(3) LRA
Marriage Solemnization
5 ways: