Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 18 views

    Objective 1: Changing The Cross Section of Plane Ice Stub Columns

    Uploaded by

    Rithin Tom
    The document discusses analyzing the load carrying capacity of different cross-sectional shapes for plane ice stub columns, including hexagon, L-shape, T-shape, and pentagon, with the same overall area of around 20,000 mm^2. It finds that the L-shaped ice specimen has the highest load carrying capacity, around 49.85% higher than the T-shaped specimen, while all the shapes show almost the same deformation. Modeling, meshing, loading conditions, deformation, and load-deformation curves are examined to analyze and compare the different shaped specimens.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Objective 1: Changing The Cross Section of Plane Ice Stub Columns

    Uploaded by

    Rithin Tom
    18 views7 pages
    The document discusses analyzing the load carrying capacity of different cross-sectional shapes for plane ice stub columns, including hexagon, L-shape, T-shape, and pentagon, with the same overall area of around 20,000 mm^2. It finds that the L-shaped ice specimen has the highest load carrying capacity, around 49.85% higher than the T-shaped specimen, while all the shapes show almost the same deformation. Modeling, meshing, loading conditions, deformation, and load-deformation curves are examined to analyze and compare the different shaped specimens.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    ppt 2

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document discusses analyzing the load carrying capacity of different cross-sectional shapes for plane ice stub columns, including hexagon, L-shape, T-shape, and pentagon, with the same overall area of around 20,000 mm^2. It finds that the L-shaped ice specimen has the highest load carrying capacity, around 49.85% higher than the T-shaped specimen, while all the shapes show almost the same deformation. Modeling, meshing, loading conditions, deformation, and load-deformation curves are examined to analyze and compare the different shaped specimens.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    18 views7 pages

    Objective 1: Changing The Cross Section of Plane Ice Stub Columns

    Uploaded by

    Rithin Tom
    The document discusses analyzing the load carrying capacity of different cross-sectional shapes for plane ice stub columns, including hexagon, L-shape, T-shape, and pentagon, with the same overall area of around 20,000 mm^2. It finds that the L-shaped ice specimen has the highest load carrying capacity, around 49.85% higher than the T-shaped specimen, while all the shapes show almost the same deformation. Modeling, meshing, loading conditions, deformation, and load-deformation curves are examined to analyze and compare the different shaped specimens.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 7

    OBJECTIVE 1: CHANGING THE CROSS SECTION

    OF PLANE ICE STUB COLUMNS


    Four shapes will selected for the analysis.
    MATERIAL PROPERTY
    Area of all the models will be same.
    Area kept almost equal to 20000mm2 Ice Young’s modulus, E = 9100 MPa

    Shape of specimen Size of specimen(mm) Poisson’s ratio, µ = 0.33


    Hexagon Edge width = 94
    L shape ( 210 × 54 ) & ( 210 × 54 ) Shear modulus = 3421 MPa

    T shape ( 210 × 54 ) & ( 210 × 54 )


    Pentagon Edge width = 115
    MODELLING
    MESHING
    LOADING AND SUPPORT CONDITION
    DEFORMATION
    LOAD DEFORMATION CURVE
    CONCLUSIONS
    The l shaped ice specimen has more load carrying capacity than other shapes.
    The l shaped specimen shows 49.85%more load carrying capacity than t shaped ice column.
    All shapes shows almost same deformation.

    You might also like