This document discusses various methods for collecting primary data, including observation, interviews, questionnaires, schedules, and case studies. It describes the types of questions that can be asked, advantages and disadvantages of different data collection methods, essential elements of a good questionnaire, and factors to consider when selecting an appropriate data collection method for a research study.
This document discusses various methods for collecting primary data, including observation, interviews, questionnaires, schedules, and case studies. It describes the types of questions that can be asked, advantages and disadvantages of different data collection methods, essential elements of a good questionnaire, and factors to consider when selecting an appropriate data collection method for a research study.
This document discusses various methods for collecting primary data, including observation, interviews, questionnaires, schedules, and case studies. It describes the types of questions that can be asked, advantages and disadvantages of different data collection methods, essential elements of a good questionnaire, and factors to consider when selecting an appropriate data collection method for a research study.
Demographic and Socio-economic Characteristics ◦ Attitudes and Opinions ◦ Awareness and Knowledge-Unaided recall, Aided recall and Recognition ◦ Intentions ◦ Motivation ◦ Behaviour Demographic Variables Age Sex Income Education Occupation Social Class Religion Race Nationality Basic means of obtaining Primary Data Communication and observation are two basic means of obtaining primary data Methods of communication are classified by their degree of structure, their degree of disguise and by the method of contact Structured disguised questionnaires Structured undisguised questionnaires Unstructured undisguised questionnaires Unstructured-disguised questionnaires Projective Methods used in unstructured disguised questionnaires Word Association Sentence completion Story telling Methods of Data Collection Observation Method Structured Observation Participant observation Disguised observation Controlled and uncontrolled observation Interview Method Personal Interviews ◦ Structured Interviews ◦ Unstructured Interviews ◦ Focussed Interview ◦ Clinical Interview ◦ Non-directive interview Merits of Interview techniques More information and in greater depth can be obtained Interviewer can overcome the resistance Greater flexibility Observation method can also be applied Personal information can be easily obtained Samples can be controlled more effectively Interviewer has better control over respondents Interviewer may catch the informant off-guard Language of the interviewer can be adopted to the ability of the respondents Collection of supplementary information possible Weaknesses of the interview method Very expensive method Possibility of bias Some respondents may not be easily approachable Relatively more time consuming Over-stimulation of the respondent Training of the field-staff is more complex Systematic errors Effectiveness of interview may be difficult to obtain Pre-requisites and basic tenets of interviewing Interviewers should be carefully selected, trained and briefed They should be honest, sincere, hardworking, impartial and must possess ;the technical competence and practical experience Occasional field checks Provision to take appropriate action Every effort to create friendly atmosphere to trust and confidence Ask questions properly, intelligently and must record the responses accurately and completely Answer legitimate questions asked by the respondent Interviewer must be friendly, courteous, conversational and unbiased No expression of feelings in front of respondent Discourage irrelevant conversation Take possible effort to keep the respondent on the track Telephone Interviews It is more flexible compared to mailing method Faster than other methods Cheaper than personal interviewing method Recall is easy Higher rate of response Replies can be recorded Interviewer can explain requirements more easily Access to inaccessible persons No field staff is required Representative and wider distribution of sample is possible Demerits of Telephone Interview Method Little time is given to respondents for considered answers Restricted only to those having telephone facilities Restricted by cost considerations Not suitable for intensive surveys Possibility of bias of the interviewer is more Questions have to be short and to the point Collection of data through questionnaires There is low cost It is free from the bias of the interviewer Respondents have adequate time to give well thought out answers Respondents who are not easily approachable can be reached Large samples can be made use of and results can be made more dependable and reliable Demerits of mail questionnaire method Low rate of return Only for educated and cooperative respondents Control over questionnaire is lost once it is sent There is inbuilt inflexibility Possibility of ambiguous replies or omission of replies altogether It is difficult to know whether willing respondents are truly representative Slowest of all methods Advisable to conduct pilot study Main aspects of a questionnaire General form Question sequence ◦ Questions that put too great a strain on the memory or intellect of the respondents ◦ Questions of a personal character ◦ Questions related to personal wealth etc.
Question formation and wording
Essentials of a good questionnaire Comparatively short and simple Logical sequence Personal and intimate questions should be left ot the end Technical terms and vague expressions capable of different interpretations should be avoided Dichotomous, multiple choice or open ended questions can be used Avoid open ended questions as they are difficult to evaluate Control questions in the questionnaire Questions affecting the sentiments of the respondents should be avoided Adequate space for answers should be provided There should be provision for indication of uncertainity Physical appearance of the questionnaire affects the cooperation the researcher receives The quality of the paper should be good Collection of data through schedules Schedules are filled by enumerators who are specially appointed for the purpose Recording of the responses also possible Enurmerators explain the the aims and objects of investigation Selection of enumerators for filling up schedules Trained to perform their job well Enumerators should be intelligent and must possess the cross examination capacity Very useful in extensive enquiries Leads to fairly reliable results Very expensive Difference between questionnaires and schedules 1.Questionnaire is sent through mail to informants Schedule is filled out by the research worker 2. Collecting data through questionnaire is relatively cheap and economical . Collecting data through enumerators is more expensive 3. Non –response is usually high in case of questionnaire But it is low in schedules 4. In questionnaires, there is no clarity about who replies but in schedule the identity of the respondent is known 5. Questionnaire method is likely to be very slow but schedules collect information faster 6. Personal contact is generally not possible in questionnaire method but in schedules direct personal contact is established with respondents 7.Questionnaire method can be used with literate and cooperative respondents but schedules apply to all 8. Wider and more representative distribution of sample is possible in questionnaire method but in schedules difficulty in sending enumerators over a relatively wider area 9.Risk of collecting incomplete and wrong information is relatively more under the questionnaire method but in schedules, the information collected is generally complete and accurate 10. The success of questionnaire depends on the quality of the questionnaire itself, but in schedules it depends on honesty and competence of enumerators 11,Physica appearance of questionnaire must be attractive but this does not apply to schedules 12.Along with schedules observation method can also be used but in mail questionnaires such data collection is not possible Other methods of data collection Warranty cards Distribution or store audits Pantry audits Consumer panels Use of Mechanical devices – eye cameral, pupilometric camera, psychogalvanometer, motion picture camera , audiometer Projective techniques- word association tests, sentence completion tests, story completion tests verbal projective tests pictorial techniques , Play techniques , quizzes, tests and examinations Depth interviews Content analysis Pictorial techniques Thematic Apperception test Rosenzweig test Rorschach test Holtzman Inkblot test Tomkins-Horn Picture arrangement test Collection of Secondary Data They must have following characteristics Reliability of data Suitability of data Adequacy of data Selection of an appropriate method of data collection Nature ,scope and subject of enquiry Availability of funds Time Factor Precision required Case Study method Popular form of qualitative analysis Careful and complete observation of a social unit Full analysis of a limited number of events or conditions and their interrelationships Deals with the processes that take place and their interrelationship. It is an intensive investigation of the particular unit under consideration Object of the method is to locate the factors that account fo the behavior patterns of the given unit as an integrated totality It is a technique by which individual factor whether it be an institution or is an episode in the life of an individual or a group is analysed in the relationship in any other in the group. Characteristics of Case Study Method Researcher can take one single social unit or more of such units Selected unit is studied intensively Tries to understand the complexity of factors Qualitative approach An effort is made to know the mutual inter-relationship of causal factors Results in fruitful hypothesis Assumptions of Case study method •The assumption of uniformity •The assumption of studying the natural history •The assumption of comprehensive study of the unit Major Phases Involved Recognition and determination of the status of the phenomenon Collection of data , examination and history of the given phenomenon Diagnosis and identification of causal factors Application of remedial measures Follow up Programme to determine effectiveness of the treatment applied Advantages of Case study method Enables the study of behavior pattern of the concerned unit Real and enlightened record of personal experiences Natural history of the social unit Helps in forming relevant hypotheses along with the data Facilitates intensive study of social units Helps in constructing questionnaire Researcher can use one or more research methods Proves beneficial in the nature of units to be studied Understand the past of a social unit Perfect type of sociological method Enhances the experience of the researcher Makes possible the study of social changes Indispensable for therapeutic and administrative purposes Limitations of case study method Case studies are seldom comparable It is not considered as significant scientific data Danger of false generalization is always there It consumes more time and requires lot of expenditure Most of the time case data are vitiated It is based on several assumptions which may not be realistic It may be used in a limited sphere Response of the investigator is an important limitation of the case study method