The document discusses the role of the state in development. It argues that the state should be a supporter, not a central controller, of development by empowering communities and decentralizing decision making. The state's role includes making development policies, implementing programs, and providing resources and infrastructure to support locally-initiated development. However, many third world states lack the capacity and democratic processes to fulfill this role effectively.
The document discusses the role of the state in development. It argues that the state should be a supporter, not a central controller, of development by empowering communities and decentralizing decision making. The state's role includes making development policies, implementing programs, and providing resources and infrastructure to support locally-initiated development. However, many third world states lack the capacity and democratic processes to fulfill this role effectively.
The document discusses the role of the state in development. It argues that the state should be a supporter, not a central controller, of development by empowering communities and decentralizing decision making. The state's role includes making development policies, implementing programs, and providing resources and infrastructure to support locally-initiated development. However, many third world states lack the capacity and democratic processes to fulfill this role effectively.
about the human beings making use of infrastructure. • When the state overplays its role, it harms the development of human beings by not allowing the people to make decisions. • This also happens by centralised control. 1. Commitment to Development National policy – statements of guidance adopted by the government at the national level in pursuit of national policies. 3 NB INPUTS i) National policy support – means that a governments’ total approach must be focused on economic, social, and technical which are the aims of development. ii) Administrative support – we need committed policy- makers and also a committed bureaucracy – such commitment must favour and be directed toward development. iii) National planning and programming – The core function of the bureaucracy is central planning and programming. • The success of programmes depends on national policy and administrative support. • National planning must indicate a centralised direction and national policy objectives • National planning operates from the top downwards and allocates resources. • Planning from the bottom upwards is essential. 2. The State as a Policy Maker • Policy making is the role of the state. • Development policy is the “goal statement addressing the known problems and opportunities associated with a policy area.” • This process is not linear – it does not start at one point and end at another. • Policy process is cyclical, representing a continuous spiral. The State as a Policy Maker cont’d Common Phases of Policy Process 1. Policy initiation – placing items on the agenda. 2. Policy process design - planning and designing. 3. Policy analysis - measuring the outcome. 4. Policy formulation - purposeful representation & formulation of policy. 5. Policy decision - taking formal decisions. 6. Policy dialogue - government engages in discussions with other stakeholders. 7. Policy implementation - practical is being tested. 8. Policy monitoring and evaluation - measure the degree of success and point to new directions for the future. The State as a Policy Maker cont’d • A development policy needs to deal with the development of both urban and rural regions. • It deals with specific urban and rural areas with their specific and unique development problems. • The colonial history has a direct link to the political, social and economic environment with which 3rd world government must deal with. • Even geographical or natural environment was influenced by this colonial legacy. The State as a Policy Maker cont’d • Policy-making must reflect the needs and opinions of the people. • There are few participants in the policy-making process. • Channels for participation are not well established. • Policy choices by the government are not well informed- communication channels are not clear. • Policy reform initiative may be altered or reversed at any stage in its life cycle. 3. The State as Policy Implementer • Policy can be implemented if capacity exists e.g. finance, managerial and technical resources. • Most of these are absent in Third World countries. • There is a gap between policy formulation and policy implementation. • Third World governments are huge but weak and ineffective. • They have acted in the interests of the small political, economic and administrative elite. • Wishes of the rural areas were either unknown or simply disregarded. • The history of the Third World bureaucracies are influenced by western thoughts and theories. The State as Policy Implementer
• Executives in developing countries are
incapable of delegating authority, they want to control everything. Even the simplest administrative decisions has to be approved at the top (McCurdy, 1977:300) 4. The State as a Benefactor • In Third World countries the state is regarded as a benefactor, infrastructure is lacking and government needs to provide it. • This is a narrow and self-defeating way of looking at the role of the state. • The state does not have the capacity to play the role of benefactor successfully. • The state is looked upon as the only saviour. • The state formulate policies that are broad, ambitious and often unrealistic. 4. The State as a Benefactor cont’d • Every Third World country is part of the international economic order e.g. funding for development. 5. The State as Development Supporter • If the state is the supporter of the development, there must be an initiator or manager of that development. • This role should be fulfilled by the people themselves. • It means development should be localised. • Local people take responsibility for the development, make decisions and plan. • The government supports their initiative by providing expertise, finance, infrastructure. CONCLUSION • State plays an important role in development. • Their position and capacity have not allowed them to play this part successfully. • To resolve this, they need to re-evaluate the role of the state in the whole policy process. • Participatory development is not the only problem. • It is important that ordinary people should be empowered to play their role fully in their own development. • Government has a very important task in this regard.