DENR EMB-NCR

Marikina City
Marikina city
operation of centralized materials recovery
facility
To operate an effective recovery and
recycling process in order to optimize waste
reduction.
To generate additional income for the City of
Marikina from the sale of the recyclable
materials to partly recover the operational
costs of the Solid Waste Management
Program.
 MARIKINA CITY
OPERATION OF
CENTRALIZED MATERIALS
RECOVERY FACILITY
BUILDING A SAFE ENVIRONMENT
THROUGH PROPER WASTE
MANAGEMENT
 Map of Metro
Manila

MARIKINA CITY
• One of the seventeen (17)
LGUs comprising Metro
Manila
• Type: Highly urbanized city
• Land Area: 23.14 km2
• Population (2020): 456,059
• Density (2020): 21,192/km2

(54,881/sq.mi)
• No. of Barangays: 16
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

COLLECTION
*COLLECTED BY CITY
GENERATION *DOOR TO DOOR
• HOUSEHOLD *SEPARATE DAY
• COMMERCIAL COLLECTION OF
DIFFERENT TYPE OF PROCESSING & TRANSPORT
• INSTITUTIONAL WASTE MATERIALS RECOVERY
• INDUSTRIES FACILITY & GARBAGE
• MARKET TRANSFER STATION
• STREET SWEEPING
• VACANT LOT
CLEANUP
DISPOSAL
• WATERWAYS GARBAGE TRANSFER
NEW SAN MATEO SANITARY STATION
CLEANUP LANDFIILL

5
RATIONALE
Requirements for the LGUs pursuant to Section 10 of R.A.9003:

The LGUs as primary responsible for the implementation

and enforcement of solid waste management in their
locality
OBJECTIVES

To operate an effective recovery and recycling

process in order to optimize waste reduction.
OBJECTIVES

To generate additional income for the City of

Marikina from the sale of the recyclable materials
to partly recover the operational costs of the Solid
Waste Management Program.
CORRESPONDING STRATEGIES
 The city government and ISWIMS initiated the
conceptualization
 Determined the source of solid waste
 Construction by Administration
 Inaugurated with the presence of various
stakeholders
 Leased of Facility
CENTRALIZED MRF FOR DRY
 Dry run: October & November 2011
 Date Started: December 1, 2011
 Inaugurated: January 13, 2012
 Input Material: Municipal solid wastes
 Materials Recovered: Recyclables
DESCRIPTION
 Capacity: 600
cu.m./day of waste

 Land Area: 1,070 sq.m.

(15 m x 71.33 m)

 Recovery Area: 259

sq.m. (15 m x 21 m)
DESCRIPTION
 Operation Time:
Mon. and Tue.: 7am to 12mn
Wed. to Sat.: 7am to 9pm

 Manpower: 53 sorters
4 checker
SALARY OF SORTERS
 Weekly Income:
4k to 5k: hardworking
2k to 3k: average

 Income Sharing:
Sorter: 35%
Lessee: 65%
RECYCLABLE BUYERS
 Nano Junkshop, Vientereales Valenzuela (metal)

 EFI, Caibiga Caloocan City (paper, carton)

 RMCE, Brgy. Parada Valenzuela City (metal)

RECYCLING FACILITY

 Eagle Group of Companies Plastic City

Vientereales Valenzuela City
CONCEPT OF MRF FOR DRY
• Receive waste
• Sort manually by
type
• Store recyclable
materials
• Market the waste
• Residual to SLF

16
DESCRIPTION
It accepts both biodegradable and non-
biodegradable waste to ensure that 100% of the
waste stream is subjected to the sorting process,
and can target a greater number of materials for
recovery.
LEASE AGREEMENT
Obligations of the lessee:
 Maintain the removal of the recovered recyclables on a
daily basis
 Record of recyclables shall be submitted to CEMO on a
weekly basis
 Provide his personnel with their PPE
 Responsible for the maintenance of cleanliness and order
in the facility
LEASE AGREEMENT

Obligation of City (CEMO):

 Monitor the performance and the operations of
the lessee including its compliance.
REVENUE
Year Monthly Rental Revenue
2012 P182,000.00 1,638,000.00
2013 P198,200.00 2,180,200.00
2014 P106,500.00 958,500.00
2015 P107,000.00 1,070,000.00
2016 P107,200.00 1,286,400.00
2017 113,000.00 1,243,000.00
2018 114,000.00 1,140,000.00
2019 116,000.00 1,276,000.00
2020  116,300.00 1,395,849.96
2021 116,355.00 1,396,260.00 
LESSEE
Year Lessee
2012 ISWIMS
2013 SLT Enterprises
2014 Waseeco Builders Inc.
2015 J. Sanchez Trading International
2016 J. Sanchez Trading International
2017 ISWIMS
2018 ISWIMS
2019 Kalakal Universal Ventures Corp.
2020 Kalakal Universal Ventures Corp.
2021 Kalakal Universal Ventures Corp.
ECONOMIC IMPACT

On the part of city government: the program has

contributed to the decrease in the cost being
incurred in the disposal of solid waste.
SOCIAL IMPACT

The program has stirred the consciousness of the

community, thereby promoting waste segregation
and recycling practices at the household level.
POLITICAL IMPACT

The program has made the constituents feel the

presence of the city government, thereby
strengthening their faith in their government.
POLITICAL IMPACT

It manifests the strong political will of the city

government in implementing bold and innovative
programs aimed at attaining full compliance with
the law.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
 The program has contributed to the reduction of
greenhouse gas emission to the environment.

 It reduces the amount of wastes that goes to the

landfill.