Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

 

What is Metal Fill? Why the Metal Fill is required?

    Metal fill, also known as metal dummy fill, is a technique used in VLSI  design to fill empty spaces on a chip
with metal. It involves inserting small metal structures into empty spaces to create a more uniform
distribution of metal on the chip.
    Metal fill is required for several reasons. One of the primary reasons is to prevent the formation of voids or
gaps in metal layers during the chip fabrication process. These voids can cause problems such as poor
electrical connectivity, increased resistance, and reduced reliability. By filling empty spaces with metal, the
risk of void formation is reduced, which helps to improve the overall quality and reliability of the chip.
    Another reason why metal fill is required is to address the issue of electrostatic discharge (ESD). ESD can
occur when two metal layers comes into contact with each other, creating a spark that can damage the chip.
By filling empty spaces with metal, the risk of metal-to-metal contact is reduced, which helps to prevent ESD
damage.
    In addition to these technical reasons, metal fill can also help to improve chip performance by reducing
electromagnetic interference (EMI) and improving signal integrity. By creating a more uniform distribution of
metal on the chip, metal fill can help to reduce the impact of EMI on signal propagation, which can improve
chip performance
What are the Open violation type
in verifyConnectivity? How to fix them?
• Open violations are a type of violation that can occur in a verify-connectivity check . Open violations occur
when a net or signal in a circuit is not properly connected to a voltage or ground source. This can cause the
net to be left floating or open, which can result in unpredictable behavior or malfunction of the circuit.
• There are several types of open violations that can be detected by a verify-connectivity check, including:
1. Floating inputs: This occurs when the input of a gate or flip-flop is not connected to a defined voltage or
ground source.
2. Unconnected output: This occurs when the output of a gate or flip-flop is not connected to any other
component in the circuit.
3. Unused pins: This occurs when a pin on a component is not used or connected to any other part of the circuit.

                                                                                                                    (continued in next slide)


What are the Open violation
type in verifyConnectivity? How to fix them?
• To fix open violations, you need to identify the specific location of the violation in the circuit and connect the
net to a voltage or ground source as appropriate. Here are some steps you can follow to fix open violations:
1. Use the EDA software's design rule checker (DRC) to identify the location of the open violation.
2. Check the design schematic to determine the appropriate voltage or ground source for the net.
3. Connect the net to the appropriate voltage or ground source using a resistor, capacitor, or other appropriate
component.
4. Run the verify-connectivity check again to ensure that the violation has been resolved.
• It's important to note that open violations can be difficult to detect and fix, particularly in large and complex
circuits. To avoid open violations, it's best to follow good design practices, such as always connecting inputs
and outputs to a defined voltage or ground source and using components as recommended by the
manufacturer.
What are regular nets and special nets?
Regular nets are the most common type of nets and represent the normal connections between circuit components.
They are typically used to connect inputs and outputs of logic gates, flip-flops, and other digital components.
Special nets, on the other hand, are used for specific purposes that require special handling by the EDA software. They
can be further classified into different types based on their functions. Here are some common types of special nets:
They are:
• Power nets: These are used to distribute power and ground throughout the circuit. They typically carry higher
voltages and currents than regular nets and require special handling by the EDA software to ensure proper power
distribution.
• Clock nets: These are used to distribute clock signals to different parts of the circuit. They require special handling to
ensure that the clock signal is distributed with minimal skew and jitter.
• Reset nets: These are used to reset the circuit to a known state. They require special handling to ensure that the reset
signal is distributed with minimal delay and that the circuit is properly initialized.
• Test nets: These are used for testing and verification purposes. They require special handling to ensure that the test
signals are properly routed and that the circuit is operating correctly during testing.
What are the techniques for addressing the
routing DRCs? Types of Routing DRCs
    There are several techniques for addressing routing DRCs, and the specific approach will depend on the type and
severity of the violation. Here are some common techniques for addressing routing DRCs:
• Manual correction: For minor violations, such as small clearance errors or length mismatches, manual correction
may be the most efficient approach. This involves manually adjusting the routing to correct the violation.
• Automated correction: For more complex violations or larger circuits, automated correction may be necessary.
This involves using EDA software tools to automatically adjust the routing to correct the violation. This can be
done using techniques such as rip-up and re-route or automated optimization algorithms.
• Rerouting: In some cases, the only way to address a routing violation may be to reroute the affected portion of the
circuit. This can be a time-consuming process, but it may be necessary to ensure that the circuit meets the required
specifications.
• Design optimization: In some cases, design optimization techniques can be used to address routing DRCs. This
involves adjusting the overall design parameters to reduce the likelihood of routing violations. For example,
increasing the size of components or adjusting the placement of components can help reduce clearance violations

                                                                                                                  (continued in next slide)


What are the techniques for addressing
the routing DRCs? Types of Routing DRCs
   There are several types of routing DRCs that can be detected by EDA software, including:
• Clearance violations: These occur when the distance between two nets or components is less than the
specified clearance requirement.
• Short circuits: These occur when two or more nets are inadvertently connected, causing a short circuit.
• Length mismatches: These occur when the length of two or more nets is different than the specified length
requirement.
• Routing congestion: This occurs when the routing is too dense or congested, making it difficult for the signal
to flow properly.
• Layer violations: These occur when a net or component is routed on the wrong layer or violates layer
restrictions.
What are the Routing constraint settings?
 Routing constraint settings define the specific requirements and constraints for routing a circuit. Routing
constraints ensure  that the circuit meets the required specifications and operates correctly. Here are some common routing
constraint  settings:

• Width constraints: These define the minimum and maximum widths of a net or signal trace. This ensures that the trace can
carry the required current and impedance without causing signal degradation.
• Spacing constraints: These define the minimum and maximum spacing between two nets or signal traces. This ensures that
there is enough clearance between the traces to prevent electrical interference and short circuits.
• Via constraints: These define the minimum and maximum size and spacing of vias. This ensures that the vias can carry the
required current and impedance and that there is enough clearance between the vias and other routing elements.
• Length constraints: These define the minimum and maximum length of a net or signal trace. This ensures that the trace
does not exceed the maximum length specified by the design requirements, which can cause signal degradation and timing
issues.
• Topology constraints: These define the allowable routing topologies for a net or signal trace. For example, a high-speed
signal may require specific routing topologies to ensure signal integrity.
• Layer constraints: These define the allowable layers for routing a net or signal trace. This ensures that the routing is done
on the correct layers and meets the layer restrictions specified by the design requirements.
• Differential pair constraints: These define the specific requirements for routing a differential pair signal, such as the
spacing between the two traces and the routing topology.
• Impedance constraints: These define the required impedance for a net or signal trace. This ensures that the trace can carry
 What are the different ways for doing ECO
routing? What are the differences between these?
    An Engineering Change Order (ECO) is a modification made to a design to correct errors, add new functionality, or improve
performance. ECO routing refers to the process of implementing these modifications in the routing of a circuit. Here are
some different ways for doing ECO routing:
• Manual ECO routing: This is the most straightforward and common approach, which involves manually making the required
changes in the routing of the circuit. The EDA software provides a graphical interface that enables the user to identify the
required changes and make the necessary edits in the routing.
• Automated ECO routing: This approach involves using specialized EDA software tools to automatically implement the
required changes in the routing. The software analyzes the circuit and identifies the areas that require modification, and then
generates the new routing to implement the changes.
• Partial ECO routing: This approach involves only routing the portion of the circuit that requires modification, rather than re-
routing the entire circuit. This can save time and reduce the risk of introducing new errors in the unmodified portions of the
circuit.
• Hybrid ECO routing: This approach combines both manual and automated ECO routing techniques. The software identifies
the areas that require modification and generates a new routing, which the user can then manually modify and refine as
necessary.
The main differences between these ECO routing approaches are in their level of automation and the amount of user
intervention required

You might also like