The document discusses six domains of research related to teacher preparation: 1) Inventory of issues in teacher quality, 2) Resonation of how teacher education fails to apply courses to practice, 3) Studies finding teacher interaction impacts student learning outcomes and motivation, 4) Reinforcing and debunking frameworks that assess teaching skills, 5) Assessing the contribution of coursework to instructional quality, and 6) The need to capture classroom instruction as evidence of student teacher readiness and to evaluate application of theory to practice in real classrooms.
The document discusses six domains of research related to teacher preparation: 1) Inventory of issues in teacher quality, 2) Resonation of how teacher education fails to apply courses to practice, 3) Studies finding teacher interaction impacts student learning outcomes and motivation, 4) Reinforcing and debunking frameworks that assess teaching skills, 5) Assessing the contribution of coursework to instructional quality, and 6) The need to capture classroom instruction as evidence of student teacher readiness and to evaluate application of theory to practice in real classrooms.
The document discusses six domains of research related to teacher preparation: 1) Inventory of issues in teacher quality, 2) Resonation of how teacher education fails to apply courses to practice, 3) Studies finding teacher interaction impacts student learning outcomes and motivation, 4) Reinforcing and debunking frameworks that assess teaching skills, 5) Assessing the contribution of coursework to instructional quality, and 6) The need to capture classroom instruction as evidence of student teacher readiness and to evaluate application of theory to practice in real classrooms.
The document discusses six domains of research related to teacher preparation: 1) Inventory of issues in teacher quality, 2) Resonation of how teacher education fails to apply courses to practice, 3) Studies finding teacher interaction impacts student learning outcomes and motivation, 4) Reinforcing and debunking frameworks that assess teaching skills, 5) Assessing the contribution of coursework to instructional quality, and 6) The need to capture classroom instruction as evidence of student teacher readiness and to evaluate application of theory to practice in real classrooms.
responsive to the needs of the real world classrooms (Hancock & Gallard, 2004), then why does the quality of teaching is the US and Australia still needs improvement? (Newman, King, & Secada, 1996; Queensland Department of Education, 2001; Gore, Ladwig, Griffins, & Amosa 2007; Chesley & Jordan, 2012). 2. Resonation
Gore et al., (2007) argues that the poor
quality of teaching implies that teacher education institutions have failed application of teacher preparation courses to practice or student teaching or also known as practicum (Halim, Buang & Meerah, 2010; Lee, 2007). 3. Compare & Contrast
Several studies attest to the value of social
support for students’ learning outcomes. Brok, Brekelmans & Wubbles (2004) used a survey questionnaire to examine teacher interaction in 45 third year physics classes. The study found that teacher’s behavior accounted for more than half of the variance in student learning outcomes and increased students’ motivation to learn ( Konold et al., 2008; Erdem, 2009). Similarly, in a meta-analysis of 119 studies from 1948 to 2004 with 1,450 findings and 355.325 students examining teacher student relationship in the classroom, Cornelius-white (2007) found that the quality of teachers’ interaction with their students such as encouraging them to learn, valuing students’ voice in the teaching and learning processes and providing support (Gillies, 2004; Aziz and Hossain, 2010) Had a significant impact on students’ learning outcome. Supportive behaviors may also come from students themselves (Gillies, 2004; Erdem, 2009; Aziz & Hossain, 2010). Other research focused on the role of cooperating teachers (Valencia et al., 2009; Yayli, 2008; Broadbent, 1998; Sinclair & Thistleton-Martin, 1999; Hopper & Sandford, 2004; Cochran- smith, 2005), perceptions of student teachers to practice teaching and their self-efficacy (Akkoc & Yesildere; 2010 Dorfman, Galluzo & Meisels, 2006; Gurbuzturk, 2009). When students are supported be teachers, they in turn become supportive of their classmates (Erdem et al., 2009) in their pursuit of learning ( Konold et al., 2008). While social support is crucial in students’ learning as evidence in the preceding perception based studies. Vygotsky’ socio cultural theory argues that support is better exemplified when students struggle in the pursuit of the substance of the lesson (Shabani, Khatib & Ebadi, 2010) and when teachers design assessment tasks that will intellectually challenge students (NSW DET, 2003). 4. Reinforce and Debunk (Set the premise first) While many researchers responded to the earlier call to investigate the lack of integration between theory and classroom practice, these studied led to the development of lengthy and broad performance assessment tools (see Chiarelot, Davidman & Muse, 1980), of questionable validity (Fish, 1995), and a framework that focused on a suggested range of teaching skills (Hiebert et al., 2007, Shehu & Mokgwathi, 2007). 5. Converge and Diverge
The contribution of university coursework
to student teachers’ instructional quality (Darling-Hammond, 2006; Akkoc & Yesildere, 2010; Darling-Hammond, 2006; Kevin, et al., 2005; Pecheone & Chung, 2006; Zeichner, 2010) such as classroom management, subject matter understandings, Instructional strategies and curriculum selection should be assessed based on explicit quality criteria. Also, student teachers must learn to attend simultaneously to these aspects of teaching, implement instruction and learn from the experience (Valencia et al., 2009; Ball & Forzani, 2009; Bates Ramirez & Drits, 22009; Cornu, 2005; Ediger, 2007; Kennedy, 2006; Lee, 2007; Parkison, 2008; Valencia et al., 2009). However, the issue of student teachers application of what has been learn at university in classroom instruction is still under investigation ( Clark, 2005; Fazio & Volante, 2011; Featherstone, 2007; Kervin, et al., 2005; Smith, 2010; Vick, 2006; Yayli, 2008). 6. Departure
Although the studies cited above are recognized
to be significant in the teacher preparation research, there is a need to capture what happens inside the classroom instruction (Damon, 2007)as a source of evidence (Darling-Hammond, 2006; AERA Panel on Research on Teacher Education, 2005) to assess student teachers’ readiness to teach (Hitz, 2008) and a mechanism by which they can reflect on areas of classroom instruction to improve their teaching performance (LaBoskey & Richert, 2002; Valencia et al., 2009; Wilkins, Shin & Ainsworth, 2009). More importantly, this evidence may also serve as basis to evaluate the application of theory to practice (Darling- Hammond & Snyder, 2000; Whitford, Rusco & Fickel, 2000; Koh & Luke, 2009; Wang et al., 2010) in real classroom (Lee, 2007; Bielefeldt, 2012; Chen, 2012; Connor et al., 2009; Farrell, 2011; Chesley & Jordan, 2012). It is expected that you will apply this in your thesis. . . .