Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 33

FITTINGS &

CONNECTION
S
Engr. Jan Christian R. Gimena
Instead of using a single complete unit of the same
material involving one manufacturing operation
which is ideal for an aircraft structure. Aircraft
structures today has a structure of several main
units held to other units by main or primary fittings
or connections, with each unit incorporating many
primary and secondary connections involving
fittings, bolts, rivets, welding, etc. The primary
fittings involve more weight and cost per unit
volume than any other part of the aerospace
structure, and therefore fitting and joint design plays
an important part in aerospace structural design.

10/04/2023 2
Economy in Fitting Design
The main goal of a structural design engineer is to use the least number of fittings in the structure particularly those
fittings connecting members that carry large loads. The following are things to remember in designing the fitting
layout:

• In a wing structure splicing the main beam


flanges or introducing fittings near the

1
centerline of the airplane are far more costly
than splices or fittings placed farther outboard
where member sizes and loads are
considerably smaller.

2
10/04/2023 3
1

• Avoid changes in direction of heavy


members such as wing beams and
2 fuselage longerons as these involve
heavy fittings.

3
10/04/2023 4
2

• If joints are necessary in continuous


beams place them near points of
3 inflection in order that the bending
moments to be transferred through the
joint be kept of small magnitude.

4
10/04/2023 5
3
• In column design with end fittings avoid
introducing eccentricities on the beam
and on the other hand make use of the
4 fitting to increase column end fixity thus
compensating some of the weight
increase due to fitting weight by saving in
the weight of the beam.
5
10/04/2023 6
4

• Poor layout of major fitting arrangement


5 may require very expensive tools and jigs
for shop fabrication and assembly.

6
10/04/2023 7
5

• Fittings likewise add considerably to the


cost of inspection and rejections of costly
6 fittings because of faulty workmanship or
materials are quite frequent, thus adding
greatly to the unit cost.

10/04/2023 8
Fitting Design Loads – Minimum Margin of Safety

The structure must have sufficient strength to carry the ultimate or design
loads without failure. The normal flight vehicle structure involves many
parts which are joined together by various types of connections. In
general, an additional blanket factor of safety is required for design of
these connections. This blanket factor of safety is normally 1.15 to 1.20.

The stress analysis of most connections or fittings is more complicated


than for the primary structural members due to such factors as combined
stresses, stress concentration, bolt-hole tightness, etc., thus an additional
factor of safety is necessary to give a similar degree of strength reliability
for connections as provided in the strength design of the members being
connected.

9
Aircraft Bolts and Bolt Fitting
The aircraft bolt is used primarily to transfer relatively large shear or tension loads from one structural member
to another. The figures below show three standard aircraft bolts in common use.
The hexagon head bolt is an Army-Navy standard bolt made from
SAE 2330-3.5 percent nickel steel; heat treated. The bolt head is of
sufficient size as to develop the full tensile strength of the bolt.
Mostly used for general applications involving tension or shear
loads.
The internal-wrenching bolt is a high strength steel bolt. The
head of the internal wrenching bolt is recessed to allow the
insertion of an internal wrench when installing or removing the
bolt It is especially suitable for main splice fittings because of its
high strength and the relatively small space required for the bolt
head.
The clevis bolt have slotted brazier type head and is referred to
as a shear bolt because its head is not designed to develop the
full tensile strength of the bolt. The clevis bolt is usually used
when a group or cluster of bolts is required to transfer a load by
shear loads on the bolts. The smaller bolt heads thus save weight
and also provide greater bolt head clearances.

The three bolts are also made from aluminum alloy for diameters over 1/4 inch. In many fittings designs weight can be saved by
using aluminum alloy bolts.

10/04/2023 10
General Rules in Using Bolts

• Bolt threads should not be


placed in bearing or shear.

1 2 3 4 5 6
• The length of the bolt
shank should be such that
not more than one thread
extends below fitting
surface, which can be done
by the use of washers.

1 2 3 4 5 6
• Bolts less than 3/8
diameter should not be used
in major fittings. For
steel bolts, 3/16inch
diameter should be the
smallest size to be used in
any fitting.

1 2 3 4 5 6
• Bolts connecting parts
having relative motion or
stress reversal should have
close tolerances to
decrease shock loads.

1 2 3 4 5 6
• For bolts connecting
members having relative
motion a lubricator should
be incorporated in the
surrounding parts of the
fitting; the fitting should
not be drilled to provide
lubrication.
1 2 3 4 5 6
• Bolts should be used in
double or multiple shear if
possible in order to
increase strength
efficiency in bolt shear
and to decrease bending
tendency on bolt.

1 2 3 4 5 6
Bolt Shear, Tension & Bending Strengths

Table 1 gives the section properties and the ultimate shear, tension and bending strengths
for AN Standard Steel bolts at room temperature.
10/04/2023 17
Table 2 gives the tensile and double shear strengths of Steel Internal Wrenching bolts.

10/04/2023 18
Table 3 gives ultimate shear, tension and bending strengths for aluminum alloy bolts.
10/04/2023 19
Bolts in Combined Shear and Tension
When bolts are subjected to both shear and tension loads, the resulting strength is
given by the following interaction equation:

3 2
𝑥 𝑦
3
+ 2 =1
𝑎 𝑏

Where: x = shear load


y = tension load
a = shear allowable load (From Table 1)
b = tension allowable load (From Table 1)

10/04/2023 20
Methods of Failure of Single Bolt Fitting and the Allowable Failing Loads
Failure by Bolt Shear
In the figure below, the bushing is not continuous between the plates, but each of the
three plates have separate bushings. As the pull P is placed on the fitting it tends to
shear the bolt at sections (1-1) and (2-2), (Fig. a). Fig. b illustrates the forces or
pressures on the bolt and the failure which can take place if the stresses are sufficient.

Let Pu represent the maximum or


ultimate load on the fitting. This force
Pu must be resisted by the shear
strength of the bolt at the two sections
(1-1) and (2-2). Hence,

𝑃 𝑢 (𝑏𝑜𝑙𝑡 𝑠h𝑒𝑎𝑟 ) =𝐹 𝑠𝑢 ∙ 𝐴 ∙2
Where: Fsu = ultimate shearing stress for bolt material
A = cross-sectional area of bolt
10/04/2023 21
Failure by Bolt Bending
The main concern regarding bolt bending is that under the limit loads any bending
deflection of the bolt be not permanent as such deformation would make removal
of the bolt difficult.

Failure of Lug Portion of Fitting.


The lug portion of the fitting refers to that portion of the fitting that involves the
hole for the single bolt that connects the male and female parts of the fitting unit.
The simplified assumptions regarding failing action and the resulting equations
which follow have been widely used for quick approximate check of the lug
strength. The procedure which follows will be referred to as Method 1.

10/04/2023 22
Method 1 of Bolt and Lug Strength Analysis
Failure in Tension
The figure indicates how a fitting plate can pull apart due
to tension stresses on a section through the centerline of
the bolt hole. Both the male and female parts of the fitting
must transfer the load past the centerline of the hole, thus
both parts must be considered in the design of a fitting.
Equating the allowable load Pu to the ultimate resisting
tensile stresses at points (a) and (b) in the figure, we obtain
𝑃 𝑢(𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛) =𝐹 𝑡𝑢 ∙ ( 2 𝑅 − 𝐷 ) 𝑡
Where: Ftu = ultimate tensile strength of plate material.
A = cross-sectional area of bolt

The equation assumes that the tensile stress on the cross-section is uniform. This is not true as
the flow of stress around the hole causes a stress concentration. To take care of this stress
concentration requires a margin of safety of 25 percent.
10/04/2023 23
Failure by Bearing of Bushing on Plate
In the figure, the pull Pu causes the bolt (not shown) to
press against bushing wall which in turn presses against
the plate wall. If the pressure is high enough the plate
material adjacent to the hole will start to crush and flow
thus allowing the bolt and bushing to move which results
in the elongated hole as illustrated in Fig. b. Equating the
load Pu to the ultimate bearing strength on the bearing
surfaces we can write,

𝑃 𝑢= 𝐹 𝑏𝑟 ∙ 𝐷 ∙ 𝑡

Where: Fbr = allowable bearing stress


D = diameter of bushing
t = plate thickness

10/04/2023 24
Failure by Bearing of Bolt Bushing
A bushing is pressed into the plate hole and thus it is considered as a tight fit. A fitting bolt
is usually considered as removable therefore a certain tolerance between the bolt and
bushing inside diameters is necessary in order to insert and remove bolt. If fitting is
subjected to reversible loads the small slop in the fitting tends to cause shock on the
fitting. Also, the fitting may be such that slight rotation takes place on the bolt, which
tends to cause wear between bolt and bushing. It is therefore customary to check the
bearing pressure between the bolt and the bushing since failure of the bushing could take
place in a manner explained in the previous article dealing with bearing of bushing on
plate. Then as before,
𝑃 𝑢= 𝐹 𝑏𝑟 ∙ 𝐷 ∙ 𝑡

Where: Fbr = allowable bearing stress


D = bolt diameter
t = plate thickness
10/04/2023 25
A margin of safety of 50 percent should be maintained. If the fitting is
subjected to infrequent rotation under load but with load involving no shock
or vibration, require a margin of safety of 100 percent. If shock or vibration
with infrequent rotation is present, require a margin of safety of 150 percent.
Shock is considered to occur in such structures as landing gears, gun mounts,
hoisting, mooring and towing connections.
In general, it is good design practice to design lugs conservatively as the
weight of lugs is small relative to their importance in ensuring the safety of
the flight vehicle. Inaccuracies in manufacture are difficult to control. It is
good design practice to provide sufficient material to permit drilling for a
bushing if bushing is not used in original design. If castings are used as fittings,
much higher factors of safety on the limit loads are specified because of the
low ductility of the material in castings.
10/04/2023 26
Method 2 Lug Strength Analysis Under Axial Loading

The important difference between


Method 1 and Method 2 is that curves
derived from test results give the stress
concentration factor to use for tension
on the net section and the shear out
failure as assumed in Method 1 has been
replaced by a combined shear-out
bearing failure. The figure shows the lug-
pin combinations and types of failure

10/04/2023 27
Bolt Bending Strength
Static tests of single bolt fittings will not show a failure due to bolt bending failure. However, it
is important that sufficient bending strength be provided to prevent permanent bending
deformation of the fitting bolt under the limit loads so that bolts can be readily removed in
maintenance operations. Furthermore, bolt bending weakness can cause peaking up a non-
uniform bearing pressure on the fitting lugs thus influencing the lug tension and shear
strength.
The unknown factor in bolt bending is the true value
of the bending moment on the bolt because the
moment arm to the resultant bearing forces is
unknown. An approximate method for determining
the arm (b) to use in calculating the bending moment
on bolt is given in the figure, which gives:

𝑡 1 𝑡2
𝑏= + + 𝑔
2 4
10/04/2023 28
SAMPLE PROBLEM
1. The Figure shows a single pin fitting. The lug material is AISI Steel, heat treated to . The bolt is AN steel, .
The bushing is steel with . The fitting is subjected to an ultimate tension load of . The fitting will be
strength checked for the design load. The check will be made by both Methods 1 and 2. for steel with .

SOLUTION BY METHOD 1:
A fitting factor of safety of 1.15 will be used which
is standard practice for military airplanes.

𝐷𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝐹𝑖𝑡𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑=𝐹 . 𝑆 . ∗ 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑


𝐷𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝐹𝑖𝑡𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑=1.15 ∗15650 𝑙𝑏
𝐷𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝐹𝑖𝑡𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑=17997.5 𝑙𝑏

10/04/2023 29
Check of Bolt Shear Strength:
Bolt is in double shear. From Table 1,single shear strength 𝑀𝑟 1968.4765625 𝑙𝑏 . 𝑖𝑛∗ 0.25 𝑖𝑛
𝐹 𝑏= , 𝐹 𝑏= 4
of 1/2 inch diameter AN steel bolt is 14700 lb. Hence, 𝐼 0.003069 𝑖𝑛

𝑃 𝑢=2∗ 14700 𝑙𝑏 𝑀 . 𝑆 .= ( 29400 𝑙𝑏


17997.5 𝑙𝑏)−1 𝐹 𝑏=160351.62614044 𝑝𝑠𝑖

𝑃 𝑢=29400 𝑙𝑏 𝑀 . 𝑆 .=0.6335602167
From table 1, for AN steel bolts is
Check of Bending of Bolt:
Referring to the figure on Bolt bending, the moment arm
for calculating bending moment on bolt is,
𝑡 1 𝑡2
𝑀 . 𝑆 .= ( 180000 𝑝𝑠𝑖
160351.62614044 𝑝𝑠𝑖 )
−1

𝑏= + + 𝑔 ,(𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒 𝑔 𝑎𝑠 1/ 64 𝑖𝑛)
2 4 𝑀 . 𝑆 .=0.1225330502
0.21875 𝑖𝑛 0.375 𝑖𝑛
𝑏= + +0.015625 𝑖𝑛
2 4
𝑏=0.21875 𝑖𝑛 Check of Lug A:

𝐵𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑀𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑛 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡 = ( )


𝑃𝑏
2
𝑏
This lug is more critical than lug B since thickness of lug B
is more than one-half of lug A.
𝐵𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑀𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑛 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡 = ( 17997.5 𝑙𝑏
2 )0.21875 𝑖𝑛

𝐵𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑀𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑛 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡 =1968.4765625 𝑙𝑏. 𝑖𝑛


10/04/2023 30
Check of Tension through Bolt Hole:
𝑃 𝑢= 𝐹 𝑡𝑢 ∗ 𝐴𝑡 Bearing Strength:
The bushing and lug have the same ultimate strength
𝑃 𝑢=125000 𝑝𝑠𝑖 ∗ ( 1.1875 𝑖𝑛 − 0.625 𝑖𝑛 ) ∗0.375 𝑖𝑛
(Ftu), thus bearing will be critical for bolt on bushing
𝑃 𝑢=26367.1875 𝑙𝑏 since bearing area is less.
𝑃 𝑢= 𝐹 𝑏𝑟 ∗ 𝐴 𝑏𝑟
𝑀 . 𝑆 .=(26367.1875 𝑙𝑏
17997.5 𝑙𝑏
−1 ) An extra 50 percent margin of safety is required or the
allowable bearing stress Fbr should be divided by 1.5.
𝑀 . 𝑆 .=0.4650472288
To take care of stress concentration, Method 1 says
maintain a M.S. of .25, thus lug tensile strength is O.K.
𝑃 𝑢= ( 194000 𝑝𝑠𝑖
1.5 )
∗ ( 0.5 𝑖𝑛 ) ∗ 0.375 𝑖𝑛

𝑃 𝑢=24250 𝑙𝑏
Check of Shear Out Strength of Lug:
𝑃 𝑢= 𝐹 𝑠𝑢 ∗ 𝐴 𝑠 , 𝐹 𝑠𝑢=82000 𝑝𝑠𝑖 𝑀 . 𝑆 .= ( 24250 𝑙𝑏
17997.5 𝑙𝑏 )
−1

𝑃 𝑢=82000 𝑝𝑠𝑖 ∗ ( 0.59375 𝑖𝑛 − 0.3125 𝑖𝑛 ) ∗2 ∗ 0.375 𝑖𝑛 𝑀 . 𝑆 .=0.3474093624


𝑃 𝑢=17296.875 𝑙𝑏

31
SOLUTION BY METHOD 2:
Figure D1.12 says that a M.S. of 0.15 is appropriate over
Bolt Shear Strength and Bolt Bending Strength are that of all required fitting factors of safety, thus our M.S.
calculated in the same manner as in Method 1 and thus of 0.4357462842 provides more than this additional M.S.
the calculations will not be repeated. of 0.15.

Shear Bearing Strength:


Tension Net Section:
𝑃 𝑏𝑟𝑢= 𝐾 𝑏𝑟𝑢 ∗ 𝐹 𝑡𝑢 ∗ 𝐴𝑏𝑟
𝑃 𝑢= 𝐾 𝑡 ∗ 𝐹 𝑡𝑢 ∗ 𝐴𝑡
Kt is the tension efficiency factor to take care of stress Kbru is the shear-bearing efficiency factor and is
concentration due to the hole and is determined from obtained from Figure D1.13.
Figure D1.12. Table D1.3 says to use curve number 1 for 𝐷/𝑡=( 0.625 𝑖𝑛/0.375 𝑖𝑛 ) =1.66666666666667
all steels. To use Figure D1.12 requires the ratio . Then
from Figure D1.12, we read . Whence, 𝑒/ 𝐷= ( 0.59375 𝑖𝑛/0.625 𝑖𝑛 ) =0.95
From Figure D1.13, we read
𝑃 𝑢=0.98 ∗125 000 𝑝𝑠𝑖 ∗ ( 1. 1875 𝑖𝑛 −0. 625 𝑖𝑛 ) ∗ 0.375 𝑖𝑛 𝑃 𝑏𝑟𝑢=0.8 ∗125 000 𝑝𝑠𝑖 ∗0 .625 𝑖𝑛 ∗ 0.375 𝑖𝑛
𝑃 𝑢=25839. 84375 𝑙𝑏 𝑃 𝑢=23437.5 𝑙𝑏

𝑀 . 𝑆 .= ( 17997.5 𝑙𝑏 )
25839. 84375 𝑙𝑏
−1 𝑀 . 𝑆 .= ( )
23437.5 𝑙𝑏
17997.5 𝑙𝑏
−1

𝑀 . 𝑆 .=0.4357462842 𝑀 . 𝑆 .=0.3022642034
32
The reader should note shear out strength by Method 2
is considerably larger than by Method 1. Figure D1.13
says a 0.15 M.S. is appropriate, thus our 0.3022642034 is
satisfactory.
GENERAL CONCLUSION:
Bushing Yield:
Since all margins of safety are positive, the strength
for steel with
of fitting unit is satisfactory. It could be redesigned
to save weight. Moving the hole slightly back of the
𝑃 𝑏𝑟𝑦 =1.85 ∗ 113 000 𝑝𝑠𝑖∗ 0 .5 𝑖𝑛∗0.375 𝑖𝑛 center of the lug radius would help shear out
𝑃 𝑏𝑟𝑦 =39196.875 𝑙𝑏 strength. This change would permit decreasing the
thickness of lug slightly. Decreasing the lug
thickness would decrease the bolt bending
𝑀 . 𝑆 .= ( 39196.875 𝑙𝑏
17997.5 𝑙𝑏 )−1 moment and possibly permit use of 7/16 diameter
bolt. We should redesign the lug.
𝑀 . 𝑆 .=1.1779066537

33

You might also like