Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 34

Fibroblast Reprogramming using

Synthetic mRNA
Indra Kusuma
Laboratorium Kultur Sel Univ. YARSI
Contents

• Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs)


• mRNA Reprogramming
• iPSCs Culture and Characterization
• Embryoid Body Differentiation
• Somatic Cell for reprogramming
iPSCs
– Induced Pluripotents Stem Cells
• Unlimited Proliferative potential
• Mantain the Capacity to differentiate to any cell type
• Derived from adult patient cells/patient-specific

– Valuable tools for:


• In vitro modelling of human diseases
• Drug discovery
• Unlimited cell source for regenerative medicine
Bernal, 2013
Cells Reprogramming
– Reprogramming
• Conversion of a somatic/adult cell to the ES-like pluripotent
state
• Morphology, proliferation, gene expression and epigenetics
– Reprogramming strategies
• Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer (SCNT)
• Cell Fusion
• Direct Reprogramming
– Ectopic expression of transcription factors
– Yamanaka Factors: Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc
– Thomson Factors: Oct4, Sox2, Nanog, Lin28
Hu, 2014
Hu, 2014
mRNA Reprogramming
– Synthetic/modified mRNA transfected
• Microinjection
• Electroporation
• Liposomal delivery
– Translated mRNA  ectopic expression of
Reprogramming factor (Yamanaka/Thomson)
Comparison of Method
Delivery Method Pros Cons Efficiency

Retrovirus Lasting Expression Risk of Insetional 0,2%


Mutagenesis
Multiple cell
Low Frequency of division to
Episomal 0,1%
Integration eliminate episomal
DNA
Strong Innate
mRNA Non-Integrating Immunity response 4%
Affected by quality
Absolute non-
rProtein genome integration of recombinant 0,34%
protein
Comparison of Methode
Delivery Method Pros Cons Efficiency

Retrovirus Lasting Expression Risk of Insetional 0,2%


Mutagenesis
Multiple cell
Low Frequency of division to
Episomal 0,1%
Integration eliminate episomal
DNA
Strong Innate
mRNA Non-Integrating Immunity response 4%
Affected by quality
Absolute non-
rProtein genome integration of recombinant 0,34%
protein
Comparison of Methode
Delivery Method Pros Cons Efficiency

Retrovirus Lasting Expression Risk of Insetional 0,2%


Mutagenesis
Multiple cell
Low Frequency of division to
Episomal 0,1%
Integration eliminate episomal
DNA
Strong Innate
mRNA Non-Integrating Immunity response 4,4%
Affected by quality
Absolute non-
rProtein genome integration of recombinant 0,34%
protein

Note: Reprogramming using primary


fibroblast results : episomal method 4x Goh et al 2013 & Bernal 2013
retroviral, 50x mRNA
MACS Academy, 2014

Durruthy et al, 2014


iPSCs Colonies

MACS Academy, 2014

Isolation of iPS Clones:

• Manual Picking  Cut and Paste Methode Clump passaging

• Enzymatic (TrypLE/Accutase/dispase/collagenase IV)  TRA-1-60 Magnetic


Isolation  Single Cell Passaging (requires ROCK inhibitor)
Cut-Paste Method

MACS Academy, 2014


iPSCs Characterization
– Morphology of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs)
– hPSCs Growth & culture systems
– Spontaneous differentiation
– Alkaline Phospatase staining
– Marker expression – Flow Cyt & ICC
– Karyotyping
– Gene Expression Analysis
– Assesment of Developmental potential:
• In vitro differentiation potential- Embyoid Bodies
• In vivo differentiation potential – teratoma assay
Human PSCs

Morphology :
• Monolayer culture
• Tightly packed cells
Lab Kultur YARSI, 2014
• Defined colony borders
• High nuclear cytoplasmic ratio
(N/C ratio)

MACS Academy, 2014


hPSCs Culture systems
– Co-culture systems
• Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (mEF)
• Human foreskin fibroblast (hFF)
– Feeder-free culture
• Matrigel (not Xeno-free)
• Vitronectin
• Laminin
– Serum-free, Xeno-free, Feeder-free culture system
Spontaneous Differentiation

MACS Academy, 2014


Flat out growing,
No defined colony border
Alkaline Phospatase staining

MACS Academy, 2014


– Cell membrane enzyme related to pluripotency
– AP= hydrolase enzyme for dephophorylation
– The enzyme hydrolases a substrate which reacts with a colorimetric reagent
and form precipitate
– Red color for undifferentiated AP expressing colonies
Markers
– Flowcytometry Analysis & Imunocytochemistry
– Reprogramming involves sequential activation of pluripotency
markers
• Alkaline phosphatase
• SSEA-4
• Oct-4 Intracelullar markers
• Nanog
• TRA-1-60 surface markers
– Inconspicuous morphology: TRA-1-60 started downregulating
– Overgrown colonies, flat-out growing: TRA-1-60
downregulated, SSEA-4 started downregulating
Karyotype of PSCs
– Normal: 46 Chromosomes (44 autosome & 2 sex
Chromosomes); 46,XY
– Abnormal karyotype: 47 chromosomes, trisomy in
chromosome 12; 47,XY+12

– Feeder co-culture is robust and stable: gold


standard
• Gamma/X irradiation : 3000 rad (30 Gy)
• Mytomicin-C: 10ug/ml incubate 2-3 hours, 37oC,5% CO2
Gene Expression analyis

– Microarray analysis
• DNA-Microarray
• Protein-Array

– Real Time PCR


Pluripotency Assesment
– In vitro assesment: Embryoid body Formations
– EBs formation (spontaneous differentiation)
• Asses markers form endordermal, mesodermal and
ectodermal lineage
• Imunocytochemistry, Flowcytometry

– In Vivo assesment: Teratoma Assay


• Requires imunodefficient strain animals
• SCID mice or athymic rats
Embryoid Bodies
– formation of cell aggregates in non-adherent spheroids
– Strategies to induce EB-formation
• Basic methods:
– Hanging drops
– Static suspension
• Alternative methods
– Round bottom
– V bottom
• Bioreactor methods
– Spinner flasks
– Orbital shaker
3D Differentiation via EBs

Similar to gastrulation of an epiblast-


stage embryo in vivo

Recapiltulates molecular and celullar


morphogenic and inductive signals of
embryo development

Wang et al, 2010


EBs Dissociation
– EB-derived cells:
• Dissociate Ebs to single cells suspensions at various
stage of differentiation
• Cultivation of EB-derived cells
• Phenotyping or enumeration bt flow cytometry
• Separation of distict cell types using MACS or FACS
– Dissociation
• Efficent dissociation between 4-20 day of EB diff.
• Simple, Trypsinization and manual pippeting (up-down
pippeting/trituration)
Somatic Cells for Reprogramming
• Patient-spesific cells
– Human Dermal Fibroblasts(HDFs)
– Human Epidermal Keratinocytes (HEKs)
– Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs)

Lab Kultur YARSI, 2014


Fibroblast- YARSI
– Skin eksplant method
– Standard DMEM-10% FBS culture
– Collagen 1 and 3 secretion
– OCT4 mRNA expression
– Cryopreservation ( >80% recovery)
– Doubling Time: 30-40 hours
– Split ratio: 1:10
Keratinocytes Transdifferentiation

Bickenbach, 2013
Chemical Reprogramming

Bickenbach, 2013
Keratinocytes-YARSI
– Enzymatic Isolation Method
– Serum-free culture system
– Doubling Time: 40-44 hours
– Split Ratio: 1:2

– Currentlly assesed:
• Serum-free cryopreservation
• AQP3 (Aquaporin) mRNA Expression
PBMCs Reprogramming
– Lentiviral vector & Episomal vector
– CD34+ mononuclear cells (0,01-0,1% in PB)
– CD 33+/CD3-/19- Myeloid /Non Lymphoid
– Magnetic enrichment and serum-free culture
w/EPO

Jun Su et al, 2013


Conclussions

– Dermal Fibroblast to reprogram


– iPSCs generation using mRNA reprogramming
– Feeder Co-Culture system
– Enzymatic method for single cell passaging
– Embryoid bodies differentiation for in vitro
pluripotency assesment
– Hanging-drop method for EBs formation
Thank You

You might also like