Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analysis, Design and Estimation of Multi-Storey Building Using Build Master
Analysis, Design and Estimation of Multi-Storey Building Using Build Master
Analysis, Design and Estimation of Multi-Storey Building Using Build Master
TEAM MEMBERS:
Y. NAVEEN 15505A0113
P. CHANDRASEKHAR 15505A0112
M.JAGADEESH 15505A0107
P. ANUSHA 15505A0110
D.BHUVANESWARI 15505A0104
LIVE PROJECT
NAME OF PROJECT: Analysis, design and estimation of multi-storey G+3
building using build master
OWNER: Sri S. Samuelu
LOCATION: Door no: 1-61, Vijayawada – Meduru Main road, Veerankilaku,
Pamidimukkala Mandal, Krishna [D], Andhra Pradesh.
OBJECTIVES OF STUDY
Using surveying fundamentals the area of the plot has been measured.
The area of the plot = 4309 Square feet. i.e. 478.78 sq. Yards, 9.97 cents ≈ 10 cents.
SOIL INVESTIGATION
Introduction:
Sampler:- spilt spoon sampler
In order to find out the bearing capacity of soil and to decide suitable foundation type the
sub soil investigation has been carried out with the following
Soil boring of 150 mm diameter upto10 meters depth in one location.
Collection of undisturbed and disturbed soil samples from the bore.
Conducting standard penetration test (SPT) at regular intervals within the bore.
Testing of undisturbed and disturbed soil samples collected from the bore in the
laboratory.
Based on the soil investigation and related tests the following 3 alternatives have been
given to select the foundation.
ALTERNATIVE 1: OPEN FOUNDATION.(AS PER IS:2911-1984 -1 )
Open foundation in the form of isolated footing/raft foundation is foundation is proposed.
A total depth of foundation of 2.50 – 3.50 meters below the EGL is proposed.
An allowable bearing capacity of 60 kn/m2 [6.0 t/m2] is recommended for at 2.00 m for
the isolated footing and 7.0 t/m2 for the raft foundation.
An allowable bearing capacity of 50 kn/m2 [5.0 t/m2] is recommended for at 3.00 m for
the isolated footing and 6.0 t/m2 for the raft foundation.
An allowable bearing capacity of 90 kn/m2 [9.0 t/m2] is recommended for at 4.00 m for
the isolated footing and 10.0 t/m2 for the raft foundation.
ALTERNATIVE 2 : UNDER-REAMED PILE
Under-reamed pile foundation is also suitable at this location. The load carrying
capacity of these piles will be as follows.(as per IS:2911-1984 - 4)
10.00 31
500mm Bored pile 9.00 31
10.00 33
600mm Bored pile 9.00 38
10.00 42
UNDER –REAMED PILES WITH PILE CAP
(As per IS:2911-1984(4)
SINGLE AND DOUBLE UNDER –REAMED PILES
(As per IS:2911-1984(4)
DEVELOPMENT OF ARCHTECTURAL PLANS(NBC-2016)
RCC PLANS TO USE IN BUILD MASTER SOFTWARE
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
Loads considered:- The code used for the loading is IS:875 as follows:
1. Dead loads (Part – I)
2. Imposed loads (Part – II)
3. Wind loads(Part – III)
4. Snow loads(Part – IV)
5. Special loads and loads combinations(Part – V)
6. Earthquake loads. ( As per IS:1893-1984).
Load cases:-
Dead load, Imposed load,
RIL (reduced imposed loads)
EPX (earthquake parallel to x direction)
TPX (torsion parallel to x direction)
EPZ (earthquake parallel to z direction)
WPX (wind load parallel to x direction)
Load combinations:-
1.50 DL + 1.50 IL
1.50 DL + 1.50 EPX + 1.50 TPX
0.90 DL + 1.50 EPX + 1.50 TPX
1.20 DL + 1.20 RIL + 1.20 EPX + 1.20 TPX
1.50 DL + 1.50 WPX
1.20 DL + 1.20 IL + 1.20 WPX
Accordingly total 61 load combinations are considered.
Loading daigram(for all loads)
Deflection, Shear force and Bending moment diagram
DESIGN AND DETAILING
SLAB DESIGN
Arrangement of Reinforcement
Beams :-
Slabs:-
Column and Beam Junction:-
8 mmTOR
8mm TOR @ 8mm TOR @ 3 Nos 12
1 Group – I C2,C14,C17 2580 680 800 11 - 16mm TOR @ 140 mm
140 mm c/c 140 mm c/c mm TOR
c/c
8 mmTOR
C4,C5,C10,C11,C12, 8mm TOR @ 8mm TOR @ 3 Nos 12
2 Group - 2 2580 680 800 8 - 16mm TOR @ 140 mm
C13,C15,C18 140 mm c/c 140 mm c/c mm TOR
c/c
8 mmTOR
8mm TOR @ 8mm TOR @ 3 Nos 12
3 Group - 3 C1,C3,C6,C8,C16 2580 680 800 7 - 16mm TOR @ 140 mm
140 mm c/c 140 mm c/c mm TOR
c/c
8 mmTOR
8mm TOR @ 8mm TOR @ 3 Nos 12
4 Group - 4 C7,C9,C19,C20 2580 680 800 6 - 16mm TOR @ 140 mm
140 mm c/c 140 mm c/c mm TOR
c/c
Pile cap , Plinth beam and floor beam layout :-
Column reinforcement details :(230mm X 380mm)
CONCLUSIONS:-
It is observed from the results obtained for the plan of G+3 residential building
that, it is drafted as per building bye-laws by following the National Building
Code 2017. the plan was drafted using layers in Auto CAD 2010 and it was
imported to Build Master software.
It is analysed as per IS 456:2000, IS 875(part-1,2& 3), IS 1893:2002, IS
13920:1993 by BUILD MASTER as it takes so much time to analyse these kind
of structures manually.
It is advantageous software by comparing with staad.pro and we can observe
plans and design layouts and reinforcement detailing only in this software.
The results are obtained from Build Master output; hence the analysis is
satisfactory for the given geometry.
REFERENCES :-
Illustrated design of reinforced concrete building by Dr.V.L. shah and
Dr.S.R. karve.
Building planning and designing by Gurucharan singh & jagadeesh singh.
IS 456:2000, Code od practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete.
IS 1893 (part-1):2002, Criteria for Earth Quake Resistant Design of
structures.
IS 875(part-1,2 & 3) Code of practice for Design Loads for Building and
Structures.
IS 2911(part-III)-1980, Design of Under-Reamed piles.
IS SP-34:1987 Hand Book On Concrete Reinforcement And Detailing.
Estimation and costing, theory and practice by B.N.Dutta.
3D DRAWINGS